Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society
Table 6 Comparison between experimental results and calculation results for axial bolt force ratio (Th: 30Â mm)
Th [mm] | S [mm] | Bolt Number | Axial bolt force ratio | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Se.1 A → B → C → D | Se.2 A → D → B → C | Se.3 A → C → B → D | Se.4 B → C → A → D | |||||||||||
Exp. | Cal. | Cal./Exp. | Exp. | Cal. | Cal./Exp. | Exp. | Cal. | Cal./Exp. | Exp. | Cal. | Cal./Exp. | |||
30 | 48 | A | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.59 | 0.68 | – | – | – |
B | 0.79 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.54 | 0.65 | – | – | – | 0.78 | − 0.08 | 0.00 | ||
C | 0.78 | 0.52 | 0.67 | – | – | – | 0.70 | − 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.64 | ||
D | – | – | – | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.58 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
60 | A | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.91 | – | – | – | |
B | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.99 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.90 | – | – | – | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.63 | ||
C | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.91 | – | – | – | 0.78 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.91 | ||
D | – | – | – | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.77 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
72 | A | 0.80 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.01 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.98 | – | – | – | |
B | 0.78 | 0.84 | 1.07 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.99 | – | – | – | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.90 | ||
C | 0.75 | 0.85 | 1.13 | – | – | – | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.01 | ||
D | – | – | – | 0.83 | 0.85 | 1.03 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
84 | A | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.02 | – | – | – | |
B | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.04 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.99 | – | – | – | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.91 | ||
C | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.04 | – | – | – | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.02 | ||
D | – | – | – | 0.86 | 0.92 | 1.06 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||