Skip to main content

Advertisement

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Journal of Wood Science Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Gas-phase pyrolysis of methyl glucosides and levoglucosan

Abstract

Levoglucosan, the major intermediate in cellulose pyrolysis, is stable up to around 500 °C in the gas phase. To study whether this stability is a characteristic property of levoglucosan, the gas-phase reactivity was compared with those of methyl α- and β-glucosides at 200–500 °C (residence time 1.2–2.0 s). The methyl glucosides decomposed even at 200 and 300 °C to form levoglucosan exclusively. This selective transglycosylation was explained with a concerted mechanism. Fragmentation of the glucosides forming C1–C3 carbonyl compounds started at 400 °C, a temperature lower than that of levoglucosan (500 °C). Thus, levoglucosan is a special carbohydrate that is stable in the gas phase, and the stability is explained by the steric hindrance of the bicyclic ring. Formation of the anhydrofuranose isomer and furans was negligible from the gas-phase pyrolysis of these compounds, suggesting that these are produced mainly from the molten-phase pyrolysis. These results show the roles of gas- and molten-phase reactions during carbohydrate pyrolysis, providing insights for upgrading biomass pyrolysis/gasification processes.

Introduction

Pyrolysis is the underlying principle of various thermochemical conversion technologies such as carbonization, fast pyrolysis, and gasification for producing biofuels, biochemicals, and biomaterials from biomass resources. Lignocellulosic biomass is the most promising bioresource, because there is a significant amount on the earth. Understanding the chemistry involved in the lignocellulose pyrolysis provides insights into the upgrading of these conversion processes.

Cellulose, which represents 40–50 wt% of the chemical components of lignocellulose, is a crystalline polysaccharide that decomposes drastically around 350 °C, and a large amount of levoglucosan (1,6-anhydro-β-d-glucopyranose; LG) is produced [1, 2]. Kwon et al. [2] reported approximately 70 wt% of LG from the pyrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose under vacuum pyrolysis conditions. Thus, the pyrolysis behavior of LG has been studied extensively in both molten [37] and gas [3, 4, 810] phases to understand the roles of intermediates during pyrolysis and gasification of cellulosic biomass.

The pyrolytic reactivity of LG is different in the molten and gas phases [3, 9]. As indicated in the early report of Pictet [11] in 1918, the molten LG polymerizes into polysaccharides through transglycosylation reactions at >240 °C, which is a temperature much lower than its formation temperature (around 350 °C) from cellulose. Alternatively, LG in the gas phase is stable and starts to decompose at higher temperatures >500 °C (residence time 0.8–1.4 s), where fragmentation reactions selectively proceed to form C1–C3 aldehydes/ketones and noncondensable gases without forming any coke [9]. Any aromatic compounds such as benzenes and furans [furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF)] are not produced in the gas phase, which is explained later by the homolysis-based fragmentation occurring at high temperatures prior to the formation of benzenes and furans [12]. Because of these different reactivities in the molten and gas phases, extensive coking occurs only by cooling the gaseous LG produced from cellulose pyrolysis into the molten state [13].

LG and other sugar derivatives are stabilized in aprotic hydrogen-bond-acceptor solvents such as aromatic substances [14, 15] and polyethers [16, 17]. From these observations, hydrogen-bond theory was proposed, in which intermolecular hydrogen bonds act as acid and base catalysts that promote pyrolytic reactions including transglycosylation in the molten phase [1517]. The stability of LG in the gas phase can be explained with this theory, because intermolecular hydrogen bonding is normally less important in the gas phase. However, there have been no reports to clarify whether this stability is characteristic feature of LG.

Transglycosylation forming LG and polysaccharides is the most important reaction of carbohydrates in molten-phase pyrolysis [11, 1820]. Concerted transglycosylation mechanisms have been proposed by the theoretical calculations for the gas-phase pyrolysis of methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe) [21] and other carbohydrates [2224]. Hosoya et al. [21] proposed a concerted mechanism for the gas-phase conversion of GlcβOMe into LG, in which the ΔG 0‡ value is reduced to 47.7 kcal mol−1. However, these reports are only based on theoretical calculations, because of the difficulty in studying only gas-phase pyrolysis of carbohydrates. Hence, the concerted transglycosylation mechanisms have not been confirmed by experimental study.

In this study, GlcβOMe, methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe), and LG were pyrolyzed only in the gas phase at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C under a N2 flow (residence times ranging from 1.2 to 2.0 s) to understand the reactivities of these compounds and check the adaptability of the proposed concerted mechanisms.

