Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Effect of water potential on fruit body formation ofLentinula edodes in sawdust-based substrate


The influence of substrate water potential (ψ) on the growth and fruiting of three genotypes of shiitake (Lentinula edodes) was investigated. A slight reduction ofψ (−0.5MPa) stimulated mycelial and colony growth on liquid, agar, and sawdust-based substrates.L. edodes has been found to grow well at aψ around −0.5 MPa, which corresponds to a moisture content around 55%. A small decrease inψ at the final vegetative growth phase had positive effects on flush quantity. The substrateψ was significantly affected by the interaction between genotypes and spawn run time. Theψ of well-colonized mature substrate was −0.7MPa before and −4.OMPa after the fruiting. Theψ rose again to −0.7MPa during rapid absorbance of water by soaking, and this rise was repeated during the second and third flushes. It is suggested that the water-holding capacity of a substrate is related to culture maturity. Excellent water-providing capacity (higherψ) is expected in the substrate of well-matured cultures with a high density of mycelial colonization.


  1. 1.

    Boddy L (1983) The effect of temperature and water potential on growth rate of wood rotting basidiomycetes. Trans Br Mycol Soc 80:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Eamus D, Jennings DH (1984) Determination of water, solute and turgor potentials of mycelium of various basidiomycete fungi causing wood decay. J Exp Bot 35:1782–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tommerup IC (1984) Effect of soil water potential on spore germination by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 83:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalberer PP (1987) Water potentials of casing and substrate and osmotic potentials of fruit bodies ofAgaricus bisporus. Scientia Hortic 32:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Badham ER (1989) Influence of water potential on growth of shiitake mycelium. Mycologia 81:464–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ohga S (1990) Growth rate of mycelium of shiitake,Lentinus edodes, in relation to water potential of medium. J Fac Agr Kyushu Univ 34:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Magan N, Challen MP, Elliot TJ (1995) Osmotic, matric and temperature effects on in vitro growth ofAgaricus bisporus andA. bitorquis strains. In: Elliott TJ (ed) Science and cultivation of edible fungi. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 773–780

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Donnelly DP, Boddy L (1997) Development of mycelial systems ofStropharia caerulea andPhanerochaete velutina on soil: effect of temperature and water potential. Mycol Res 101:705–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miles PG, Chang ST (1997) Mushroom biology. World Scientific Publishing, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ohga S, Kitamoto Y (1997) Future of mushroom production and biotechnology. Food Rev Int 13:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Royse DJ, Bahler CC (1986) Effects of genotype, spawn run time, and substrate formulation on biological efficiency of shiitake. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:1425–1427

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Diehle DA, Royse DJ (1991) Effect of substrate heat treatment on biological efficiency (BE) and size of a selected line ofLentinula edodes. In: Maher MJ (ed) Science and cultivation of edible fungi. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 517–521

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ohga S, Roozendael FV, Aspinwall M, Miwa M (1992) Yield and size response of the shiitake mushroom,Lentinus edodes, depending on incubation time on sawdust-based culture. Trans Mycol Soc Jpn 33:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Donoghue JD, Denison WC (1995) Shiitake cultivation: gas phase during incubation influences productivity. Mycologia 87:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang YF, Molina FI (1995) Strain typing of Lentinula edodes by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. FEMS Microbiol Lett 131:17–20

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Clarke RW, Jennings DH, Coggins CR (1980) Growth of Serpula lacrimans in relation to water potential of substrate. Trans Br Mycol Soc 75:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wood DA, Goodenough PW (1977) Fruiting ofAgaricus bisporus: changes in extracellular enzyme activities during growth and fruiting. Arch Microbiol 114:161–165

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Leatham GF (1985) Extracellular enzymes produced by the cultivated mushroomLentinus edodes during degradation of a lignocellulosic medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:859–867

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ohga S (1992) Comparison of extracellular enzyme activities among different strains of Lentinus edodes grown on sawdustbased cultures in relationship to their fruiting abilities. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:310–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ohga S (1995) Sawdust-based cultivation ofLentinus edodes and degree of culture maturity (in Japanese). Mushroom Sci Biotechnol 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wood DA, Allan M, Claydon N, Dudley K (1990) Regulation and properties ofAgaricus bisporus endocellulase. In: Proceedings of the International Union of the Microbiological Society Congress, Osaka, p 586

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoji Ohga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohga, S. Effect of water potential on fruit body formation ofLentinula edodes in sawdust-based substrate. J Wood Sci 45, 337–342 (1999).

Download citation

Key words

  • Shiitake
  • Lentinula edodes
  • Water potential
  • Sawdust-based cultivation
  • Strain variety