Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society
Table 2 Model predicted peak inter-story drifts versus test results
From: Seismic performance of post and beam timber buildings I: model development and verification
Shake table test | Sensor location | Peak inter-story drift (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st story | 2nd story | 3rd story | ||
150% Kobe JMA | X1 | 56.6 (−4.0%) | 25.6 (18.0%) | 11.3 (−28.5%) |
X2 | 34.0 (−12.6) | 23.4 (0.4%) | 9.9 (−2.0%) | |
X3 | 24.9 (15.7%) | 18.7 (12.5%) | 7.9 (36.3%) | |
Y1 | 28.7 (28.4%) | 11.9 (−1.6%) | 3.9 (17.6%) | |
Y2 | 20.5 (24.3%) | 18.9 (19.6%) | 5.2 (27%) | |
Y3 | 22.4 (11.1%) | 23.0 (24.6%) | 6.3 (−11.8%) | |
200% Kobe JMA | X1 | 194.5 (−0.7%) | 87.5 (−4.4%) | 24.0 (−34.4%) |
X2 | 131.0 (1.9%) | 64.4 (−8.7%) | 21.9 (−4.8%) | |
X3 | 74.3 (−7.7%) | 29.7 (−14.3%) | 17.5 (23.2%) | |
Y1 | 51.8 (17.2%) | 34.8 (7%) | 7.0 (22.8%) | |
Y2 | 50.8 (23.0%) | 31.2 (18.0%) | 9.5 (3.2%) | |
Y3 | 48.4 (13.9%) | 25.9 (9.7%) | 7.3 (12.3%) | |