Experimental

Materials

GlcαOMe, GlcβOMe (hydrated), and LG were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Carbosynth Limited (Compton, Berkshire, UK), respectively. Water trapped in the GlcβOMe crystals was eliminated before use by drying in an oven at 105 °C for 1 h, which were stored in a desiccator before use. Other chemicals were used as received without further purification.

Two-stage tubular reactor

A two-stage tubular reactor (Fig. 1), which is fully described in our previous paper [9] dealing with the gas-phase pyrolysis of LG, was used and composed of two cylindrical electric furnaces (internal diameter 35 mm, length 160 mm; Asahi Rika Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Chiba, Japan), serving as the evaporator and pyrolyzer. Each furnace included a quartz glass tube (internal diameter 15 mm, wall thickness 1.5 mm) and these tubes were connected. One end of the evaporator was attached to a nitrogen cylinder via a mass flow controller (SEC-400MK3, Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and the other end, coming from the pyrolyzer, was connected to a gas wash bottle via a glass wool filter. A dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d 6 solution (2.0 mL) containing an oximation reagent (NH2OHHCl) (20 mg) was placed in the gas wash bottle to recover the volatile products.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow-type two-stage tubular reactor consisting of an evaporator connected to a pyrolyzer and product recovery units

Pyrolysis

The procedure reported in our previous paper [9] was used by modifying the pyrolysis temperature and heating rate in the evaporator. A solution of GlcαOMe, GlcβOMe, or LG (5 mg) in methanol (0.1 mL) was applied to the area separated by the fringes in the evaporator tube, and the methanol was evaporated under a nitrogen flow. After the complete drying in a desiccator under vacuum, the evaporator tube was connected to the pyrolyzer tube and other components of the experimental setup, and a nitrogen flow (400 mL min−1) was supplied for 30 min prior to conducting each pyrolysis trial to remove the air inside the reactor. The pyrolyzer was heated at the desired temperature in the range of 200–500 °C, and then, the evaporator temperature was raised to 120 °C over 12 min and subsequently to 190 °C at a heating rate of 5.8 °C min−1. The GlcαOMe, GlcβOMe, and LG crystals were melt at this temperature and evaporated slowly to the volatile materials that were transported to the pyrolyzer with the flowing nitrogen. The evaporator temperature (190 °C) was carefully chosen to inhibit the occurrence of the molten-phase reactions. After holding the evaporator at 190 °C for 13 min to complete the evaporation, heating was stopped, and the tube reactor was cooled by opening the furnace covers and subsequently applying an air flow from the outside.

By this procedure, both glucosides were evaporated prior to molten-phase pyrolysis reactions and pushed into the pyrolysis zone, where pyrolysis reactions took place. The unreacted glucosides were recovered completely on the reactor wall outlet from the pyrolyzer and in the gas wash bottle. The residence time of the pyrolyzer was defined as the period over which the gaseous substances were present in the region of the pyrolyzer with temperatures within the set value ±25 °C. The residence times at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C were estimated as 2.0, 1.6, 1.4, and 1.2 s, respectively.

The experiments were performed at least twice for each pyrolysis condition to confirm the reproducibility.

Characterization of the pyrolysis mixture

The condensates on the reactor tube interior wall and in the line between the reactor and the gas wash bottle were removed by rinsing with the solution in the gas wash bottle (2.0 mL of DMSO-d 6 ). The solution was analyzed directly by 1H NMR spectroscopy using AC-400 (400 MHz) spectrometer (Bruker Biospin K.K., Yokohama, Japan) following the addition of 2-furoic acid as an internal standard. Quantifications of methyl glucosides, LG, and other compounds, some of which with carbonyl groups were observed as the oxime derivatives (cis/trans), were performed using the peak areas of the NMR signals compared with those of the internal standard, as described in our previous paper [9].

Computational methods

The calculations were conducted using the Gaussian 09 software package [25]. The geometry optimizations for nonradical reactants, products, and transition states (TSs) were performed by employing the density functional theory method (M06-2X) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets. For radical products, UM06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) was employed. Vibrational frequency calculations used the same methods and basis sets. The energies of optimized geometries were calculated with the same functional and 6-311+(d,p) basis set. The activation energy values and bond dissociation energies were estimated as the relative energies between the reactants and the TSs or radicals. All the energies were calculated after zero-point energy correction. Frequency analysis showed one imaginary mode for the TS and no imaginary modes for the reactants, products, and precomplexes. In addition, we performed intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations to ascertain that the TS connected the reactant and product.

Results and discussion

Pyrolytic reactivity

Figure 2 shows the recoveries of methyl glucosides and LG after pyrolysis. The gaseous LG was stable in the temperature range of 200–400 °C, whereas the methyl glucosides decomposed even at the lowest temperature of 200 °C, although the conversion rates were not large. Thus, LG is clearly more stable than methyl glucosides in the gas phase.

