Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

  • Original article
  • Published:

Effect of different silicon sources on rattan-based silicon carbide ceramic prepared by one-step pyrolysis


Rattan-based silicon carbide (R-SiC) ceramics, R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi, were successfully prepared from silica (SiO2) sol and silicon (Si) powder, respectively. The rattan powder was impregnated, respectively, with SiO2 sol at ambient temperature and liquid melt-Si at high temperature. This was followed by one-step direct pyrolysis at 1500 °C under an argon (Ar) atmosphere. The final SiC samples were analyzed using mass analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX), and nitrogen (N2) physisorption techniques. Experimental results showed that the mass residual of R-SiCSi (42.56 wt%) was almost equal to R-SiCSiO2 (42.45 wt%). However, R-SiCSiO2 had a higher yield of SiC, a higher specific surface area and a more intact porous morphology preserved from the rattan biomass. In addition, some rod-like SiC whiskers and tablet-like SiC particles were found in R-SiCSiO2. By comparison, R-SiCSi had a large amount of unreacted Si, as well as certain amount of SiC and unreacted C. Thus, it can be concluded that SiO2 sols are more appropriate for use in preparation of SiC from rattan, whatever the porous microstructure, yield, and purity of SiC.


Silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics have a wide variety of potential applications due to their excellent performances, such as extremely high hardness, high thermal resistance, high chemical stability, good mechanical properties, and good electronic properties [14]. Several studies have reported the preparation of SiC ceramic derived from naturally occurring plant biomass, such as wood, bamboo, and agricultural waste [510]. Naturally, occurring plants have complex hierarchical pore structure due to long-term genetic evolution and optimization [11]. The specific pore structure can provide the access passage, storage space, and reaction space for external silicon (Si) sources. These structures can be preserved in the final SiC ceramic samples. In this way, plant-based SiC ceramics both possess unique biomorphic porous construction and traditional ceramic properties, having attracted much attention and led to extensive research.

In general, plant-based SiC ceramics can be prepared from different Si sources via two main routes, which are direct carbonization of Si [1113] and carbothermal reduction of silica (SiO2) [14, 15]. The direct carbonization of Si contains liquid Si infiltration (LSI) and vapor Si infiltration [16, 17] according to the state of Si. Liquid Si or vapor Si spontaneously infiltrates the pore structure of raw plants or their carbon templates. The Si source involved in carbothermal reduction of SiO2 mainly refers to SiO2 sol [1820]. First, the raw biomass or carbon template is generally impregnated with SiO2 sol once or several times. They are then placed in a high-temperature condition to allow for the formation of SiC. Many previous studies have reported that the two main existing routes can produce SiC ceramics from plant biomasses that have multiple and special properties, such as low density, high surface area to volume, high permeability, and high specific strength [21, 22]. However, the differences between SiC ceramics derived from two main routes have not been recognized clearly. To compensate for this problem, researchers are expected to carry out a study to compare these two different SiC ceramics and to find and determine the effects of different preparation routes or different Si sources on the SiC ceramics.

Rattan is a highly important non-timber forest resource next to wood and bamboo without branches and seasonal rings, which exhibits good processability owing to its low density, light weight, and high toughness [23, 24]. Rattan possesses hierarchical pore distribution and interconnecting pore structure (~300, 6–20, and 1–3 µm), and the total porosity (55–68%) of rattan is higher than those of wood or bamboo [25]. In this context, it is expected that rattan with pore structure would be easier for the infiltration of Si source, e.g., Si powder and SiO2 sol, and increase the intimate contact area between the carbon source (rattan structure) and Si source, making it is possible to promote the formation of SiC at relatively low temperature, high yield, purity, and porosity [8, 10]. Moreover, rattan-based SiC (R-SiC) ceramics are not only synthesized via an environmental-friendly method, but also provide another utilization option for rattan resources. In the past, the processing and utilization of rattan and the preparation of plant-based SiC ceramics have been intensively studied, but investigations into R-SiC ceramics have been limited [2629]. Furthermore, the systematical investigation on the effect of different Si sources (Si powder and SiO2 sol) on SiC ceramics prepared from naturally occurring plant biomass has rarely been addressed. This paper reports on the results of processing of R-SiC ceramic derived from Si powder and SiO2 sol via one-step pyrolysis. In addition, the one-step pyrolysis achieves that SiC can be obtained directly from the natural rattan infiltrated by Si source without the carbonization of natural rattan to form rattan charcoal before the infiltration of Si source. The paper analyzes the differences between these two SiC samples using relevant phase, element, microstructure, and pore characterization techniques. The effect of the Si source on prepared R-SiC ceramics and the superior Si source is determined.

