Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Journal of Wood Science Cover Image

Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension

Abstract

Microcrystalline cellulose with minimal surface charge was prepared from softwood kraft pulp via hydrolysis by 4N hydrochloric acid instead of sulfuric acid. To this material, sulfate ester groups as surface charge were introduced by treating with 55% (w/w) sulfuric acid. A treatment at 60°C for 2h gave nearly the same level of surface charge as that of the H2SO4 -hydrolyzed microcrystal. The number of sulfate groups were controlled by changing the H2SO4 treatment conditions. Although the microscopic size and shape of the microcrystalline particles were the same irrespective of the preparation method, the introduction of surface charge drastically reduced the viscosity and removed its time dependence. These changes in viscosity behavior are considered to result from charge-induced dispersion of loose aggregates existing in the initial charge-free microcrystals prepared by HCl hydrolysis.

References

  1. 1.

    Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1998) Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surfaces A 142:75–82

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Koch MJ (1961) Some hydrodynamic properties of neutral suspensions of cellulose crystallites as related to size and shape. J Colloid Sci 16:327–344

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Revol J-F, Godbout L, Dong XM, Gray DG, Cbanzy H, Maret G (1994) Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites; phase separation and magnetic field orientation. Liquid Crystals 16:127–134

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dong XM, Kimura T, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1996) Effects of ionic strength on the isotropic-Chral nematic phase transition of suspensions of cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 12:2076–2082

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mukherjee SM, Woods HJ (1953) X-ray and electron microscope studies of the degradation of cellulose by sulphuric acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 10:499–511

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Walter NM (1959) Liquid crystal systems from fibrillar polysaccharides. Nature 184:632–633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Revol J-F, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG (1992) Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int J Biol Macromol 14:170–172

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaillé JY (1995) Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 25:6365–6367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kats S, Beatson RP, Scallan AM (1984) The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Sven Papperstidn 6:R48-R53

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dong XM, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5:19–32

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mewis J (1979) Thixotropy: a general review. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 6:1–20

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mewis J, Spaull AJB (1976) Rheology of concentrated dispersions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 6:173–200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Simha R (1940) The influence of brownian movement on the viscosity of solutions. J Phys Chem 44:25–34

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li J, Revol J-F, Marchessault RH (1997) Effect of degree of deacetylation of chitin on the properties of chitin crystallites. J Appl Polym Sci 65:373–380

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Araki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araki, J., Wada, M., Kuga, S. et al. Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J Wood Sci 45, 258–261 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177736

Download citation

Key words

  • Cellulose microcrystal
  • Sulfate ester
  • Surface charge
  • Viscosity behavior