Fig. 2
figure2

Recoveries of methyl α-glucoside, methyl β-glucoside, and levoglucosan after the pyrolysis at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C in the gas phase (residence time 1.2–2.0 s, N2 flow 400 mL min−1)

As indicated by the 1H-NMR spectra (300 °C, Fig. 3) of the DMSO-d 6-soluble portions obtained from the pyrolysis of methyl glucosides, the major product obtained at 200 and 300 °C was LG. The yields from GlcαOMe and GlcβOMe were only in the range of 3.7–14.0% (C-based), but these yields corresponded to 96.3 and 91.1% (200 °C) and 93.8 and 86.0% (300 °C), respectively, for the amounts of reacted glucosides. Thus, transglycosylation reactions proceeded in a low temperature range, and LG is formed selectively from the gaseous methyl glucosides. The molten GlcβOMe were completely recovered at 200 °C even after the 30 min heating under nitrogen [17], the present results of the gas-phase investigations clearly demonstrated that the transglycosylation reactivities of methyl glucosides are rather enhanced in the gas phase. This is an opposite trend to that observed for LG, which is stabilized in the gas phase.

Fig. 3
figure3

1H-NMR spectra of the DMSO-d 6-soluble portions obtained from the pyrolysis of gaseous methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe) and methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe) at 300 °C with a residence time of 1.6 s under a N2 flow of 400 mL min−1. Filled squares levoglucosan (LG); open circles GlcαOMe; filled circles, GlcβOMe; asterisks internal standard (2-furoic acid)

1,6-Anhydro-β-d-glucofuranose (AGF), the furanose isomer of LG, forms along with LG from the pyrolysis of cellulose and other glucose-based carbohydrates [2629]. Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH-101) gave a mixture of LG/AGF at the molar ratio of 89/11 by heating up to 500 °C (heating rate 70 °C min−1) under a N2 flow at 400 mL min−1. However, the AGF yields from the gaseous methyl glucosides were at negligible levels, as suggested by the enlarged spectra (300 °C) in Fig. 3, where the LG/AGF molar ratios were calculated to be 96/4 (GlcαOMe) and 97/3 (GlcαOMe) from the comparison of the peak areas. These results indicate that the AGF formation proceeds mainly from the molten (liquid)-phase pyrolysis of glycosides.

By increasing the pyrolysis temperature to 400 °C, fragmentation products started to be produced from the gaseous methyl glucosides. As assigned in the NMR spectrum of GlcαOMe at 500 °C (Fig. 4), acetic acid, formic acid, and oxime derivatives (cis/trans isomers) of aldehydes were identified in the pyrolysis mixture along with LG. Only C1–C3 aldehydes were produced: C3 [methylglyoxal (MeGO)], C2 [glycolaldehyde (GA), glyoxal (GO), and acetaldehyde], and C1 [formaldehyde (FA)].

Fig. 4
figure4

1H-NMR spectrum of the DMSO-d 6-soluble portion obtained from the pyrolysis of gaseous methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe) at 500 °C with a residence time of 1.2 s under a N2 flow of 400 mL min−1. Filled squares levoglucosan (LG); open circles GlcαOMe; asterisks internal standard (2-furoic acid); acetaldehyde (AA); acetic acid (AcOH); formaldehyde (Fald); formic acid (FcOH); glycolaldehyde (GA); glyoxal (GO); methylglyoxal (MeGO)

In Fig. 5, the yields of the fragmentation products are plotted against the pyrolysis temperature and compared between methyl glucosides and LG. Fragmentation reactions of LG started at 500 °C, which is higher than the onset temperature (400 °C) of methyl glucosides. Thus, LG is also more stable against fragmentation, and the methyl glucosides directly gave fragmentation products, not via LG, at 400 °C. The major fragmentation products from methyl glucosides were MeGO, FA, GA, and GO. Noncondensable gases are also expected to form along with the condensable products by the fragmentation reactions, but any attempts to analyze the gaseous products with micro gas chromatography failed because of the low concentration by dilution with nitrogen.