Materials and methods

Preparation of starting materials

Rattan. Daemonorops Margaritae (Hance) Beccari is the only species in China, which was acquired from Hainan province and used in this study. Air-dried rattans selected randomly were first sawed into 3–5 cm cylinder samples perpendicular to the axial direction, and then chopped into strips parallel to the axial direction. Finally, the samples were milled into powder of about 150 μm. The obtained rattan powders were left untreated and stored as a carbon source for the synthesis of the SiC ceramic.

Si powder provided by Beijing Sinoma Synthetic Crystals Co., Ltd. was well mixed with the rattan powder using a planetary ball mill (Retsch PM-100, Germany) at room temperature at a mass ratio of 7:20 to produce rattan/silicon material. The mass ratio was calculated according to the highest carbon yield (15%) of rattan above 1000 °C in preliminary work and the stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 (Si:C) from the reaction: \( {\text{Si}} + {\text {C}} \to {\text {SiC}} \). SiO2 sol (20% solid content by weight in this study) was prepared from the mixture of tetraethoxysilane [Si(OC2H5)4, TEOS], ethyl alcohol [C2H5OH, EtOH], and distilled water [H2O] at a molar ratio of 1:4:4 with the addition of small amount of hydrochloric acid to obtain pH = 2.5. This is the optimal pH for increasing the gelation rate by a sol–gel process as described in the previous studies [3032]. The infiltration of silica sol into rattan powder was accomplished via a vacuum-pressure method. Rattan powder and sufficient silica sol were first blended in a glass beaker, which was then placed into a self-made high-pressure reactor kettle and evacuated for 20 min before being held for 1 h. The kettle was then filled with nitrogen (N2) to raise the pressure to 0.8 MPa and held for 2 h. To remove other solvents and promote full condensation and gelation reaction of the SiO2 sol contained in rattan powder, the infiltrated rattan powder was placed in a constant temperature and humidity chamber at 60 °C and 70% humidity. The infiltrated rattan powder was held in this condition for 2 days, and then dried for 2 h at 60 °C, and, finally, oven dried at 105°C. Thus, the rattan/silica material was prepared, and the mass ratio of SiO2 gel/rattan powder (8:11) in this material was calculated through the 15% carbon yield of rattan and the following formula: \( n = (m_{1} - m_{0} )/m_{0} \), where m 0 was the mass of rattan powder before the sol–gel process and m 1 was the mass of rattan powder after the sol–gel process. The untamped bulk density of rattan/silicon (324 kg/m3) and rattan/silica (410 kg/m3) materials was determined according to the European standard (EN 725-9-2006) [33].

Preparation of SiC ceramic

One-step pyrolysis method was used to prepare SiC ceramics, including carbothermal reduction and direct carbonization. The schematic diagram of the experimental procedure used for the preparation of the R-SiC ceramic sample is shown in Fig. 1. Carbothermal reduction and direct carbonization of two pre-prepared samples, i.e., rattan/silicon (54.7 g) and rattan/silica (50.5 g) material, were, respectively, carried out in a tube furnace at 1500 °C under an argon (Ar) atmosphere to form SiC ceramic. Two samples held by an alumina crucible were placed in the tube furnace and heated. To avoid the formation of micro-cracks in the reactants resulting from the fast heating rate, a multi-step heat treatment process was used. At first, the temperature of the furnace was raised up to 600 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min and held for 1 h to allow complete carbonization of the rattan powder. Next, the temperatures were, respectively, raised to 1100 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min and 1300 °C at a rate 4 °C/min. Finally, the reactants were heated at a rate of 2°C/min to the desired temperature (1500 °C) and held for 2 h at this temperature to promote full reaction between the C source and the Si source. Subsequently, the furnace was cooled down to room temperature at a programmed cooling rate. The prepared two R-SiC ceramic samples derived from the rattan/silicon material and rattan/silica material were, respectively, recorded as R-SiCSi and R-SiCSiO2, where the subscripts represent the Si source.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of rattan-based SiC (R-SiC) ceramics preparation process


