Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Table 4 The AIC values of models for cumulative annual ring width and basic density

From: Modeling of radial growth curves and radial variation of basic density in Chamaecyparis obtusa planted in two progeny test sites

Trait

Model

Random effect

AIC

b0

b1

b2

Hitachi

Kiso

CRW

I-i-f

Family

  

65,839

38,678

 

I-ii-f

 

Family

 

68,469

40,017

 

I-iii-f

  

Family

–

–

 

I-i-b

Block

  

65,830

38,677

 

I-ii-b

 

Block

 

68,462

40,015

 

I-iii-b

  

Block

–

–

BD

II-i-f

Family

  

− 17,130

− 11,091

 

II-ii-f

 

Family

 

− 17,640

–

 

II-iii-f

  

Family

–

–

 

II-iv-f

Family

Family

 

− 18,146

− 11,640

 

II-v-f

 

Family

Family

− 18,790

− 11,965

 

II-vi-f

Family

 

Family

–

–

 

II-i-b

Block

  

− 16,396

− 10,841

 

II-ii-b

 

Block

 

− 16,385

− 10,842

 

II-iii-b

  

Block

− 16,363

− 10,841

 

II-iv-b

Block

Block

 

− 16,402

− 10,839

 

II-v-b

 

Block

Block

–

–

 

II-vi-b

Block

 

Block

–

− 10,837

  1. CRW, cumulative annual ring width; BD, basic density. –, the model failed to converge or the model was not applied. Bold values indicate the minimum AIC values among developed models. Model forms refer to Table 2