Fig. 5
figure5

Yields of fragmentation products from methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe), methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe), and levoglucosan (LG) after the pyrolysis at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C in the gas phase (residence times: 1.2–2.0 s, N2 flow 400 mL min−1). Filled circles methylglyoxal; filled triangles formaldehyde; filled squares glycolaldehyde; open circles glyoxal; open triangles acetaldehyde; open squares formic acid

Figure 6 summarizes the yields of LG (except for the case of LG pyrolysis), fragmentation products, and gas/unidentified products for each pyrolysis temperature. Methanol formed from the pyrolysis of methyl glucosides is included in gas/unidentified, because this is not the product from the fragmentation of the glucose-units of methyl glucosides. The greater stability of LG against the reactions forming these products is shown in this figure. Some different features depending on the anomer type of methyl glucosides were also identified. Transglycosylation reactivity forming LG at low pyrolysis temperatures (200–400 °C) was greater in the β-anomer, whereas the fragmentation reactivity that was greater at higher temperatures (400–500 °C) was in the opposite order (GlcαOMe > GlcβOMe). These results are consistent with the temperature dependency shown in Fig. 2, where the reactivity order for GlcαOMe and GlcβOMe is reversed in the temperature range of 300–400 °C. The greater fragmentation reactivity of GlcαOMe can be explained with the postulated radical-chain mechanisms as discussed below.

Fig. 6
figure6

Yields of levoglucosan (LG; except for the case of LG pyrolysis), fragmentation products, and gas/unidentified products from methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe), methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe), and LG after the pyrolysis at 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C in the gas phase (residence times 1.2–2.0 s, N2 flow 400 mL min−1). White bars gas/unidentified products; light shaded bars fragmentation products; dark shaded bars LG

Gas-phase reaction mechanism

Transglycosylation

Methyl glucosides produced LG at a low pyrolysis temperature of 200 °C in the gas phase. These observations can be explained with the concerted heterolysis mechanisms as proposed by Hosoya et al. [21] for the conversion from GlcβOMe to LG (Fig. 7). In the unimolecular mechanism, conformational change from C1 to 1C is followed by the coordination of C6–OH to C1 (glycosidic)–O, to form a four-membered cyclic TS, which makes the intramolecular nucleophilic substitution at C1 easier (ΔG 0‡ 47.7 kcal mol−1). They also indicated the possibility of a bimolecular mechanism, in which the association of C6–OH and C1O with C6OH of another molecule forms a more stable six-membered cyclic TS. The bimolecular mechanism reduces the ΔG 0‡ further to 36.4 kcal mol−1.

Fig. 7
figure7

Uni- and bimolecular concerted mechanisms proposed by Hosoya et al. for the conversion from methyl β-glucoside to levoglucosan

No reasonable unimolecular concerted mechanisms could be proposed for GlcαOMe because of the anomeric effect. Accordingly, selective LG formation from GlcαOMe at such low pyrolysis temperatures could not be explained without considering the bimolecular concerted mechanisms. Although further systematic studies are necessary to conclude the involvement of the bimolecular mechanisms, bimolecular keto-enol tautomerization was proposed for the gas-phase pyrolysis of 1,3-dihydroxyacetone at 400 °C in our previous paper [30]. Recently, many results have been reported for the water-catalyzed gas-phase bimolecular reactions to understand the atmospheric chemistry, which reduce the energy barriers [3134].

Bimolecular mechanism requires the association of two molecules, which is considered to be normally less effective in the gas phase, particularly under diluted conditions, due to the increasing entropy. In spite of this criterion, cluster formation in gas phase is well known for the molecules that can form hydrogen-bonded complexes, such as carboxylic acids and alcohols. For example, methanol has been reported to exist as dimers, trimers, and oligomers along with monomer in the gas phase, based on the measurement of the deviation from the ideal gas behavior, thermal conductivity, infra-red spectrum, and so on [3545]. Furthermore, radical-molecule complexes are known to act as a prereactive complex for hydrogen abstraction by radicals such as OH in the gas phase [32, 33, 46, 47]. These lines of information lead to a hypothesis that some of the methyl glucoside molecules may form cluster in the gas phase, which rather reasonably explains the observation: transglycosylation of methyl glucosides occurs more efficiently in the gas phase. Extensive network of hydrogen bonding in the molten methyl glucosides may inhibit the proper association of the molecules forming TSs.

Several TSs can be drawn for the concerted mechanisms of gaseous LG (Fig. 8), but the complete recovery of the LG in the temperature range of 200–400 °C indicates that these reactions did not proceed unlike methyl glucosides. The instability of these TSs due to the steric effects of the bicyclic ring of LG would be an acceptable reason, and any TSs have not been identified, despite the computational trials of the theoretical calculations. 1,3-anhydroglucopyranose and 1,2;1,6-anhydroglucose obtained from TSs (A) and (C) would be unstable because of the inclusion of a sterically hindered four-membered ring and a bicyclic acetal system with a three membered epoxide ring, respectively.