Mass changes in the samples during the transformation of rattan/silica source material into SiC ceramic were measured using an analytical balance (sensitivity 0.0001 g, Mettler-Toledo PL303-IC, Switzerland). These values were then used in mass residue calculations. The phase composition and crystallographic structure of SiC samples were determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker AV300, Holland), using a nickel filtered Cu Kα radiation over the 2θ range of 5–90° at a scanning speed of 4°/min. Meanwhile, the elemental analysis of SiC samples was conducted on the X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Shimadzu1800, Japan). The chemical bonds and functional groups of the SiC samples were investigated using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Nexus670, America) at ambient conditions. The morphology and microstructure of SiC samples were examined under an environmental scanning electron microscope (FESEM, FEI XL-30, America). Meanwhile, an energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX, FEG132-10, America) equipped with FESEM was carried out to determinate the element composition of the SiC samples corresponding to the SEM images. The specific surface area (SSA) of SiC samples was obtained by N2 physisorption instrument (ASAP2020, America).

Results and discussion

Mass change

The sample masses before and after the one-step pyrolysis were measured. Mass residue was calculated from these mass measurements. This experiment was repeated three times using identical processes and conditions to reduce random error. Figure 2 shows the mass residue of R-SiCSi and R-SiCSiO2 after one-step pyrolysis. The average mass residue of the two SiC samples is almost the same (42.56 wt% of R-SiCSi and 42.45 wt% of R-SiCSiO2), indicating the near-equal mass loss ratio. During the formation of the carbon template, the plant biomass exhibited evident mass loss due to the carbonization, as described in [7, 14, 34]. The rattan content of the rattan/silicon material and rattan/silica material are 74.00 and 57.18 wt%, respectively. In the identical pyrolysis condition, the rattan/silicon material has higher carbonization loss than rattan/silica material during the carbonization of the rattan powder. As a consequence, the carbothermal reduction of SiO2 occurs in the preparation of R-SiCSiO2 to compensate for the whole mass loss of rattan/silica material and results in the near-equal mass loss ratio of R-SiCSi to R-SiCSiO2, suggesting the formation of SiC in R-SiCSiO2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mass residue of a R-SiCSiO2 and b R-SiCSi. R-SiC represents the rattan-base SiC, and the subscripts represent the Si source

XRD analysis

XRD technique was used to investigate the phase evolution during the formation process of SiC. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi after one-step pyrolysis. It can be seen from the two patterns (Fig. 3) that several sharp peaks attributed to SiC are positioned around 2θ = 35.8°, 41.5°, 60.1°, and 71.9°. These peaks are associated with diffraction from the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of β-SiC (JCPDS Card No. 29-1129), respectively. In addition, an unconspicuous peak (at 2θ = 33.9°) near by the (111) plane of SiC is observed, which is characteristic of the planar defects (stacking faults and rotational twins) of (111) plane in the β-SiC structure [35, 36]. From Fig. 3, it is obvious that the two patterns have no broad peak in the whole range of 10–80°, which indicates the absence of an amorphous phase in R-SiCSi and R-SiCSiO2. Apart from the peaks of β-SiC, well-defined crystalline sharp peaks of cristobalite (JCPDS Card No. 39-1425) can also be found in the pattern of the SiC samples, which suggests the existence of crystalline SiO2 in R-SiCSi and R-SiCSiO2. From the above results, it can be assumed that reaction temperature (1500 °C) was sufficiently high for the formation of crystalline SiC structures, but SiO2 was not completely consumed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of a R-SiCSiO2 and b R-SiCSi. R-SiC represents the rattan-base SiC, and the subscripts represent the Si source

