 Original Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Development and investigation of a hybrid builtup column made of small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees
Journal of Wood Science volume 64, pages356–363(2018)
Abstract
Small diameter logs from juvenile trees are heavily produced during the management of artificial forests around the world. As a kind of plentiful and inexpensive natural resource, the potential was not fully explored. So far the small diameter logs are mainly used as raw materials for products other than building materials. To utilize these small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees as structural members into wood construction, a kind of hybrid builtup column was developed and the performance was investigated experimentally and theoretically. It was found that column had good loadcarrying capacity. To apply the developed member in wood construction, the prediction method of the column was proposed. The effective slenderness ratio which took the shear deformations due to the bending of limbs and slip of nail connections between Ushaped nails and limbs into consideration was derived based on mechanics theory. The proposed prediction method was found to have good accuracy in predicting the loadcarrying capacity of the hybrid builtup column. This paper can promote the structural application of the small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees.
Introduction
Large quantities of juvenile trees exist in forests, especially in planted forests [1]. Not only do these overstocked stands increase the risk of insects, diseases, catastrophic fire potential, but they are costly to manage [2]. Increasing management emphasis on forest health forces the forest managers to seek economical treatments such as thinning to improve the stand condition. Parts of these juvenile trees are removed to make room for the growth of others, thus a large quantity of the juvenile small diameter logs are produced. The traditional processing methods fail to recognize the juvenile tree’s full value, as a kind of plentiful and inexpensive natural resource, the potential is not fully explored. So far small diameter logs from juvenile trees are mainly used as raw materials for products other than building materials, e.g. used as pulp to make paper or wood strips to make furniture panels, they are even used as firewood in some areas, thus economical and valueadded methods are urgently needed.
There are still some problems existed in engineering application of the small diameter logs. Difficulties are met in designing the connections between these logs which have small and strongly varying diameters. Moreover, the mechanical properties of small diameter logs from juvenile trees are different from timbers from mature trees, thus the design values listed in the design code are not suitable to the small diameter logs. Much effort has been made to increase the economic efficiency of this kind of material. The physical and mechanical properties of small diameter logs from juvenile trees were tested by researchers around the world, for example, Boren and Barnard [3] tested the bending and compression strength and stiffness of small diameter logs from juvenile Scots pine. Bao et al. [4] compared the properties of timber from juvenile and mature trees of four kinds of structurally used species in China. Olarescu et al. [5] investigated the mass loss, swelling coefficient and dimensional and shape stabilization during heat treatment of wood originating from juvenile and mature trees from the same forest parcel. Series of studies were conducted by researchers in Forest Products Laboratory to investigate the mechanical properties and the potential of the small diameter logs as structural members [6,7,8,9,10]. Stern [11] reviewed the effective connecting methods for small diameter logs to encourage the use of these timber as construction materials. Fredriksson et al. [12] utilized small diameter logs to produce cross laminated timber panels, in which the logs were sawn along the edge into tapered shape. Komariah et al. [13] determined the physical and mechanical properties of glued laminated timber manufactured from small diameter logs of three tropical species. Chrisp et al. [14] applied small diameter logs into the structural frame of a single story residential center. From the literature it is found that there is still no effective way to utilize the small diameter logs from juvenile trees as structural materials, a simple, economical and efficient way to make use of this kind of forestry byproduct is still needed.
The authors of this paper has developed one method to apply the small diameter logs from juvenile trees into the light wood frame construction as shearwalls [15] in which the small diameter logs were used in the form of hybrid builtup column. The lateral performance of the shearwall studded with the builtup column was investigated by experiment and finite element modeling. Builtup columns are widely used in steel structures [16], as for timber structures, to increase the section modulus and bearing capacity, builtup column and beam are also used. National design specification (NDS) [17] provides guidelines to calculate the loadcarrying capacity of nailed and bolted builtup column. Eurocode 5 [18] also contains some provisions about calculating the effective slenderness ratio of spaced and lattice columns.
In the present work, the vertical performance of the developed builtup column was investigated by experiment and theoretical analysis. The results of this work contribute to application of small diameter logs as structural members, and can promote the valueadded application of small diameter logs from juvenile trees.
Experimental investigation
Formation of the developed hybrid builtup column
There are usually two kinds of builtup timber columns used in the field of building engineering, i.e. the spaced column and the lattice column. As shown in Fig. 1, a spaced column is composed of two or more limbs intermittently connected with packs or gussets, the limbs cannot rotate at the fix point because of the restrain of packs or gussets. A lattice column consists of usually two limbs connected by diagonals continuously anchored to the limbs by nails or glue.
To apply the small diameter logs from juvenile trees into timber structures, a kind of hybrid builtup column was developed. The hybrid builtup column, which utilized pairs of crossing placed diagonals between the two limbs, was different from both spaced and lattice columns. A pair of crossing diagonals could be treated as a quasigusset plate, and the segment of column covered by the quasigusset could be treated as lattice column, thus the developed builtup column was a kind of hybrid builtup column.
A piece of small diameter log can be sawn into two halves to obtain two semicircular limbs. To assemble these two limbs into a builtup column, a channelshaped apparatus was made by nailing 3 solid timber together, as shown in Fig. 2. The apparatus had an inner space whose width was the same with the builtup column. Two limbs were insert into the channel with their flat surfaces closely contacted with the solid timber, then Ushaped nails were driven at corresponding positions by hammer. Turn the halffinished buildup column and nail the other side up, a builtup column was manufactured. The hybrid builtup column was easy to manufacture and it converted irregular logs into regular members with two parallel surfaces, the hybrid builtup column was similar to dimension lumber and can be used as stud of shearwalls.
