Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Manufacture and properties of Miscanthus–wood particle composite boards

Abstract

Miscanthus sacchariflorus straw was used as a raw material for the manufacture of Miscanthus–wood particle composite board with Douglas-fir particles in ratios of 100/0, 80/20, 60/40, 40/60, 20/80, and 0/100. A commercial phenol–formaldehyde resin was used as a binder at 9 and 11 % for target densities of 0.50 and 0.65 g/cm3, respectively. The effects of the Miscanthus/wood particle ratio on the composite board properties were investigated. In addition, the density profile was also examined to improve the understanding of the composite board manufacturing process. Results indicate that the internal bonding value increased drastically in the board containing up to 50 % wood particles, providing a valuable parameter for subsequent research. The board properties were greatly improved with increasing density and binder addition level.

Introduction

Biomass materials have attracted great interest in recent years. Miscanthus is one of the perennial grass, considered to be a suitable crop as a sustainable source of biomass for biopower and biofuels because it has some valuable advantages including good yield, high calorific value (20 kJ/kg if dry matter), and well-described material [1]. Of the 17 known species in the Miscanthus genus, the most important species are M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus, which originate in East Asia including Korea, and M. × giganteus, which is the inter-specific hybrid of tetraploid M. sacchariflorus and diploid M. sinensis [2]. Traditionally, in terms of the ratio of energy content to volume, combustion and pyrolysis are efficient methods for controlling the energy efficiency of Miscanthus [3]. During Miscanthus growth, C4 photosynthesis occurs, which is the primary characteristic enabling this plant to be used in fuel production. In general, few studies have been performed on the use of Miscanthus as a source of bioenergy for fuel [47].

With the increasing consumption of wood-based materials and scarcity of wood resources, it is inevitable that some substitutions are needed and wood residues should be fully utilized. So far, much research has been devoted to the use of non-wood lignocellulosic materials, such as reeds, wheat, and rice straw, as a partial or complete substitute for wood in the preparation of boards for structural and non-structural panel applications. Low density straw panels have already been suggested for application in thermal and acoustic insulation [8]. Yang et al. [9] using rice straw manufactured insulation board. The composite boards prepared with randomly cut rice straw and wood particles with low specific gravity were found to be suitable as a sound absorbing insulation material. Ajiwe et al. [10] produced ceiling boards from agricultural waste, such as rice husks and saw dust. The results confirmed that the board produced was similar to a commercial board. Han et al. [1114]. conducted a series of studies using reeds and wheat straw as material for preparing particleboard and examined the effect of particle size and board density on the board properties. In addition, silicon coupling agents were used to improve the bonding ability between the reeds and wheat particles and urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin, and mechanism underlying the bonding improvement was investigated. Nikvash et al. [15] used agri-fibers, bagasse, canola, and hemp, as well as industrial wood chips in various proportions ranging from 0 to 100 % to make wood composite panels and suggested that one possible application for those panels is furniture production.

The biochemical composition of Miscanthus, as determined classically, is (wt% dry matter) 45 wt% cellulose, 30 wt% hemicellulose, and 21 wt% lignin [6], similar to wood components, which enables Miscanthus to serve as an alternative to wood in panels. Therefore, it is necessary to identify alternative applications so that these materials can be fully utilized for the benefit of humankind and the environment. Even though Miscanthus currently lack industry utilization for bio-based composite products, given the abundant supply, the potential to utilize this material is great. The objective of this research was to investigate the properties of Miscanthus–wood particle composite boards as a function of the ratio of Miscanthus particles to wood shavings to produce composite panels with acceptable properties for interior applications.