The two XRD patterns show obvious differences between R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi at the range of 20–33° (Fig. 3). The pattern (a) of R-SiCSiO2 has three peaks of cristobalite (crystalline SiO2) located at 2θ = 22.0°, 28.5°, and 31.5° corresponding to the (101), (111), and (102) planes, while the pattern (b) of R-SiCSi only has a small weak peak of cristobalite positioned around 2θ = 22.0° corresponding to the (101) plane. The difference of cristobalite in Fig. 3 indicates a small amount of SiO2 in R-SiCSi. The existence of cristobalite in R-SiCSi can be attributed to SiO2 reserved from the rattan after one-step pyrolysis [8, 27]. The high-intensity peak (2θ = 22.0°) and two small peaks of cristobalite in pattern (a) suggest that R-SiCSiO2 contains SiO2 in large quantities. SiO2 existing in R-SiCSiO2 originated mainly from the SiO2 sol besides the rattan. Some of them were not completely consumed by the carbothermal reduction reaction between C and SiO2. Furthermore, SiO2 sol is found to have a higher intake of SiO2 in the rattan powder than in previously reported for studies of bulk rattan [11, 36]. The higher intake of silica indicates that R-SiC may be prepared at a higher yield. In additionally, XRF technique was used to determine relative content of the concerned elements of R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi. Table 1 shows the effect of different Si source on the relative content of SiC, residual C, and SiO2 or Si, which supports the XRD analysis.

Table 1 Relative content of phase composition in R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi

FT-IR analysis

The chemical bonds and functional groups of the prepared SiC samples were displayed on the FT-IR spectra, as shown in Fig. 4. It can be observed that the spectra of R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi are extremely similar, implying the similar chemical bonds in the two SiC samples. It can be found from Fig. 4 that the peak ascribed to anti-symmetric Si–C stretching vibration is located at 781 cm−1. This indicates that SiC has been formed [37, 38]. In addition, the extremely weak peak at 1630 cm−1, characteristic of the vibration of C–C stretching, was observed as well. The weak peak indicates the trace residue of carbon derived from rattan, while the disappearance of amorphous structures in XRD patterns indicates the existence of carbon in less and lower graphitization after a higher high-temperature pyrolysis [39]. The two strong peaks at 1090 and 474 cm−1, which are assigned to Si–O–Si stretching and anti-stretching vibrations, were also found in spectra (a) and (b), as shown in Fig. 4, suggesting the existence of SiO2 in R-SiCSi and R-SiCSiO2. On peak shape and transmittance, the relative transmittance ratios of SiO2/SiC peak of the two SiC samples are almost equal (1.7 of R-SiCSi and 1.5 of R-SiCSiO2). In combination with the content of SiO2 in SiC samples from the XRD analysis results, it can simultaneously demonstrate that R-SiCSi contains SiC in less quantity, while R-SiCSiO2 contains SiC in larger quantity. In other words, SiO2 sol has a higher yield of SiC than Si powder for the preparation of R-SiC ceramics.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra of a R-SiCSiO2 and b R-SiCSi. R-SiC represents the rattan-base SiC, and the subscripts represent the Si source

