Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Ammonium nitrate-impregnated woodchips: a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer for plants

Abstract

Different types of fertilizers are widely used throughout the world for successful crop production. Chemical fertilizers have some adverse effects on the environment if used indiscriminately and are a major source of soil and water pollution. To minimize environmental pollution, use of slow-release fertilizer (SRF) in agricultural practices is an important and effective method. Different materials have been used so far to formulate SRF, but SRF from wood is a unique technique which reflects a new dimension of wood use. In this aspect, present study was designed to develop a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer using three kinds of woodchips: Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.), eunsasi poplar (Populus tomentiglandulosa T. Lee), and konara oak (Quercus serrata Thunb.). Fertilizers were prepared from woodchips after full-cell treated with a saturated solution (2140 g/l at 25°C) of ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3). The morphology of woodchip fertilizer was investigated by using a field-emission electron microscope (FE-SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer to locate NH4NO3 in woodchips. Deposition of nitrogen in the cell lumen was verified by FE-SEM. Deposition inside the cell wall was confirmed by EDX mapping. This study also evaluated the release pattern of nitrogen from impregnated woodchips in distilled water for 768 h and found that nitrogen was released from poplar, pine, and oak in a slow-release pattern. The encapsulated nutrient in the void volume of wood facilitated the slow release. The above findings confirm that woodchip fertilizers can be used as a slow-release nitrogen source for plants.

References

  1. Akelah A (1996) Novel utilizations of conventional agrochemicals by controlled release formulation. Mater Sci Eng C4:83–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaviv A (2000) Advances in controlled-release fertilizers. Adv Agron 71:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catanzaro CJ, Williams KA, Sauve RJ (1998) Slow release versus water soluble fertilization affects nutrient leaching and growth of potted chrysanthemum. J Plant Nutr 21:1025–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rathier TM, Frink CR (1989) Nitrate in runoff water from container-grown juniper and Alberta spruce under different irrigation and N fertilization regimes. J Environ Hort 7:32–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma GC (1979) Controlled-release fertilizers and horticultural applications. Scientia Hort 11:107–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang FL, Alva AK (1996) Leaching of nitrogen from slow-release urea sources in sandy soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1454–1458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan A, Moore JA, Wenny DL (2004) Growth and nutrition of container-grown ponderosa pine seedlings with controlled-release fertilizer incorporated in the root plug. Ann For Sci 61: 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddell P, Webb MJ, Poa D, Aihuna D (1999) Incorporation of slow-release fertilisers into nursery media. New Forest 18: 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Puértolas J, Gil L, Pardos JA (2003) Effects of nutritional status and seedling size on field performance of Pinus halepensis planted on former arable land in the Mediterranean basin. Forestry 76:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed SA, Chun SK (2007) Effects of environmental friendly slow-releasing woodchip fertilizer on cabbage production. For Stud China 9:246–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tlustoš P, Blackmer AM (1992) Release of nitrogen from ureaform fractions as influenced by soil pH. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1807–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed SA, Chong SH, Hong SH, Kim AJ, Chun SK (2010) Effect of moisture content and wood structure on the amenability of Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) to liquid treatment. J Korean Wood Sci Technol 38:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iida I, Yusuf S, Watanabe U, Imamura Y (2002) Liquid penetration of precompressed wood VII: combined treatment of precompression and extraction in hot water on the liquid penetration of wood. J Wood Sci 48:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen PYS, Sucoff EI, Hossfeld R (1970) The effect of cations on the permeability of wood to aqueous solution. Holzforschung 24:65–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Banks WB (1972) Factors affecting the introduction of preservatives into wood. Pesticide Sci 3:219–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bulmer C (2000) Reclamation of forest soils with excavator tillage and organic amendments. Forest Ecol Manag 133:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Entry JA, Wood BH, Edwards JH, Wood CW (1997) Influence of organic by-products and nitrogen source on chemical and microbiological status of an agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 24: 196–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD (1985) Soil fertility and fertilizers. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eviner VT, Chapin FS, Vaughn CE (2000) Nutrient manipulations in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed SA, Park HD, Chun SK (2005) Effect of pressure on liquid absorbance in main wood species of Pinaceae grown in Korea using safranine under vacuum. J Korea Furnit Soc 16:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plank CO (1992) Plant analysis reference procedures for the southern region of the United States. South Coop Ser Bull 368

  22. Kim BJ, Back JH, Lee BG (2000) Chemical properties of slow-released nitrogen fertilizer using waste paper slurry. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 33:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed SA (2010) The effects of woodchip fertilizer on rice and tree seedlings. Ph.D. Thesis, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hassler CC, Slahor JJ, DeGroot RC, Gardner DJ (1998) Preservative treatment evaluation of five Appalachian hardwoods at two moisture contents. Forest Prod J 48:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maass O (1953) The problem of penetration. Pulp Pap Mag Canada 54:98–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rydholm SA (1965) Pulping processes. Interscience, New York, p 1269

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stamm AJ (1953) Diffusion and penetration mechanism of liquids into wood. Pulp Pap Mag Canada 54:54–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoadley RB (2000) Understanding wood. Taunton Press, Newtown, p 211

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stamm AJ (1963) Permeability of wood to fluids. Forest Prod J 13:503–507

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paranyi NI, Rabinovitch W (1955) Determination of penetration rate of liquid media into wood using a quartz spiral balance. Pulp Pap Mag Canada 56:1164–1170

    Google Scholar 

  31. Waldron L, Cooper P, Ung T (2006) Modeling in the leaching of inorganic components of wood preservatives in service. In: Townsend TG, Solo-Gabriele H (eds) Environmental impacts of treated wood. Taylor and Francis, Florida, pp 139–155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su Kyoung Chun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, S.A., Kim, J.I., Park, K.M. et al. Ammonium nitrate-impregnated woodchips: a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer for plants. J Wood Sci 57, 295–301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-011-1178-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-011-1178-x

Key words