Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Outdoor exposure tests of structural laminated veneer lumber I: evaluation of the physical properties after six years

Abstract

To investigate the durability of structural laminated veneer lumber (LVL), outdoor exposure tests have been conducted since 1990 at a field-testing site at the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute. This paper is an interim report on the results after 6 years' exposure. Seven kinds of structural LVL with no preservative treatment were subjected to the tests. These specimens were sampled at the testing site each year and then stored for more than 1 year in a testing room conditioned at 20°C and 65% relative humidity. We then measured the modulus of elasticity (MOE) by longitudinal vibration frequency, the penetration depth by the Pilodyn method, weight loss, color difference (†E *) by the CIEL * a * b * system, swelling, compression strength, and bending-shear strength. Deterioration caused by outdoor exposure was obvious in the color, weight, MOE, and compressive strength of LVLs, but not in the penetration depth by the Pilodyn method or the bending-shear strength. The retention values of MOE and compressive strength after 6 years of exposure were 78% and 77%, respectively. The difference in durability among material species was not significant in general, except that heavy decay by brown rot fungi took place on some of the grand fir specimens. It should be noted that no significant delamination occurred in any of the adhesive layers, although slight checks developed on the surface of the specimens.

References

  1. Bodig J, Fyie J (1986) Performance requirements for exterior laminated veneer lumber. For Prod J 36:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laufenberg TL (1982) Exposure effects upon performance of laminated veneer lumber and glulam materials. For Prod J 32:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gromala DS, Moody RC, Sprinkel MM (1985) Performance of a press-lam bridge: a 5-year load-testing and monitoring program. USDA Forest Service research note FPL-0251, pp 1–7

  4. Hayashi T, Miyatake A, Kawai S (2000) Effects of outdoor exposure on the strength distribution of oriented strand board (OSB) and particle board (in Japanese). Zairyo 49:384–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang ST, Wang SY, Cheng SS (1999) Red color enhancement of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) heartwood by light irradiation. J Wood Sci 45:271–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka T (1994) Nondestructive evaluation of bending and tensile strength of sugi planks. In: 1994 International symposium on the utilization of fast-growing trees, pp 91–100

  7. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (1991) Japanese agricultural standard for structural laminated veneer lumber

  8. Hayashi T (1993) Tensile strength distribution of laminated veneer lumber for structural use (in Japanese). Zairyo 42:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi T, Oshiumi S (1993) Bending strength distribution of laminated veneer lumber for structural use (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 39:985–992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi T, Miyatake A, Nagao H, Yamayoshi E, Asaoka I (1994) Compressive strength of short column laminated veneer lumber for structural use (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kogyo 49:264–268

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kimmel JD, Janowiak JJ, Baileys RT, Merrick P (1999) Characteristics of creosote-treated LVL materials. For Prod J 44:49–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, T., Miyatake, A. & Harada, M. Outdoor exposure tests of structural laminated veneer lumber I: evaluation of the physical properties after six years. J Wood Sci 48, 69–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766241

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766241

Key words