Materials and methods

Materials

Miscanthus straw, obtained from the National Institute of Crop Science of Korea and industrially produced Douglas-fir wood shavings were used as the raw materials in this study. The Miscanthus straw was crushed into small particles and subsequently screened by vibration on a 10-mesh sieve. The Douglas-fir wood shavings were also screened using the same mesh. All the particles used were 100 % those remaining on the 10-mesh sieve, 0.15–0.43 mm thickness, 2.4–3.9 mm width and 19.5–30.3 mm length for Miscanthus particles, and 0.08–0.58 mm thickness, 7.2–13.8 mm width, 7.4–11.3 mm length for wood particles. The specific types of particle are presented in Fig. 1. All particles were air-dried to about 6 % moisture content. The binder used to manufacture the board was commercial phenol–formaldehyde (PF) resin (PHENOLITE TD-2207) with a solid content of 67–71 %, a viscosity of 380–530 mP s (25 °C), and a density of 1.205–1.215 g/cm3 (Kangnam Polytec. Co., Korea). A rotary blender was used for the blending, with the binder being applied under 7–10 kgf/cm2 pressure using an atomization nozzle.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The particle types of Miscanthus and Douglas-fir

Board manufacture

Miscanthus–wood particle composite boards of 35 cm × 35 cm × 1.2 cm were manufactured at target densities of 0.5 and 0.65 g/cm3. In an attempt to optimize Miscanthus/wood particle ratio, the following six ratios were tested: 100/0, 80/20, 60/40, 40/60, 20/80, and 0/100. The resin was sprayed onto the particles in a blender with a resin content of 9 and 11 % based on the dry weight of the particles. The resin-sprayed particles were then hand-formed in a forming box. And 50 s, press closing time, was required for the press plates reaching the target board thickness of 12 mm from a mat height of 70 mm. A three-step hot pressing cycle was employed to hot pressing, first step with pressure of 3.43 MPa (9 min), second step 2.94 MPa (2 min) and third step 1.96 MPa (1 min), respectively. In addition, the platen temperature was fixed at 180 °C. Four replicates of each board were fabricated under the same conditions for a total of 48 boards.

Physical and mechanical properties tests

Prior to testing the physical and mechanical properties, the boards were conditioned at 20 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5 % relative humidity (RH) until they reached a constant weight. The physical and mechanical tests were carried out in accordance with Korean standard KS F 3104-2006. The internal bonding (IB) and thickness swelling (TS) tests were performed in replicates of eight and four, respectively, at a size of 50 mm × 50 mm × 12 mm. Eight replicates were prepared for the modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elastic (MOE) tests with samples of 220 mm × 50 mm × 12 mm. Prior to the IB test, the density profiles of two samples were determined.

Results and discussion

The influence of the Miscanthus to wood particle ratio on the properties of the boards

The influence of the Miscanthus/wood particle ratio on boards with a density of 0.50 g/cm3 and 9 % resin content (LB) and on boards with a density of 0.65 g/cm3 and a resin content of 11 % (HB) was determined; the results are shown in Table 1. In general, the properties of the boards improved as wood particle content increased regardless of the density and resin content. In fact, like rice, wheat, and reed straw described in other studies, those straws have been indentified as a material presenting bonding difficulty [11, 16, 17]. The wax and silica layer results in a low surface polarity, and a subsequently low compatibility between the resin and straw. Meanwhile, the low porosity of the outer layer was responsible for the poor resin penetration and diffusion. Without proper wetting, good bonding cannot be expected. Therefore, incorporating wood particles into the straw material is one of the methods used to improve the bonding quality of the straw board.

Table 1 Properties of Miscanthus–wood particle composite boards

In the case of the MOR and IB, when the wood particle content increased from 20 to 80 %, despite poor values, the IB value increased by 67.7 % for the LB board and more than 3 times for the HB board (from 0.048 to 0.163 N/mm2). In addition, the MOR increased from 6.51 to 12.24 N/mm2 for the HB board. From Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5, it is evident that more obvious improvements were achieved with an increasing wood particle proportion for HB boards, whereas only a slight change was observed for LB boards. Furthermore, the IB and MOR values were markedly improved when the Miscanthus/wood particle ratios were below 60/40, which was consistent with what was reported in other studies [9, 15, 16]. The significant improvement might be attributed to the increased bonding contact area between the resin and particles with the increasing content of wood particles, which have better wettability. A considerable reduction in TS was observed with increasing wood particle content. It is considered that an increase in both the IB strength and wood particle proportion might reduce water penetration. As for MOE, it is largely influenced by the particle shape factor (length/width ratio). From Fig. 1 it can be observed that length/width ratio of +10-mesh Miscanthus particles is higher than that of wood particles which are short along the grain direction. Consequently despite of increased bonding strength with increasing wood particles, the MOE decreased drastically when the board was totally made by wood particles (Fig. 5), especially for the LB board. In the case of HB boards, increasing wood particles proportions contributed to increased MOE, however, no obvious effect for LB boards. In contrast, the MOR increased with increasing wood particle content in the HB board, and this was probably due to improved bonding.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Influence of Miscanthus/wood ratio on TS

