- Published:
Bond durability of kenaf core binderless boards II: outdoor exposure test
Journal of Wood Science volume 54, pages 36–44 (2008)
Abstract
An outdoor exposure test was conducted on kenaf core binderless boards (pressing temperatures 200°, 180°, and 160°C; pressing pressure 3.0 MPa, time 10 min, target board thickness 5 mm, target board density 0.8 g/cm3) to estimate their bond durability. Modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), internal bonding strength (IB), thickness change, weight loss, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, and color difference (ΔE*) by the CIE L*a*b* system were measured at various outdoor exposure periods up to 19 months. These values were then compared with those of a commercial medium-density fiberboard (MDF; melamine-urea-formaldehyde resin; thickness 9.0 mm, density 0.75 g/cm3). Generally, dimensional stability and the retention ratios of MOR, MOE, and IB after the outdoor exposure test increased with increased pressing temperature of binderless boards. The MOR retention ratio of the kenaf core binderless boards with a pressing temperature of 200°C was 59.5% after 12 months of outdoor exposure, which was slightly lower than that of the MDF (75.6% after 11 months of outdoor exposure). Despite this, the bond durability of the kenaf core binderless boards should be viewed as favorable, especially when considering the fact that the retention ratio of 59.5% was achieved without binder and without obvious element loss.
References
Tamura Y (2002) Technology of ecological adhesives for wood (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kogyo 57:240–245
Tamura Y (2002) Technology of ecological adhesives for wood (2) (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kogyo 57:287–291
Theis M, Grohe B (2002) Biodegradable lightweight construction boards based on tannin/hexamine bonded hemp shaves. Holz Roh Werkst 60:291–296
Mobarak F, Fahmy Y, Augustin H (1982) Binderless lignocellulose composite from bagasse and mechanism of self-bonding. Holzforschung 36:131–135
Xu J, Han G, Wong ED (2003) Development of binderless particleboard from kenaf core using steam-injection pressing. J Wood Sci 49:327–332
Angles MN, Ferrando F, Farriol X, Salvado J (2001) Suitability of steam exploded residual softwood for the production of binderless panels. Effect of the pre-treatment severity and lignin addition. Biomass Bioenerg 21:211–224
Angles MN, Reguant J, Montane D, Ferrando F, Farriol X, Salvado J (1999) Binderless composites from pretreated residual softwood. J Appl Polym Sci 73:2485–2491
Van Dam JEG, Van Den Oever MJA, Keijsers ERP (2004) Production process for high density high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk. Ind Crop Prod 20:97–101
Suzuki S, Shintani H, Park SY, Saito K, Laemsak N, Okuma M, Iiyama K (1998) Preparation of binderless boards from steam exploded pulps of oil palm (Elaeis guneensis Jaxq.) fronds and structural characteristics of lignin and wall polysaccharides in steam exploded pulps to be discussed for self-bonding. Holzforschung 52:417–426
Okuda N, Sato M (2004) Manufacture and mechanical properties of binderless boards from kenaf core. J Wood Sci 50:53–61
Okuda N, Hori K, Sato M (2006) Chemical changes of kenaf core binderless boards during hot pressing (I): infl uence of the pressing temperature condition. J Wood Sci 52:244–248
Okuda N, Hori K, Sato M (2006) Chemical changes of kenaf core binderless boards during hot pressing (II): effects on the binderless board properties. J Wood Sci 52:249–254
Okuda N, Sato M (2006) Water resistance properties of kenaf core binderless boards. J Wood Sci 52:422–428
Chow S (1975) Bark boards without synthetic resins. Forest Prod J 25:32–37
Okuda N, Sato M (2007) Bond durability of kenaf core binderless boards I: two-cycle accelerated aging boil test. J Wood Sci 53: 139–142
McNatt JD, McDonald D (1993) Two accelerated-aging tests for wood-based panels. Forest Prod J 43:49–52
Karlsson POA, McNatt JD, Verrill SP (1996) Vacuum-pressure soak plus ovendry as an accelerated-aging test for wood-based panel products. Forest Prod J 46:84–88
Sekino N (2003) Outdoor and indoor exposure test of wood based panels (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kogyo 58:298–304
River BH (1994) Outdoor aging of wood-based panels and correlations with laboratory aging. Forest Prod J 44:55–65
Okkonen EA, River BH (1996) Outdoor aging of wood-based panels and correlations with laboratory aging: part 2. Forest Prod J 46:68–74
Williams RS, Swan L, Sotos P, Knaebe M, Feist WC (2005) Performance of finishes on western juniper lumber and particleboard during outdoor exposure. Forest Prod J 55:65–72
Suzuki S (2001) Durability performance of wood-based panel product and its test methods (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kogyo 56: 7–12
Hayashi T, Miyatake A, Kawai S (2000) Effects of outdoor exposure on the strength distribution of oriented strand board (OSB) and particle board (in Japanese). J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 49: 384–389
Alexopoulos J (1992) Accelerated aging and outdoor weathering of aspen waferboard. Forest Prod J 42:15–22
Hann RA, Black JM, Blomquist RF (1962) How durable is particleboard? Forest Prod J 12:577–584
Hayashi T, Miyatake A, Harada M (2002) Outdoor exposure tests of structural laminated veneer lumber I: evaluation of the physical properties after six years. J Wood Sci 48:69–74
Sudiyani Y, Tsujiyama S, Imamura Y, Takahashi M, Minato K, Kajita H (1999) Chemical characteristics of surfaces of hardwood and softwood deteriorated by weathering. J Wood Sci 45:348–353
Hayashi T, Miyatake A, Fu F, Kato H, Karube M, Harada M (2005) Outdoor exposure tests of structural laminated veneer lumber (II): evaluation of the strength properties after nine years. J Wood Sci 51:486–491
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Part of this report was presented at the International Symposium on Wood Science and Technology, IAWPS2005, November 27-30, 2005, Yokohama, Japan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okuda, N., Sato, M. Bond durability of kenaf core binderless boards II: outdoor exposure test. J Wood Sci 54, 36–44 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-007-0908-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-007-0908-6