SEM and EDAX analysis

As shown in Fig. 5, the morphology and element composition of R-SiCSi can be obtained via SEM and EDAX technique. Figure 5a shows the common appearance in R-SiCSi, displaying two entirely different morphology structures: strips and particles. The corresponding high-magnification SEM images of the strips and particles are, respectively, shown in Fig. 5b and c. It can be observed from Fig. 5b that the morphology consists of micron-sized bulk particles and small particles. The small particles not only attach on the surface of bulk particles, but also stack on each other to form large particles of different sizes. The major element composition of the particles is Si, C, P, and O, as shown in Fig. 5d, indicating that the particles composed of SiC and Si incorporation with the much weaker signal intensity of C than Si (Si/C intensity ratio ≈9.4). It can be concluded that the particles of R-SiCSi contain a small quantity of SiC and abundant residual Si. Figure 5c exhibits a corresponding high-magnification microstructure of the strips morphology, where many round holes with diameters of several micrometers are arranged in columns on the surface. The round holes on the surface of the strips are similar to anatomical structure of rattan and are likely to have originated from the pits on the plant’s cell wall or perforations of the vessels [17]. The EDAX spectrum (Fig. 5e) reveals that the major element composition of strips is C, Si, P, and O. The element type of strips is the same as the particles, but the signal intensity of C is much stronger than Si (Si/C intensity ratio ≈0.4), indicating that the main composition of strips is SiC and C. The existence of C makes it clear that the liquid melt-Si did not completely infiltrated the rattan powder during the pyrolysis process, resulting in the incomplete silicification of the rattan charcoal and the preservation of the porous morphology [36]. In summary, R-SiCSi mainly consists of SiC, unreacted C, and excess Si, which is similar to those of previous studies [10, 25, 27, 34, 40].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of R-SiCSi (a) and the corresponding high-magnification SEM image (b, c) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) spectrum (d, e). R-SiC represents the rattan-base SiC, and the subscripts represent the Si source

SEM images and EDAX spectrums of R-SiCSiO2 after one-step pyrolysis are shown in Fig. 6. Compared to the SEM images of R-SiCSi (Fig. 5), it is worthy of note that several significant changes were observed in the general morphology of R-SiCSiO2. Figure 6a only shows a single fragmentary morphology of R-SiCSiO2 from a low-magnification SEM image, which is obviously different from Fig. 5a. In general, several morphologies can be found in R-SiCSiO2 from the corresponding high-magnification SEM images (Fig. 6b–e). One of the morphologies is broken tubular structures in the axial direction of rattan stem. The structures are SiC according to the EDAX spectrum (Si/C intensity ratio ≈1.2), as shown in Fig. 6f, indicating that the tubular structures of rattan were damaged during the formation of SiC. Some flake structures can also be seen in Fig. 6c, displaying several columns of oval holes on their surface. The flake structures are similar to Fig. 5c of R-SiCSi and it can be assumed that the precursor of the flake structures is perforated plates contained specifically in the vessel. The corresponding EDAX spectrum of the flake structures (Fig. 6g), in which the Si/C intensity ratio is about 0.6, indicates that the flake structures are composed of SiC and unreacted C. Comparing Fig. 6c, g of R-SiCSiO2 with Fig. 5c, e of R-SiCSi, R-SiCSiO2 in Fig. 6c preserved the pore structure of rattan better than Fig. 5c, and the corresponding Si/C intensity ratio of Fig. 6g is larger than in Fig. 5e, which reveals that the amount of residual SiO2 in pore structure of R-SiCSiO2 is larger than residual Si in R-SiCSi. In addition, Fig. 6d displays a complete porous structure, which is extremely similar to the natural microstructure of rattan. It can be found from Fig. 6h that the pore structure contains C, Si, P, and O elements and has a lower Si/C intensity ratio (0.4), suggesting the generation of SiC and the existence of more unreacted C. As a result of the above three morphologies, it can be concluded that rattan powder is impregnated by SiO2 sol better than high-temperature liquid melt-Si.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of R-SiCSiO2 (a) and the corresponding high-magnification SEM image (be) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) spectrum (fi). R-SiC represents the rattan-base SiC, and the subscripts represent the Si source

