- Original Article
- Published:
Increasing the competitiveness of wood in material substitution: A method for assessing and prioritizing customer needs
Journal of Wood Science volume 52, pages 154–162 (2006)
Abstract
To increase the competitiveness of wood as a building material requires knowledge of which customer needs require attention in terms of quality improvement and/or product development to best satisfy customers. Hence, information as to the impact on customer satisfaction of the fulfillment of different customer needs, as well as the performance of wood and substitutes in providing for these needs, is needed. This article suggests the use of customer satisfaction modeling (CSM) for assessing customer needs. The methodology is evaluated in the context of floorcovering. The results suggest that CSM is well suited for extracting the information necessary for prioritizing customer needs: importance/impact and performance data for attributes as well as for customer benefits. The study indicates the necessity of considering substitute materials not only for performance comparisons; substitutes may also reveal otherwise latent customer needs. Practical, functional, benefits exert the greatest impact on customer satisfaction for wooden flooring as well as its closest substitutes, laminate and carpet. Hygiene and a low cost over the life cycle are apparently the customer benefits that require attention from wooden flooring manufacturers, because importance is high and performance relatively low.
References
Eastin IL, Shook SR, Fleishman SJ (2001) Material substitution in the US residential construction industry, 1994 versus 1998. Forest Prod J 51:30–37
Wagner ER, Hansen EN (2004) A method for identifying and assessing key customer group needs. Ind Market Manag 33:643–655
Anon (1998) Wood as a building material. A qualitative study-Denmark. Job no. 980901. Research International Norway, Oslo
Broman NO (1996) Two methods for measuring people’s preferences for Scots pine wood surfaces: a comparative multivariate analysis. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 42:130–139
Ahlmark D (1977) Substitute and competition — a study of product differentiation based on material properties (Swedish). Research report 6069. Ekonomiska forskningsinstitutet vid Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, EFI, Stockholm
Jonsson R (2005) The end-consumers choice of floorcovering in the Netherlands and the UK: a comparative pilot study of substitute competition. J Wood Sci 51:154–160
Shocker AD, Bayus BL, Kim N (2004) Product complements and substitutes in the real world: the relevance of “other products”. J Marketing 68:28–40
Graonic MD, Shocker AD (1993) On the transferability of features/level preferences across competing products serving the same purposes. Adv Consum Res 20:389–394
Warlop L, Ratneshwar S (1993) The role of usage context in consumer choice: a problem solving perspective. Adv Consum Res 20:377–382
Corfman KP (1991) Comparability and comparison levels used in choices among consumer products. J Marketing Res 28:368–374
Johnson MD (1988) Comparability and hierarchical processing in multialternative choice. J Consum Res 15:303–314
Ratneshwar S, Shocker AD (1991) Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures. J Marketing Res 28:281–295
Herrmann A, Gustafsson A, Elg M (1997) An integrative framework for product development and satisfaction measurement. In: Gustafsson A, Bergman B, Ekdahl F (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International QFD Symposium, vol 2. Linköping University, Linköping, pp 143–158
Johnson MD, Fornell C (1991) A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories. J Econ Psychol 12:267–286
Gustafsson A, Johnson MD (1997) Bridging the quality — satisfaction gap. Qual Manag J 4:27–43
Johnson MD (1998) Customer orientation and market action. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 183
Johnson MD, Gustafsson A (1997) Bridging the quality-satisfaction gap II: measuring and prioritizing customer needs. In: Gustafsson A, Bergman B, Ekdahl F (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International QFD Symposium, vol 2. Linköping University, Linköping, pp 21–34
Fornell C, Cha J (1994) Partial least squares. In: Bagozzi RP (ed) Advanced methods of marketing research. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 52–78
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 278
Thompson CJ, Locander WB, Pollio HR (1989) Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. J Consum Res 16:133–146
Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories for case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14:532–550
Yin K (1984) Case study research. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 160
Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis — a tutorial. Chemometr Intell Lab 2:37–52
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine De Gruyter, New York, pp 271
Fornell C (1987) A second generation of multivariate analysis: classification of methods and implications for marketing research. In: Houston MJ (ed) Review of marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 407–450
Wold H (1982) Systems under indirect observation using PLS. In: Fornell C (ed) A second generation of multivariate analysis: methods. Praeger, New York, pp 325–347
Gustafsson A, Johnson MD (2002) Measuring and managing the satisfaction-loyalty-performance links at Volvo. J Target Meas Anal Market 10:249–258
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 730
Anderson JC, Fornell C, Lehman DR (1994) Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability — findings from Sweden. J Marketing 58:53–66
Bergman B, Klefsjö B (1994) Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 478
Akao Y (1992) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity, Cambridge, pp 369
Moussatche H, Languell J (2001) Flooring materials — life cycle costing for educational facilities. J Facil 19:333–343
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jonsson, R. Increasing the competitiveness of wood in material substitution: A method for assessing and prioritizing customer needs. J Wood Sci 52, 154–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-005-0741-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-005-0741-8