Fig. 3
figure 3

Influence of Miscanthus/wood ratio on IB

Fig. 4
figure 4

Influence of Miscanthus/wood ratio on MOR

Fig. 5
figure 5

Influence of Miscanthus/wood ratio on MOE

The influence of density and resin content on the properties of boards

As stated above, when the Miscanthus/wood particle ratio was below 60/40, the board properties were enhanced significantly. Therefore, the 40/60 ratio was used to compare the properties of boards with different densities and resin content. The TS after immersion in water for 24 h tended to increase with increasing density. Even though increasing resin content indeed enhanced the bonding strength in certain degree which was confirmed by increased IB value, higher density could cause greater spring-back of the compacted particles. The increased inter-particle bonding strength is relatively week to offset this spring-back, resulting in TS value of HB board is greater than that of LB board. A similar trend was observed for the IB, MOR, and MOE, all of which increased drastically with increasing density and resin content. These changing properties were caused by an increase in the surface contact between the resin and particles, leading to improved bonding quality.

Vertical density profile

Table 2 shows the face and core densities from the vertical profile data for all boards. In general, the core/average densities, around 85 and 90 % for boards with densities of 0.65 and 0.50 g/cm3, were slightly higher than that of a conventional wood particle board with a reference value of 67 %. This is probably due to the homogeneous structure of the composite board. Meanwhile, according to Dai et al. [18], the slighter the density variation, the better the permeability. Therefore, the data indicate that during the hot pressing process, the mat had good permeability, which resulted in increased consolidation, faster heat transformation to the core, and thus more rapid curing of the resin. It is reported that permeability is linked to the existence of voids between mat elements [1820]. Miscanthus particles are quite different from wood particles in terms of their geometric shapes and size distributions, as opposed to the wood particles (Fig. 1). Consequently, when the Miscanthus and wood particles were mixed together, more voids formed between them.

Table 2 Vertical density distributions of boards

In general, the core/average density ratio of the LB boards was lower than that of the HB boards. Specifically, the HB board made with a ratio of 20/80 (Miscanthus/wood) had a higher core/average ratio, which was strongly correlated with a better IB value of a board made under the same conditions. The density profile distribution of that board, as well as the board with a ratio of 80/20 (Miscanthus/wood) is shown in Fig. 6. For comparison, the density profiles of the LB boards with 20/80 and 80/20 ratios are graphed in Fig. 7. Increasing density and resin content was expected to result in better mat consolidation. With the same final thickness, the greater the compaction ratio and the thickness ratio, the more uniform the mat [21].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Density profile of Miscanthus–wood-based board with 0.65 g/cm3 target density

Fig. 7
figure 7

Density profile of Miscanthus–wood-based board with 0.50 g/cm3 target density

Conclusions

The Miscanthus/wood particle ratio was found to have a significant influence on the improvement of board properties, particularly for boards with a density of 0.65 g/cm3 and 11 % resin content. In a whole, increasing wood particles proportion contributed to increased MOE for HB boards but no obvious effect for LB boards. When the Miscanthus/wood particle ratio was below 60/40, the enhancements were more obvious despite HB board experienced more spring-back, resulting in higher TS. Taking making full use of Miscanthus into consideration, approximately 50/50 of Miscanthus/wood ratio, further investigation for better mechanical properties is necessary. Current composite board properties are not satisfactory and must be improved. The vertical density profiles study shows that during hot pressing the mats were well densified, which is related to the good permeability of the composite boards.

