Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 3 Comparisons of measured and predicted values of Ply-lam

From: Moment and shear capacity of Ply-lam composed with plywood and structural timber under out-of-plane bending

Structural property

Shear test

Bending test

Measurement

Prediction

Measurement

Prediction

By reference value

By tested value

By reference value

By tested value

Bending stiffness (1012 × N mm2)

 Average value

   

0.48a

0.40b

 

 Differencec

    

16.7%

 

Moment capacity (106 × N mm)

 5th percentile value

   

14.6d

5.2e

13.7f

 Difference

    

64.4%

6.2%

Shear capacity (kN)

 5th percentile value of measured data

51.6g

48.0h

55.8i

   

 Difference

 

7.0%

− 8.1%

   

 5th percentile value by CMLE

62.4j

48.0

55.8

   

 Difference

 

23.1%

10.6%

   
  1. aAverage value of experimental data measured by Eq. 2
  2. bPredicted value by transformed section of Ply-lam from Eq. 3
  3. cDifference between measured and predicted value: (measured value − predicted value)/measured value × 100
  4. d5th percentile value of experimental data measured by Eq. 4
  5. ePredicted value by Eq. 5 and reference value of No. 3 visual grade timber in Korean Design Standard in Table 1
  6. fPredicted value by Eq. 5 and 5th percentile value of No. 3 visual grade timber in experimental data in Table 1
  7. g5th percentile value of experimental data measured by Eq. 6
  8. hPredicted value by Eq. 8 and rolling shear strength of plywood in Korean Design Standard in Table 1
  9. iPredicted value by Eq. 8 and rolling shear strength of plywood in experimental data in Table 1
  10. j5th percentile value by censored maximum likelihood evaluation (bending failure was counted as a censored data)