Fig. 8
figure8

Transition states of the unimolecular concerted mechanisms for levoglucosan

Fragmentation

Radical-chain mechanisms are postulated for fragmentation of gaseous LG instead of heterolysis reactions from the kinetic data [12]. We discussed the different fragmentation reactivities (GlcαOMe > GlcβOMe > LG) in terms of the reactivities of the C- and O-centered radicals, which are formed through hydrogen abstractions by radical species from C–H and O–H groups, respectively. Although the selectivity of the hydrogen abstraction during pyrolysis is unclear, 1-C, 6-C, and 6-O radicals shown in Fig. 9 were considered, because reactivities of these radicals are expected to be different between methyl glucosides and LG. Radical-type 6-O cannot be formed from LG.

Fig. 9
figure9

Cleavable linkages (red bold lines) through β-elimination for C- and O-centered radicals from methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe), methyl β-glucoside GlcβOMe, and levoglucosan (LG)

To cleave the C‒C and C‒O bonds from radicals through β-scission reactions, these bonds must be in the same plane with the radical p orbitals [48]. The bonds that can be cleaved were limited, as shown with the red bold lines in Fig. 9. Although several β-scission reactions can occur for the radicals from GlcαOMe and GlcβOMe, no bonds are cleaved from the LG radicals because of the steric effects of bicyclic ring. Thus, these LG radicals may be stabilized as LG by the abstraction of hydrogen from other molecules.

Among the postulated β-scission reactions in Fig. 9, the 1-C radicals produce vinyl ethers A and B with different oxidation states at C2 (Fig. 10), and they show different bond dissociation energies of the C5‒O bonds, which were calculated as 35.9 kcal mol−1 for A from the α-anomer and 48.0 kcal mol−1 for B from the β-anomer. For fragmentation of LG, double bond formation to produce vinyl ether and conjugated carbonyl structures is suggested to promote the fragmentation reactions through forming lower bond dissociation energy bonds, which result in cleaving homolytically to form pairs of radicals to accelerate the radical-chain reactions [12]. Thus, this efficiency is expected to be greater for GlcαOMe, which reasonably explains the fragmentation reactivity: GlcαOMe > GlcβOMe.

Fig. 10
figure10

Vinyl ethers that can be formed through β-scission reactions of the 1-C radicals from methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe) and methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe) along with the bond dissociation energies of the vinyl ether C‒O bonds

Using the reactivity of gaseous glyceraldehyde as a model of LG degradation intermediates compared with that of glycerol, we reported that the introduction of C=O to polyalcohol significantly accelerated the fragmentation reactions by the progression of retro-aldol fragmentation and dehydration reactions [30]. Dehydration reaction is accelerated by the C=O group, because the C=O group increases the acidity of the adjacent C‒H group.

Fragmentation pathways via the 6-C and 6-O radicals formed from GlcαOMe and GlcβOMe are provisionally considered as illustrated in Fig. 11, although the pyrolysis reactions are considered to be more complex. A retro-aldol fragmentation via a six-membered TS (calculated activation energy: 36.2 kcal mol−1 for GlcαOMe) would proceed for the C6=O intermediate to form intermediate 1, which is further fragmented into GA and 2 by an additional retro-aldol fragmentation. Compound 2 with a weak vinyl ether bond would fragment further, which results in the formation of GO, GA and methyl radical. Alternatively, intermediate 1 would dehydrate to form 3 with a weak vinyl ether bond that is attached to a conjugated C=O, which is cleaved homolytically to GO, GA, along with radical 4. This radical can be converted further into MeGO and CO. Consequently, these postulated pathways reasonably explain the formation of the major fragmentation products, i.e., MeGO, GA, and GO, from the gaseous methyl glucosides at >400 °C. Fald would be formed from the fragmentation of GA. These reactions are not expected for LG with the C1–O–C6 linkage.

Fig. 11
figure11

Postulated fragmentation pathways for the C6=O intermediate formed from the 6-C and 6-O radicals of methyl α-glucoside (GlcαOMe) and methyl β-glucoside (GlcβOMe), with retro-aldol fragmentation and dehydration as key reactions

Radical-chain reactions via abstraction of hydrogens of more reactive (weaker) C‒H and O‒H bonds of allylic and vinyl alcohol structures would also proceed from the intermediates shown in Fig. 11.

Roles of molten- and gas-phase reactions in the pyrolysis of methyl glucosides

The product compositions from the gaseous methyl glucosides were different from those of the pyrolysis including molten-phase reactions. These features provide insights into the roles of molten- and gas-phase reactions during the pyrolysis of methyl glucoside (GlcOMe) as summarized in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12
figure12

Proposed mechanism for the pyrolysis of molten methyl glucoside (GlcOMe), focusing on the molten- and gas-phase reactions

Along with AGF, no furans (furfural and 5-HMF) were obtained from the pyrolysis of GlcOMe (gas) and LG (gas). Thus, the transformation from the pyranose to five-membered heterocyclic rings does not effectively proceed in the gas-phase pyrolysis. Hence, AGF and furan formations probably originate from the molten-phase reactions prior to evaporation into the gas phase.

