Skip to main content
Journal of Wood Science

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Consumer perception of wood surfaces: the relationship between stated preferences and visual homogeneity

Journal of Wood Science volume 56, pages 276–283 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Information about people’s preferences as to wood products is of relevance to several decision makers in the forest sector. Studies revealing consumer preference provide information that can be used for marketing and manufacturing of wood products, but these also provide information of relevance to designers and decision makers involved in building design and construction processes. Previous studies show that the overall harmony of the visual surface is correlated with preference. In this study, perceived visual homogeneity is modeled for five copper-impregnated and five organic biocide-impregnated decking materials with different visual quality. The models are based on visual variables. Homogeneity is a function of material-dependent variables (dry knots, knot shape, and splay knot), production-dependent variables (stain), and surplus color, which is a combination of both wood property and treatment. The results imply that homogeneity is influenced by both wood properties and treatment. Producers of decking should, while maintaining a focus on using high-quality raw material, also focus on producing a product with an unstained appearance.

References

  1. Brandt JP, Shook SR (2005) Attribute elicitation: implications in the research context. Wood Fiber Sci 37:127–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigsby H, Rai C, Ozanne L (2005) Determining consumer preference for furniture timber. J For Prod Bus Res 2(2)

  3. Broman NO (2000) Means to measure the aesthetic properties of wood. Doctoral thesis 2000:26. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marchal R, Mothe F (1994) Appreciation of oak wood for the French consumer and wood professionals. Ann Sci Forestières 51:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyrud AQ, Roos A, Rødbotten M (2008) Product attributes affecting consumer preference for residential deck materials. Can J For Res 38:1385–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masuda M (2004) Why wood is excellent for interior design? From vision physical point of view. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Timber Engineering, Lahti, Finland, pp 101–106

  7. Lawless H, Heymann H (1998) Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evin E, Siekierski E (2002) Sensory evaluation of heating and air conditioning systems. Energy Build 34:647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Obata Y, Takeuchi K, Furuta Y, Kanayama K (2005) Research on better use of wood for sustainable development: quantitative evaluation of good tactile warmth of wood. Energy 30:1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S-Y, Lin F-C, Lin M-Y (2001) Thermal properties of interior decorating material and the sensation of cold/warm by contact. II: The relations among heat flux, temperature change of material, and sensation of cold/warm by contact. J Wood Sci 47:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Unscrambler, Version 9.7 (1986-2007) CAMO Software ASA, Oslo, Norway

  12. JMP, Version 7.02. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

  13. Nakamura M, Kondo T (2008) Quantification of visual inducement of knots by eye-tracking. J Wood Sci 54:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rice J, Kozak RA, Meitner MJ, Cohen DH (2006) Appearance wood products and psychological well-being. Wood Fiber Sci 38:644–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakuragawa S, Miyazaki Y, Kaneko T, Makita T (2005) Influence of wood wall panels on physiological and psychological responses. J Wood Sci 51:136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432, Aas, Norway

    Olav Høibø

  2. Norwegian Institute of Wood Technology, NO-0314, Oslo, Norway

    Anders Q. Nyrud

Authors
  1. Olav Høibø
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anders Q. Nyrud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav Høibø.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Høibø, O., Nyrud, A.Q. Consumer perception of wood surfaces: the relationship between stated preferences and visual homogeneity. J Wood Sci 56, 276–283 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1104-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1104-7

Key words