Skip to main content

Advertisement

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Journal of Wood Science Cover Image

Aesthetic properties in knotty wood surfaces and their connection with people's preferences

Article metrics

  • 297 Accesses

  • 27 Citations

Abstract

For wood products that contain visible wood surfaces it is important to be able to describe, measure, and communicate the aesthetic properties desired. The aims of this investigation were to shed light on how people's preferences toward different wood appearances containing knots can be described and to create a better understanding of how to measure those preferences. A total of 215 persons from Sweden with different backgrounds were interviewed as to their preferences for 10 Scots pine wood surfaces containing knots. Their impressions and preferences were documented by a questionnaire with 54 questions and analyzed by a principal component analysis. A thorough description of what people see and value in a wood surface with knots is given in the body of the text. People's preferences are affected by a balance between two main properties: the degree of harmony and activity, and the importance of avoiding a state of disharmony when composing wood surfaces. When investigating people's preferences toward a knotty wood appearance, 13 of 54 questions proved to be important. Three questions detect the final assessment, and four describe the reasons for the final assessment. Finally, six questions describe the blend of wood properties in a more objective way and are to only a minor extent connected with the final assessments.

References

  1. 1.

    Encyclopaedia Britannica: interior design: http://www.eb.com

  2. 2.

    Hansen EN, Weinfurter S (1999) Softwood lumber quality requirements: examining the supplier/buyer perception gap. Wood Fiber Sci 31(1):83–94

  3. 3.

    Kotler P, Armstrong G, Saunders J, Wong V (1996) Principles of marketing. Prentice Hall, London, pp 441–448

  4. 4.

    Hansen EN, Bush RJ (1996) Consumer perceptions of softwood lumber quality. For Prod J 46(10):29–34

  5. 5.

    Pakarinen T (1999) Success factors of wood as a furniture material. For Prod J 49(9):79–85

  6. 6.

    Ozanne LK, Smith PM (1996) Consumer segments for environmentally marketed wooden household furniture. Wood Fiber Sci 28:461–477

  7. 7.

    Marchal R, Mothe F (1994) Appreciationof oak wood for the French consumer and wood professionals. Ann Sci For 51:213–231

  8. 8.

    Swearingen KA, Hansen EN, Reeb JE (1998) Customer preference for Pacific northwest hardwoods. For Prod J 48(2):29–33

  9. 9.

    Sadoh T, Nakato K (1987) Surface properties of wood in physical and sensory aspects. Wood Sci Technol 21:111–120

  10. 10.

    Broman NO (1995) Visual impressions of features in Scots pine wood surfaces: a qualitative study. For Prod J 45(3):61–66

  11. 11.

    Broman NO (1995) Attitudes toward Scots pine wood surfaces: a multivariate approach. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 41:994–1005

  12. 12.

    Broman NO (1996) Two methods for measuring people's preferences for Scots pine wood surfaces: a comparative multi-variate approach. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 42:130–139

  13. 13.

    Broman NO. Grönlund A (1996) The end-users' requirements for the aesthetical features of Scots pine wood. In: Proceedings of the second IUFRO Workshop WP S5.01-04, South Africa, pp 343–352

  14. 14.

    Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S (1999) Introduction to multi- and megavariate data analysis using projection methods (PCA & PLS). Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden

  15. 15.

    SIMCA 7.0 (1998) Reference manual version 7.0. Umetri, Umeå, Sweden

  16. 16.

    Courcoux PH, Séménou M (1997) Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model. Food Quality Preference 8(5/6):353–358

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to N. Olof Broman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broman, N.O. Aesthetic properties in knotty wood surfaces and their connection with people's preferences. J Wood Sci 47, 192–198 (2001) doi:10.1007/BF01171221

Download citation

Key words

  • Wood
  • Attitudes
  • Scots pine
  • Questionnaire
  • Interviewing technique