It was reported that the most obvious and significant aim of SiC ceramics prepared from the natural plant biomass was to mimic the biological cellular morphology in a ceramic microstructure [9, 41, 42]. From the above analysis of the SEM and EDAX results, it can be concluded that R-SiCSiO2 can retain the natural and graceful pore structure of rattan, but most of R-SiCSi was embedded by unreacted Si, resulting in the rare appearance of pore structures derived from rattan powder. This finding is explained by the fact that the SiO2 sol was able to infiltrate deeper into the rattan powder and had closer contact with cell wall of rattan at ambient temperature, while the liquid melt-Si failed to completely infiltrate into the rattan powder, which leaded to the incomplete reaction between Si and C. In this way, little SiC was synthesized and lots of unreacted Si and C were left over in R-SiCSi, where Si was left on the surface of R-SiCSi, and C was left inside R-SiCSi, resulting in the coverage of the pore structure. Moreover, the unreacted C had a great influence on the porous structures of R-SiCSiO2, with the porous structures becoming more and more complete with the increase of unreacted C [36, 43]. Due to the high thermal resistance of SiC, these porous R-SiCSiO2 can be applied in hot gas filters in industrial and automobile exhausts, catalyst supports, and porous burners at high temperature [4, 22]. Figure 6e shows a high-magnification SEM image inside the broken tubular structures, indicating two particular morphology structures with the size of several micrometers, i.e., tablet-like e and rod-like structures. The EDAX spectrum (Fig. 6i) of these two particular morphology suggests that they are SiC according to the Si/C intensity ratio ≈1.4, which are, respectively, called SiC particles or whiskers in other studies [8]. The particle and whisker may be resulted from the reaction of SiO vapor and CO, which are derived from \( {\text {C}_{\text {(s)}}} + {\text {SiO}_{\text {2(s)}}} \to {\text {CO}_{\text {(g)}}} + {\text {SiO}_\text {(g)}} \).

In addition, the P and O elements also can be observed from EDAX spectrums of the final R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi, as shown in Figs. 5 and 6. It can be assumed that P element is derived from rattan powder and plays a catalytic role in the formation of SiC, which is consistent with other studies [36]. The O element only comes from SiO2 after pyrolysis, suggesting the existence of SiO2 in R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi. The results agree well with the XRD and FT-IR analysis.

Specific surface area analysis

The specific surface area of R-SiCSiO2, R-SiCSi, and rattan powder is shown in Table 2. It shows that the formation of SiC can result in a decrease in specific surface area of rattan powder, and the same results occur in other papers [11, 14, 27]. During the transformation from rattan to R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi, the specific surface area decreases from 22.15 to 21.99 and 6.25 m2/g, respectively. Furthermore, R-SiCSiO2 possesses a much higher specific surface area than R-SiCSi, mainly due to the coverage of residual Si in R-SiCSi. The results agree well with the above SEM and EDAX analysis.

Table 2 Specific surface area of the rattan and rattan-base SiC (R-SiC) ceramics

On the basis of the above results and discussions, a schematic diagram for the formation mechanism of R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi is shown in Fig. 7. The SiO2 sol is able to infiltrate deeper into the rattan powder through the pore structure at ambient temperature, thus coming into close contact with cell wall before the formation of SiC. Conversely, Si remains mostly on the surface of the rattan powder, with little of Si coming into contact with the cell wall. With the continuous increase of temperature, the rattan powder was carbonized, infiltrated by liquid melt-Si spontaneously, and reacted with Si and SiO2 during the formation of SiC. After the formation of SiC, R-SiCSiO2 possessed a porous structure and higher yield of SiC, while most of R-SiCSi was embedded by unreacted Si, resulting in the rare appearance of pore structures and a lower yield of SiC. Therefore, the SiO2 sol is more suitable for preparing high-yielding porous R-SiC ceramic.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic diagram illustrating the formation mechanism of SiC from Si powder and SiO2 sol


R-SiC ceramics, R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi, were successfully synthesized using Si powder and SiO2 sol, respectively. The Si source used had significant effects on compositions and morphologies of final R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi. The two SiC samples both consist of SiC, SiO2, and unreacted C, but R-SiCSi contains a large amount of unreacted Si. SiO2 sol has higher impregnation in the rattan powder than Si, but neither of them can completely react with the rattan powder (carbon). Furthermore, the SiO2 sol has a higher yield of SiC than Si powder during the preparation of R-SiC ceramics. In addition to this, the porous morphology of rattan can remain intact in R-SiCSiO2, while it is difficult to find in R-SiCSi, resulting in a higher specific surface area of R-SiCSiO2. The reasons for these differences are mainly due to SiO2 sol forming closer contact with the rattan cell wall than Si powder before the respective formation of R-SiCSiO2 and R-SiCSi. The rod-like SiC whisker and tablet-like SiC particle can also be found in the pores of R-SiCSiO2. The biomorphic porous R-SiCSiO2 can be used as filters, catalyst supports, and porous burners at high temperature.


