- Original Article
- Published:
Description of green versus environmentally indifferent consumers of wood products in Scandinavia: flooring and decking
Journal of Wood Science volume 54, pages 402–407 (2008)
Abstract
Swedish and Norwegian potential consumers of eco-labeled wood products in do-it-yourself (DIY) retail stores were investigated in a study that focused on the end customers of two flooring applications and wood for outdoor decks. Data were collected from different populations yielding a multiproduct, multipopulation study. Consumers with preferences for eco-labeled wood products generally focused less on the product type than consumers that reported a low preference for eco-labeled wood properties. The green consumers presented a low price sensitivity and they were more often women. Other characteristics of green consumers observed in the substudies included a higher share of married couples/cohabiters, a secondary education, less advanced plans concerning purchase, and preferences for product warranty. The results can assist producers in making approximate descriptions of green consumers; however, socioeconomic and demographic variables should be complemented by other information that reflects attitudes and intentions to get a more comprehensive idea of green consumers of wood products.
References
Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D (2003) Forest certification (eco-labelling) programs and their policymaking authority: explaining divergence among North American and European case studies. Forest Pol Econ 5:225–247
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)/Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2007) Forest products annual market review 2006–2007. United Nations, Geneva
Ozanne LK, Smith PM (1998) Segmenting the market for environmentally certified wood products. Forest Sci 44:379–388
Veisten K (2002) Potential demand for certified wood products in the United Kingdom and Norway. Forest Sci 48:767–778
Bigsby H, Ozanne LK (2002) The purchase decision: consumers and environmentally certified wood products. Forest Prod J 52: 100–105
Anderson RC, Hansen EN (2004) The impact of environmental certification on preferences for wood furniture: a conjoint analysis approach. Forest Prod J 54:42–50
Hansmann R, Koellner T, Scholz RW (2006) Influence of consumers’ socioecological and economic orientations on preferences for wood with sustainability labels. Forest Pol Econ 8:239–250
Peattie K, Crane A (2005) Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qual Market Res 8:357–370
De Pelsmacker P, Janssons W, Sterckx E, Mielants C (2005) Consumer preferences for the marketing of ethically labelled coffee. Int Market Rev 22:512–530
Straughan RD, Roberts JA (1999) Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at the green consumer behaviour in the new millennium. J Consum Market 16:558–575
Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlenc GM (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 56:465–480
Broman NO (2000) Means to measure the aesthetic properties of wood. Doctoral Thesis, Division of Wood Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå
Jonsson R (2005) The end consumer’s choice of floorcovering in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom: a comparative pilot study of substitute competition. J Wood Sci 51:154–160
Marchal R, Mothe F (1994) Appreciation of oak wood for the French consumers and wood professionals. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 51:213–231
European Commission (2003) Commission directive 2003/2/EC of 6 January 2003 relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic, tenth adaptation to technical progress to Council Directive 76/769/EEC. http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/1_004/1_00420030109en00090011.pdf. Cited 15 June 2007
Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Chromated copper arsenate (CCA). http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/reregistration/cca/index.htm#general. Cited 15 June 2007
Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2005) The reconsideration of registrations of arsenic timber treatment products (CCA and arsenic trioxide) and their associated labels — report of review findings and regulatory outcomes, summary report. http://www.apvma.gov.au/chemrev/arsenic_summary.pdf. Cited 15 June 2007
GBR (2006) The annual report of the flooring industry Verksamhetsberättelse 2005 (in Swedish). GBR, Stockholm
Lindberg A (2004) First impressions last — a Kansei engineering study on laminate flooring at Pergo. LiTH-IKP-Ex — 04/2201-SE. Linköpngs Tekniska Högskola
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Green P, Srinivasan V (1978) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new development with implications for research and practice. J Market 54:3–19
Van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P (2005) Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Qual Prefer 16:181–201
Aaker D, Kumar V, Day GS (2000) Marketing research, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
Green PE, Krieger AM (1991) Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. J Market 55:20–31
Wittink DR, Cattin P (1989) Commercial use of conjoint analysis — an update. J Market 53:91–96
Anderson JC, Jain DC, Chintagunta PK (1993) Customer value assessment in business markets: a state-of-practice study. J Bus Bus Market 1:8–9
Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1994) Determinants of timeliness in product development. J Innovat Manag 11:381–396
Kaiser FG, Wölfing S, Fuhrer U (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. J Ecol Behav 19:1–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roos, A., Nyrud, A.Q. Description of green versus environmentally indifferent consumers of wood products in Scandinavia: flooring and decking. J Wood Sci 54, 402–407 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-008-0957-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-008-0957-5