Effects of an innovative densification process on mechanical and physical properties of beech and Norway spruce veneers

Journal of Wood Science

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 2 Tukey’s test on MOE data for beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) densified veneer samples

Species	Treatment intensity	MOE mean difference	95% confidence interval		P value
Species	Treatment intensity	MOE mean difference	Lower bound	Upper bound	P value
Beech	90–60 s	1082.2783	− 1063.4571	3228.0138	0.55
	300–60 s	1525.3446	− 620.3909	3671.0800	0.25
	Control–60 s	− 1971.9088	− 4117.6442	173.8267	0.08
	300–90 s	443.0662	− 1702.6692	2588.8017	0.95
	Control–90 s	− 3054.1871	− 5199.9225	− 908.4516	< 0.05
	Control–300 s	− 3497.2533	− 5642.9888	− 1351.5179	< 0.05
Norway spruce	60 s–control	2391.9510	1591.4425	3192.4595	< 0.05
	90 s–control	2621.5530	1821.0445	3422.0615	< 0.05
	300 s–control	2175.6307	1375.1221	2976.1392	< 0.05
	480 s–control	1256.6560	456.1475	2057.1645	< 0.05
	90–60 s	229.6020	− 570.9065	1030.1105	0.93
	300–60 s	− 216.3203	− 1016.8289	584.1882	0.9450687
	480–60 s	− 1135.2950	− 1935.8035	− 334.7865	0.0012785
	300–90 s	− 445.9223	− 1246.4309	354.5862	0.5390946
	480–90 s	− 1364.8970	− 2165.4055	− 564.3885	0.0000559
	480–300 s	− 918.9747	− 1719.4832	− 118.4661	0.0156799