Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 4 Results of the binomial mixed model with MAT response correctness as the dependent variable

From: A pilot study examining the suitability of the mental arithmetic task and single-item measures of affective states to assess affective, physiological, and attention restoration at a wooden desk

Outcome

Predictor

Estimate

SE

CI

z

p

Correct responses

Intercept

11.86

3.37

6.79 to 20.71

8.70

 < 0.001

Condition: Wood

1.31

0.55

0.58 to 2.96

0.65

0.513

Phase: Task (2)

2.21

0.54

1.38 to 3.56

3.28

0.001

Wood * Task (2)

0.78

0.29

0.37 to 1.63

− 0.66

0.512

  1. The estimates represent odds ratios. Significant predictors (p < 0.05) are shown in bold
  2. SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval; z: test statistic z; p: p-value
  3. *Interaction between predictors