  1. Fan J, Chu PK (2014) Silicon carbide nanostructures: fabrication, structure, and properties. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu B, Balani K (2011) Advanced structural ceramics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Riley F (2009) Structural ceramics: fundamentals and case studies. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saddow SE, Agarwal A (2004) Advances in silicon carbide processing and applications. Artech House, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miyafuji H, Saka S (2001) Na2O-SiO2 wood-inorganic composites prepared by the sol-gel process and their fire-resistant properties. J Wood Sci 47:483–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arellano-López AR, Martínez-Fernández J, Gonzalez P, Domínguez C, Fernández-Quero V, Singh M (2004) Biomorphic SiC: a new engineering ceramic material. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 1:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sieber H, Hoffmann C, Kaindl A, Greil P (2000) Biomorphic cellular ceramics. Adv Eng Mater 2:105–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiew YL, Cheong KY (2011) A review on the synthesis of SiC from plant-based biomasses. Mater Sci Eng B 176:951–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maity A, Das H, Kalita D, Kayal N, Goswami T, Chakrabarti O (2014) Studies on formation and siliconization of carbon template of coir fibreboard precursor to SiC ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 34:3499–3511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishimaru K, Hata T, Bronsveld P, Nishizawa T, Imamura Y (2007) Characterization of sp2-and sp3-bonded carbon in wood charcoal. J Wood Sci 53:442–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zampieri A, Sieber H, Selvam T, Mabande GT, Schwieger W, Scheffler F, Scheffler M, Greil P (2005) Biomorphic cellular SiSiC/zeolite ceramic composites: from rattan palm to bioinspired structured monoliths for catalysis and sorption. Adv Mater 17:344–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manocha SM, Patel H, Manocha LM (2013) Effect of steam activation on development of light weight biomorphic porous SiC from pine wood precursor. J Mater Eng Perform 22:396–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin DW, Park SS, Choa YH, Niihara K (1999) Silicon/silicon carbide composites fabricated by infiltration of a silicon melt into charcoal. J Am Ceram Soc 82:3251–3253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordic M, Bucevac D, Ruzic J, Gavrilovic S, Hercigonja R, Stankovic M, Matovic B (2014) Biomimetic synthesis and properties of cellular SiC. Ceram Int 40:3699–3705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Egelja A, Gulicovski J, Devečerski A, Ninić M, Radosavljević-Mihajlović A, Matović B (2008) Preparation of biomorphic SiC ceramics. Sci Sinter 40:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan Z, Liu J, Zhang J, Ma T, Li Z (2011) Biomorphic silicon/silicon carbide ceramics from birch powder. Ceram Int 37:725–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogli E, Sieber H, Greil P (2002) Biomorphic SiC-ceramic prepared by Si-vapor phaseinfiltration of wood. J Eur Ceram Soc 22:2663–2668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vyshnyakova K, Yushin G, Pereselentseva L, Gogotsi Y (2006) Formation of porous SiC ceramics by pyrolysis of wood impregnated with silica. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 3:485–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Locs J, Berzina-Cimdina L, Zhurinsh A, Loca D (2009) Optimized vacuum/pressure sol impregnation processing of wood for the synthesis of porous, biomorphic SiC ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:1513–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartuli C, Bemporad E, Tulliani JM, Tirillò J, Pulci G, Sebastiani M (2009) Mechanical properties of cellular ceramics obtained by gel casting: characterization and modeling. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:2979–2989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose M, Korenblit Y, Kockrick E, Borchardt L, Oschatz M, Kaskel S, Yushin G (2011) Hierarchical micro-and mesoporous carbide-derived carbon as a high-performance electrode material in supercapacitors. Small 7:1108–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oschatz M, Kockrick E, Rose M, Borchardt L, Klein N, Senkovska I, Freudenberg T, Korenblit Y, Yushin G, Kaskel S (2010) A cubic ordered, mesoporous carbide-derived carbon for gas and energy storage applications. Carbon 48:3987–3992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang ZH (2002) World bamboo and rattan. Liaoning Science & Technique Press, Shenyang

