Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 4 Comparisons of the model performance with different within-groups correlation structures

From: Modeling the effects of growth rate on the intra-tree variation in basic density in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa)

Model

Correlation structure

No. of parameters

AIC

BIC

LogLik

Test

LRT

p value

1.2.1

Independent

12

4646

4697

−2311.2

   

1.2.1.1

AR (1)

13

4623

4678

−2298.7

1.2.1 versus 1.2.1.1

25.0

<0.0001

1.2.1.2

AR (2)

14

4621

4680

−2296.6

1.2.1.1 versus 1.2.1.2

4.1

0.0419

1.2.1.3

MA (1)

13

4632

4686

−2303.0

1.2.1.2 versus 1.2.1.3

12.7

0.0004

1.2.1.4

MA (2)

14

4621

4680

−2296.7

1.2.1.3 versus 1.2.1.4

12.6

0.0004

1.2.1.5

ARMA (1,1)

14

4622

4681

−2297.2

   

1.2.1.6

ARMA (1,2)

15

4622

4685

−2296.0

1.2.1.5 versus 1.2.1.6

1.7

0.1872

1.2.1.7

ARMA (2,1)

15

4623

4685

−2296.4

   
  1. AR autoregressive model, MA moving average correlation model, ARMA mixed autoregressive-moving average model, Other abbreviations are same in Table 2