Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 1 Results of the linear mixed models with affective states as dependent variables

From: A pilot study examining the suitability of the mental arithmetic task and single-item measures of affective states to assess affective, physiological, and attention restoration at a wooden desk

Outcome

Predictor

Estimate

SE

95% CI

df

t

p

Arousal

Intercept

3.82

0.50

2.83 to 4.80

35.17

7.59

< 0.001

Condition: Wood

− 0.18

0.71

− 1.58 to 1.21

35.17

− 0.26

0.800

Phase: Task (1)

2.00

0.45

1.11 to 2.89

40.00

4.41

 < 0.001

Phase: Recovery

0.73

0.45

− 0.16 to 1.62

40.00

1.60

0.117

Wood * Task (1)

− 0.27

0.64

− 1.53 to 0.98

40.00

− 0.43

0.673

Wood * Recovery

− 0.36

0.64

− 1.62 to 0.89

40.00

− 0.57

0.574

Pleasure

Intercept

5.64

0.56

4.55 to 6.73

44.06

10.12

 < 0.001

Condition: Wood

0.18

0.79

− 1.36 to 1.72

44.06

0.23

0.818

Phase: Task (1)

− 0.91

0.60

− 2.08 to 0.26

40.00

− 1.52

0.136

Phase: Recovery

− 0.91

0.60

− 2.08 to 0.26

40.00

− 1.52

0.136

Wood * Task (1)

0.09

0.84

− 1.56 to 1.75

40.00

0.11

0.915

Wood * Recovery

0.09

0.84

− 1.56 to 1.75

40.00

0.11

0.915

  1. Significant predictors (p < 0.05) are shown in bold
  2. SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom; t: test statistic t; p: p-value
  3. *Interaction between predictors