The pyran-to-furan ring transformation is possible via the chain structure of glucose, which may form by hydrolysis reactions. The yields of AGF and furans are reported to change depending on the degree of polymerization, i.e., content of reducing end [2629], which can be converted into the chain structure. For example, Gardiner [26] reported the AGF yield decreased with the increase in the degree of polymerization: glucose (10.9%) > cellobiose (2.8%) > cellulose (1.5%), and Kato [49] reported the same tendency for the formation of furfural: glucose (11.7%) > cellobiose (7.7%) > cellulose (3.7%). These reported results support the above hypothesis.

Hydrolysis of cellulose is reported to proceed effectively during the pyrolysis in a sealed reactor [50, 51]. Recent studies [5254] also reported that the hydrolysis reactions proceed in a quasi-sealed space formed in the cell wall of cellulose and molten glycosides even during the pyrolysis with open-top reactors. Thus, hydrolysis by the produced water would proceed during the molten-phase pyrolysis of methyl glucosides and LG to form glucose, which is further converted into AGF, furfural, and 5-HMF, probably via the chain and furanose structures.

The evaporation process of GlcOMe and the product LG is expected to compete with the molten-phase reactions forming polysaccharides, AGF, furfural, and 5-HMF. The GlcOMe (gas) undergoes simpler reactions in the gas phase, i.e., transglycosylation to form LG (gas) and fragmentation. The greater stability of LG (gas) may be a reason why large amounts of LG are produced from the pyrolysis of GlcOMe, cellulose, and other glucose-based carbohydrates.

Conclusions

Pyrolytic reactivities of GlcOMe were studied only in the gas phase for the first time and compared with that of LG. The following results were obtained:

  1. 1.

    Unlike LG, phase transition from molten to gas phases increases the GlcOMe reactivity, and the gaseous GlcOMe selectively produces LG at low pyrolysis temperatures (200 and 300 °C), at which LG is completely stable.

  2. 2.

    Selective transglycosylation of GlcOMe can be explained with the uni- and bimolecular concerted heterolysis mechanisms.

  3. 3.

    The greater stability of LG for transglycosylation is explained by the steric effects of the bicyclic ring system.

  4. 4.

    Fragmentation of GlcOMe starts at 400 °C, although higher temperatures >500 °C are required for LG.

  5. 5.

    Difference in fragmentation reactivity (GlcαOMe > GlcβOMe) can be explained in terms of the radical-chain reactivity.

  6. 6.

    The AGF yields are low and no furans are obtained from the gaseous GlcOMe. These compounds are suggested to originate mainly from the molten-phase pyrolysis reactions.

  7. 7.

    Unconventional stability of LG against transglycosylation and fragmentation reactions is suggested to be a reason for the formation of large amounts of LG from the pyrolysis of carbohydrates including GlcOMe and cellulose.

  8. 8.

    These findings provide insights for the efficient production of LG from glucose-based carbohydrates and efficient gasification of cellulosic biomass.

References

  1. 1.

    Shafizadeh F, Furneaux RH, Cochran TG, Scholl JP, Sakai Y (1979) Production of levoglucosan and glucose from pyrolysis of cellulosic materials. J Appl Polym Sci 23:3525–3539

  2. 2.

    Kwon GJ, Kim DY, Kimura S, Kuga S (2007) Rapid-cooling, continuous-feed pyrolyzer for biomass processing. Preparation of levoglucosan from cellulose and starch. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 80:1–5

  3. 3.

    Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2008) Different pyrolytic pathways of levoglucosan in vapor- and liquid/solid-phases. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 83:64–70

  4. 4.

    Fukutome A, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2014) Gas- and coke-forming reactivities of cellulose-derived tar components under nitrogen and oxygen/nitrogen. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:98–108

  5. 5.

    Kawamoto H, Murayama M, Saka S (2003) Pyrolysis behavior of levoglucosan as an intermediate in cellulose pyrolysis: polymerization into polysaccharide as a key reaction to carbonized product formation. J Wood Sci 49:469–473

  6. 6.

    Bai X, Johnston P, Brown RC (2013) An experimental study of the competing processes of evaporation and polymerization of levoglucosan in cellulose pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 99:130–136

  7. 7.

    Kawamoto H, Morisaki H, Saka S (2009) Secondary decomposition of levoglucosan in pyrolytic production from cellulosic biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85:247–251

  8. 8.

    Shin EJ, Nimlos MR, Evans RJ (2001) Kinetic analysis of the gas-phase pyrolysis of carbohydrates. Fuel 80:1697–1709

  9. 9.