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ebanyenle E, Oteng-Amoako AA (2005) Variation in some anatomical and physical properties of stems of five rattan palm species of Ghana. J Bamboo Rattan 4:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin YJ, Lo XW (2011) Fabrication of SiC and SiC/aluminum-silicon composites from Rattan charcoal. Key Eng Mater 479:119–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rachchh NV, Ujeniya PS, Misra RK (2014) Mechanical characterisation of rattan fibre polyester composite. Procedia Mater Sci 6:1396–1404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zampieri A, Kullmann S, Selvam T, Bauer J, Schwieger W, Sieber H, Fey T, Greil P (2006) Bioinspired rattan-derived SiSiC/Zeolite monoliths: preparation and characterization. Micropor Mesopor Mat 90:162–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maisarah T, Ahmad Z, Roszalia A, Luqman MA (2015) Characterization of rattan waste for binderless particleboard (BPB) sampleion. Adv Mater Res 1115:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hameed BH, Ahmad AL, Latiff KNA (2007) Adsorption of basic dye (methylene blue) onto activated carbon prepared from rattan sawdust. Dyes Pigm 75:143–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vix-Guterl C, Ehrburger P (1997) Effect of the properties of a carbon substrate on its reaction with silica for silicon carbide formation. Carbon 35:1587–1592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Preiss H, Berger LM, Braun M (1995) Formation of black glasses and silicon carbide from binary carbonaceous/silica hydrogels. Carbon 33:1739–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, Luo R (2011) An environmentally friendly route to prepare hierarchical carbon/carbon–SiC composites by carbothermal reduction. Carbon 49(1):339–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. DIN EN 725-9-2006 (2006) Advanced technical ceramics–methods of test for ceramic powders–Part 9: determination of untapped bulk density. European Committee for Standardization, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maity A, Kalita D, Kayal TK, Goswami T, Chakrabarti O, Maiti HS, Rao PG (2010) Synthesis of SiC ceramics from processed cellulosic bio-precursor. Ceram Int 36:323–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shin Y, Wang C, Samuels WD, Exarhos GJ (2007) Synthesis of SiC nanorods from bleached wood pulp. Mater Lett 61:2814–2817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pan J, Pan J, Cheng X, Yan X, Lu Q, Zhang C (2014) Synthesis of hierarchical porous silicon oxycarbide ceramics from preceramic polymer and wood biomass composites. J Eur Ceram Soc 34:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xingzhong G, Lingjie Z, Liqing Y, Hui Y, Lin Z (2010) Preparation of silicon carbide using bamboo charcoal as carbon source. Mater Lett 64:331–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sujirote K, Leangsuwan P (2003) Silicon carbide formation from pretreated rice husks. J Mater Sci 38:4739–4744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Segatelli MG, Pires ATN, Yoshida IVP (2014) Synthesis and structural characterization of carbon-rich SiCxOy derived from a Ni-containing hybrid polymer. J Eur Ceram Soc 28:2247–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mallick D, Chakrabarti OP, Maiti HS, Majumdar R (2007) Si/SiC ceramics from wood of Indian dicotyledonous mango tree. Ceram Int 33:1217–1222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chakrabarti OP, Maiti HS, Majumdar R (2004) Si-SiC ceramics from plant precursor. J Mater Sci 39:4715–4717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Martĺnez-Fernández J, Valera-Feria FM, Singh M (2000) High temperature compressive mechanical behavior of biomorphic silicon carbide ceramics. Scr Mater 43:813–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cordelair J, Greil P (2000) Electrical conductivity measurements as a microprobe for structure transitions in polysiloxane derived Si–O–C ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 20:1947–1957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The National Science-technology Support Plan Project (2012BAD54G0103) funded this research. The authors also wish to thank Prof. Yue Zhang from Beihang University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, for his help in guiding experimental work, and thank Mr. Oliver Frith from the International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) for his revision of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xing’e Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, H., Zheng, Y., Ma, J. et al. Effect of different silicon sources on rattan-based silicon carbide ceramic prepared by one-step pyrolysis. J Wood Sci 63, 95–103 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: