Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 2 Surface composition of the wood dowel and welding interface determined by XPS

From: Mechanics and pyrolysis analyses of rotation welding with pretreated wood dowels

Test group

Samples

Elements (%)

Ratio (%)

C

O

N

O/C

Group A

Wood dowel

76.52 (1.24)

22.92 (1.30)

0.56 (0.07)

29.98 (2.19)

Welding interface

70.79 (1.58)

28.69 (1.37)

0.52 (0.22)

40.56 (2.83)

Group B (CuCl2)

Wood dowel

75.31 (2.75)

24.11 (2.82)

0.58 (0.17)

32.13 (4.95)

Welding interface

70.43 (3.07)

29.05 (3.11)

0.52 (0.04)

41.43 (6.21)

Test group

Samples

Carbon C1s components (%)

C1

C2

C3

C4

Group A

Wood dowel

65.23 (2.97)

25.14 (2.80)

6.68 (1.87)

2.95 (1.69)

Welding interface

56.81 (5.02)

31.19 (6.19)

10.07 (2.26)

1.93 (1.81)

Group B (CuCl2)

Wood dowel

61.54 (2.12)

30.55 (3.88)

5.46 (2.50)

2.45 (1.54)

Welding interface

48.73 (3.14)

39.82 (4.36)

9.68 (2.20)

1.77 (1.02)

  1. 1, wood dowel and welding interface of group A meant untreated samples; 2, wood dowel and welding interface of group B (CuCl2) meant treated samples; 3, elements (%) of C, O, and N meant the amount of these elements in the samples, respectively; 4, C1: C–C/C–H bonds, 284.6 eV; C2: C–O bonds, 286.5 eV; C3: C=O/O–C–O bonds, 287.9 eV; C4: O=C–O bonds, 289.2 eV; 5, the ratio of O/C meant the ratio of the amount of O and C; 6, test results were the mean value of three samples; 7, values in parentheses were standard deviation