    Fukutome A, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2015) Processes forming gas, tar and coke in cellulose gasification from gas-phase reactions of levoglucosan as intermediate. ChemSusChem 8:2240–2249

  10. 10.

    Fukutome A, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2016) Molecular mechanisms for the gas-phase conversion of intermediates during cellulose gasification under nitrogen and oxygen/nitrogen. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 22:343–353

  11. 11.

    Pictet A (1918) On the transformation of levoglucoscine to dextrine. Helv Chim Acta 1:226–230

  12. 12.

    Fukutome A, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2017) Kinetics and molecular mechanisms for the gas-phase degradation of levoglucosan as a cellulose gasification intermediate. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2016.12.010

  13. 13.

    Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2007) Pyrolysis behaviors of wood and its constituent polymers at gasification temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 78:328–336

  14. 14.

    Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2006) Thermal stabilization of levoglucosan in aromatic substances. Carbohydr Res 341:2293–2297

  15. 15.

    Kawamoto H, Hosoya T, Ueno Y, Shoji T, Saka S (2014) Thermal stabilization and decomposition of simple glycosides in the presence of aromatic substances in closed ampoules. Role of OHπ hydrogen bonding. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 109:41–46

  16. 16.

    Matsuoka S, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2012) Retro-aldol-type fragmentation of reducing sugars preferentially occurring in polyether at high temperature. Role of the ether oxygen as a base catalyst. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 93:24–32

  17. 17.

    Kawamoto H, Ueno Y, Saka S (2013) Thermal reactivities of non-reducing sugars in polyether -Role of intermolecular hydrogen bondings in pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 103:287–292

  18. 18.

    Shafizadeh F, Fu LY (1973) Pyrolysis of cellulose. Carbohydr Res 29:113–122

  19. 19.

    Wolfrom ML, Thompson A, Ward RB (1959) The composition of pyrodextrins 2. Thermal polymerization of levoglucosan. J Am Chem Soc 81:4623–4625

  20. 20.

    Wolfrom ML, Ward RB, Horton D, Moore RH, Thompson A (1961) Composition of pyrodextrins 3. Thermal polymerization of levoglucosan. J Org Chem 26:4617–4620

  21. 21.

    Hosoya T, Nakao Y, Sato H, Kawamoto H, Sakaki S (2009) Thermal degradation of methyl beta-d-glucoside. A theoretical study of plausible reaction mechanisms. J Org Chem 74:6891–6894

  22. 22.

    Seshadri V, Westmoreland PR (2012) Concerted reactions and mechanism of glucose pyrolysis and implications for cellulose kinetics. J Phys Chem A 116:11997–12013

  23. 23.

    Mayes HB, Broadbelt LJ (2012) Unraveling the reactions that unravel cellulose. J Phys Chem A 116:7098–7106

  24. 24.

    Hosoya T, Sakaki S (2013) Levoglucosan formation from crystalline cellulose: importance of a hydrogen bonding network in the reaction. ChemSusChem 6:2356–2368

  25. 25.

    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JAJ, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford

  26. 26.

    Gardiner D (1966) Pyrolysis of some hexoses and derived di- tri- and poly-saccharides. J Chem Soc C Org, 1473–1476

  27. 27.

    Sanders EB, Goldsmith AI, Seeman JI (2003) A model that distinguishes the pyrolysis of d-glucose, d-fructose, and sucrose from that of cellulose. Application to the understanding of cigarette smoke formation. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 66:29–50

  28. 28.

    Patwardhan PR, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Shanks BH (2009) Product distribution from fast pyrolysis of glucose-based carbohydrates. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 86:323–330

  29. 29.

    Mettler MS, Paulsen AD, Vlachos DG, Dauenhauer PJ (2012) The chain length effect in pyrolysis: bridging the gap between glucose and cellulose. Green Chem 14:1284–2288

  30. 30.

    Fukutome A, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2016) Gas-phase reactions of glyceraldehyde and 1,3-dihydroxyacetone as a model for levoglucosan conversion during biomass gasification. ChemSusChem 9:703–712

  31. 31.

    Zhang W, Du B, Qin Z (2014) Catalytic effect of water, formic acid, or sulfuric acid on the reaction of formaldehyde with OH radicals. J Phys Chem A 118:4797–4807

  32. 32.

    Kaur R, Vikas (2016) Exploring the role of a single water molecule in the tropospheric reaction of glycolaldehyde with an OH radical: a mechanistic and kinetics study. RSC Adv 6:29080–29098

  33. 33.

    Anglada JM, Gonzalez J (2009) Different catalytic effects of a single water molecule: the gas-phase reaction of formic acid with hydroxyl radical in water vapor. ChemPhysChem 10:3034–3045

  34. 34.