References

  1. Fischer G, Prieler S, van Velthuizen H (2005) Biomass potentials of Miscanthus, willow and poplar: results and policy implications for Eastern Europe, Northern and Central Asia. Biomass Bioenerg 28:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moon Y-H, Koo B-C, Choi Y-H (2010) Development of “Miscanthus” the promising bioenergy crop. Korean J Weed Sci 30(4):330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorge S, Jeguirim M, Trouve G (2011) Thermal degradation of Miscanthus pellets: kinetics and aerosols characterization. Waste Biomass Valor 2:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michel R, Finqueneisel G, Zimny T (2006) Miscantgus giganteus straw and pellets as sustainable fuels and raw material for activation carbon. Environ Chem Lett 4:185–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Jong W, Pirone A, Wojtowicz MA (2003) Prolysis of Miscanthus giganteus and wood pellets: TG-FITIR analysis and reaction kinetics. Fuel 82:1139–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collura S, Azambre B, Weber JV (2005) Thermal behaviour of Miscanthus grasses, an alternative biological fuel. Environ Chem Lett 3:95–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Collura S, Azambre B, Weber JV (2006) Miscanthus giganteus straw and pellets as sustainable fules combustion and emission tests. Environ Chem Lett 4:75–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boquillon N, Elbez G, Schonfeld U (2004) Properties of wheat straw particleboards bonded with different types of resin. J Wood Sci 50:230–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang H-J, Kim D-J, Kim H-J (2003) Rice straw–wood particle composite for soundab sorbing wooden construction materials. Bioresour Technol 86:117–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ajiwe VIE, Okeke CA, Ekwuozor SC, Uba IC (1998) A pilot plant for production of ceiling boards from rice husks. Bioresour Technol 66:41–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Han G, Zhang C, Zhang D, Umemura K, Kawai S (1998) Upgrading of urea formaldehyde-bonded reed and wheat straw particleboards using silane coupling agents. J Wood Sci 44:282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Han G, Umemura K, Kajita S, Kawai H (1999) Improvement mechanism of bondability in UF-bonded reed and wheat straw boards by silane coupling agent and extraction treatment. J Wood Sci 45:299–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han G, Umemura K, Wong ED, Zhang M, Kawai S (2001) Effects of silane coupling agent level and extraction treatment on the properties of UF-bonded reed and wheat straw particleboards. J Wood Sci 47:18–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han G, Umemura K, Zhang M, Honda T, Kawai S (2001) Development of high-performance UF-bonded reed and wheat straw medium-density fiberboard. J Wood Sci 47:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikvash N, Kraft R, Kharazipour A, Euring M (2010) Comparative properties of bagasse, canola and hemp particle boards. Eur J Wood Prod 68:323–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu ZM, Wang FH, Wang XM (2004) Surface structure and dynamic adhesive wettability of wheat straw. Wood Fiber Sci 36(2):239–24917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen JH, Liu ZM, Li J, Niu J (2011) Wettability changes of wheat straw treated with chemicals and enzymes. J For Res 22(1):107–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai C, Yu C, Zhou X (2005) Heat and mass transfer in wood composite panels during hot pressing. Part II. Modeling void formation and mat permeability. Wood Fiber Sci 37(2):242–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dai C, Wasylciw W, Jin J (2004) Comparison of the pressing behavior of wood particleboard and strawboard. Wood Sci Technol 38:529–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong ED, Zhang M, Wang Q, Kaiwai S (1999) Formation of the density profile and its effects on the properties of particleboard. Wood Sci Technol 33:327–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai C, Steiner PR (1997) On horizontal density variation in randomly-formed shot-fiber wood composite boards. Compos A 28(A):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work is supported by the research fund of the Rural Development Administration, Korea, under project No. PJ0079674.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Yu Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, HJ., Oh, SW. & Wen, MY. Manufacture and properties of Miscanthus–wood particle composite boards. J Wood Sci 58, 459–464 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-012-1262-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-012-1262-x

Keywords

  • Miscanthus (M. sacchariflorus) straw
  • Wood particle
  • Composite board
  • Density profile