Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 2 Comparison of properties of windmill palm fibers with other natural fibers

From: Structural, chemical, and multi-scale mechanical characterization of waste windmill palm fiber (Trachycarpus fortunei)

Natural fibers

Chemical composition (%)

Structural characterization

Tensile properties

α-Cellulose

Hemicellulose

Lignin

Ash

MFA(°)

CrI (%)

Tensile modulus (GPa)

Tensile strength (MPa)

Failure strain (%)

Windmill palm (this study)

Inner layer

35.5

22.5

36.4

1.4

38.8 ± 1.5

45.7

3.5 ± 0.8

132.0 ± 27.8

17.6 ± 2.9

Middle layer

34.3

24.7

36.8

3.9

39.2 ± 1.3

49.2

2.7 ± 0.4

73.7 ± 17.2

10.5 ± 2.9

Outer layer

34.7

25.3

38.3

1.1

39.4 ± 1.0

46.7

2.9 ± 0.5

72.8 ± 21.2

10.0 ± 4.7

Windmill palm [9, 12]

28.2

20.6

44.1

37.8–42.2

30.5–73

0.3–1.3

82.1–170.1

22.6–55.2

Date palm [21]

45 ± 3

28 ± 2

17 ± 0.3

1.7 ± 0.1

26.1 ± 14.2

41 ± 3

1.8 ± 0.6

131 ± 34

20.9 ± 7.6

Oil palm [2]

42.7–65

17.1–33.5

13.2–25.31

1.3–6.0

46

0.6–9

50–400

4–18

Sugar palm [23]

43.8–44.5

8.9–10.0

39.5–41.9

0.9–1.3

3.9–4.3

211–233

15.8–20.6

Piassava palm [20]

31.6

48.4

2.6 ± 0.4

131.1 ± 27.1

11.9 ± 4.3

Coir [35]

34.3–53.6

29.1–22.3

24–36.4

37.1–39

4.8–18

94.3–119.8

5.5–6.3

Flax [24]

72.6

8.7

3.2

4.5

20.8

520

1.9

Jute [24]

46.2

12.5

15.4

8

24.6

390

1.5

Sisal [24]

45.3

20.4

15.1

20

18.7

400

2.7