    Vöhringer-Martinez E, Hansmann B, Hernandez H, Francisco JS, Troe J, Abel B (2007) Water catalysis of a radical-molecule gas-phase reaction. Science 315:497–501

  35. 35.

    Curtiss LA, Blander M (1988) Thermodynamic properties of gas-phase hydrogen-bonded complexes. Chem Rev 88:827–841

  36. 36.

    Matsumoto M, Yasuoka K (1994) Evaporation and condensation at a liquid surface. II. Methanol. J Chem Phys 101:7912–7917

  37. 37.

    Faubel M, Kisters Th (1989) Non-equilibrium molecular evaporation of carboxylic acid dimers. Nature 339:527–529

  38. 38.

    Weltner W Jr, pitzer KS (1951) Methyl alcohol: the entropy, heat capacity and polymerization equilibria in the vapor, and potential barrier to internal rotation. J Am Chem Soc 73:2606–2610

  39. 39.

    Fletcher AN (1971) Self-association of methanol vapor. Evidence for dimers and tetramers. J Phys Chem 75:1808–1814

  40. 40.

    Cheam V, Farnham SB, Christian SD (1970) Vapor phase association of methanol. Vapor density evidence for trimer formation. J Phys Chem 74:4157–4159

  41. 41.

    Renner TA, Kucera GH, Blander M (1977) A study of hydrogen bonding in methanol vapor by measurement of thermal conductivity. J Chem Phys 66:177–184

  42. 42.

    Mitev VM, Stefanov B, Ivanov LM, Georgiev GM (1985) Infrared absorption spectra of methanol vapor: dimer and tetramer contributions. J Mol Struct 129:11–15

  43. 43.

    Dixon JR, George WO, Hossain MF, Lewis R, Price JM (1997) Hydrogen-bonded forms of methanol IR spectra and ab initio calculations. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93:3611–3618

  44. 44.

    Huisken F, Stemmler M (1992) Infrared molecular beam depletion spectroscopy of size-selected methanol clusters. Z Phys D Atoms Mol Clusters 24:277–287

  45. 45.

    Shi YJ, Consta S, Das AK, Mallik B, Lacey D, Lipson RH (2002) A 118 nm vacuum ultraviolet laser/time-of-flight mass spectroscopic study of methanol and ethanol clusters in the vapor phase. J Chem Phys 116:6990–6999

  46. 46.

    Hansen JC, Francisco JS (2002) Radical-molecule complexes: changing our perspective on the molecular mechanisms of radical-molecule reactions and their impact on atmospheric chemistry. ChemPhysChem 3:833–840

  47. 47.

    Alvarez-Idaboy JR, Mora-Diez N, Boyd RJ, Vivier-Bunge A (2001) On the importance of prereactive complexes in molecule-radical reactions: hydrogen abstraction from aldehydes by OH. J Am Chem Soc 123:2018–2024

  48. 48.

    Parsons AF (2000) Radical reactions. In: An introduction to free radical chemistry. Blackwell Science Ltd, London, p 72

  49. 49.

    Kato K (1967) Pyrolysis of cellulose 3. Comparative studies of volatile compounds from pyrolysates of cellulose and its related compounds. Agric Biol Chem 31:657–663

  50. 50.

    Mok WSL, Antal MJ, Szabo P, Varhegyi G, Zelei B (1992) Formation of charcoal from biomass in a sealed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 31:1162–1166

  51. 51.

    Varhegyi G, Szabo P, Mok WSL, Antal MJ (1993) Kinetics of the thermal-decomposition of cellulose in sealed vessels at elevated pressures—effects of the presence of water on the reaction-mechanism. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 26:159–174

  52. 52.

    Yu Y, Liu D, Wu H (2012) Characterization of water-soluble intermediates from slow pyrolysis of cellulose at low temperatures. Energy Fuels 26:7331–7339

  53. 53.

    Matsuoka S, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2014) What is active cellulose in pyrolysis? An approach based on reactivity of cellulose reducing end. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 106:138–146

  54. 54.

    Matsuoka S, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2016) Reactivity of cellulose reducing end in pyrolysis as studied by methyl glucoside-impregnation. Carbohydr Res 420:46–50

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly conducted using the supercomputer system of the Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies, Kyoto University. This work was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Grant Number 24380095, 2012.4–2016.3) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16H04954.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruo Kawamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukutome, A., Kawamoto, H. & Saka, S. Gas-phase pyrolysis of methyl glucosides and levoglucosan. J Wood Sci 63, 295–306 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-017-1616-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Methyl glucoside
  • Levoglucosan
  • Gas-phase reactions
  • Concerted heterolysis
  • Cellulose pyrolysis