Materials and methods
To investigate the performance of hybrid builtup column, specimens were manufactured with Northeast China larch (Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen) whose diameters ranging from 40 to 100 mm, a sketch of the hybrid builtup column is shown in Fig. 3.
The limbs of the hybrid builtup column were manufactured with semicircular cross section small diameter logs, which can be manufactured easily by splitting a round timber into two halves. The Ushaped nails, also named staple, were adopt as the diagonals. The crown of Ushaped nail was about 160 mm in length with tapered slope whose maximum diameter was about 8 mm, the leg of the Ushaped nail was about 35 mm long with a diameter around 3–4 mm. The Ushaped nail was made by commonly used Q235 lowcarbon steel per Chinese code, with a characteristic yield strength of 235 MPa. The position of the Ushaped nails was determined before test based on the concept that the limbs should not bulked before the integrated column. The angle between the axis of the column and the crown of Ushaped nail was about 45°, this angle was chosen based on design concept of Vtruss lattice column, the diagonal works in an optimum way in this situation, as indicated in equation C.18 in Eurocode 5 [18].
36 hybrid builtup columns were manufactured and every 3 of them were assembled together as one walltype model. Thus, 12 test models were manufactured, 6 of which were loaded axially and designated as C1–C6, the other 6 were loaded eccentrically with an eccentricity of 35 mm and designated as E1–E6. 8 Ushaped nails were applied to both sides of the builtup column at a distance of 575 mm. The 3 builtup columns in one model were linked together by 2 in. × 6 in. SPF (SprucePineFir) dimension lumber top and bottom plates and some 9.5 mm thick oriented strand board (OSB) panels discontinuously sheathed at the outside of the column. The OSB panels were sheathed discontinuously to function as inplane lateral supports for 3 builtup columns while not affecting their loadcarrying capacity. Builtup columns in the test model can only buckle out of the wall plane under vertical load. Both ends of the builtup column were connected to top and bottom plates by four 3.8 mm × 80 mm nails. The OSB panels were connected to the limbs with 2.8 mm × 50 mm nails. All of the nails were hand driven. The height of the builtup column plus the top and bottom plates was 2440 mm (8 ft.), which was same as the height of a sheathing panel typically used in light wood frame construction.
As shown in Fig. 4, a oneway steel hinge was placed at each end of the test model, the total height of the test model and two hinges was 2550 mm. The models were axially loaded by a universal test machine at the speed of 2 mm/min. The vertical load and displacement were recorded at the frequency of 1 Hz by a computer controlled data acquisition system.
Besides the loadcarrying capacity, the sectional dimensions at two ends and twothirdpoint of each column in every test model were measured, totally 72 groups of dimension data were obtained. The sectional properties including the average area of a single limb A_{limb}, the average area moment of inertia of a single limb to its weak axis I_{limb}, the average sectional area of a column A_{column} and the average moment of inertia of column I_{column} were calculated and listed in Table 1.
The bending strength and modulus of elasticity of the small diameter logs were determined by testing 16 pieces 2000 mm long round timber via Metriguard 312 bending proof tester (Metriguard Inc., Washington, USA). The tensile strength of the small diameter logs was determined by testing 16 pieces 2000 mm long round timber via Metriguard 412 tension (Metriguard Inc., Washington, USA) proof tester, and the compression strength of the timber was determined by testing 13 pieces 300 mm round timber by a universal test machine. All of the test were conducted in accordance with ASTM D 4761 [19]. It must be pointed out that the round timber used to determine the mechanical properties were sawn to the desired length and no extra processing was made, thus the determined mechanical properties were thought to be representative.
Test results
It was found that all of the test model buckled under vertical load, as shown in Fig. 5. There was no lateral displacement noticeable before buckling. After the peak load, load dropped swiftly and local failures were observed in the test model. However, these postbuckling phenomenon did not affect the loadcarrying capacity of the hybrid builtup column.
The loadvertical displacement curves of the axial compression models are shown in Fig. 6, C1 was not included for the sake of malfunction of the vertical displacement gauge in the process of testing, however, the vertical load was recorded and the peak load of C1 was 71.01 kN. The loadvertical displacement curves of the eccentric compression models are shown in Fig. 7.
The minimum loadcarrying capacity of the axial compression models was 65.05 kN and the maximum is 82.95 kN, the average was 73.85 kN with a coefficient of variation of 8.12%. The tested loadcarrying capacity was then divided by 3 to calculate the bearing loadcarrying capacity of a column. The average of a builtup column was 24.62 kN. While the loadcarrying capacity of the test models under eccentric load ranged between 52.65 and 70.95 kN, with an average of 64.78 kN and coefficient of variation of 9.04%. The average of a builtup column under eccentric load was 21.59 kN.
The average compression strength of a 2 in. × 4 in. SPF dimension lumber of No. 2 is 28.25 MPa [20], the computed buckling average loadcarrying capacity of a SPF stud with a length of 2550 mm and hinge supports at two ends was 27.16 kN as per Chinese timber design code GB50005 [21], but mean value of the lumber strength was taken, instead of the design value. This indicated that the hybrid builtup column can be used as a substitute of 2 in. × 4 in. SPF dimension lumber as they have similar bearing capacity.
Theoretical investigation
Derivation of the equation of effective slenderness ratio
The loadcarrying capacity of the hybrid builtup stud was obtained by experiment, however, to utilize the column in engineering practice, the prediction method of the loadcarrying capacity of the member needs to be proposed.
Vertical load imposed on a builtup column will induce shear deformations due to the bending of the chord members, deformation of web member and deformation of the connection between web member and chord member. To predict the loadcarrying capacity of the builtup column, the effective slenderness ratio of the builtup column needs to be worked out. The Euler formula can be expressed as [16]:
where N_{cr} is the Euler buckling load considering shear deformation; E is the modulus of elasticity of the limbs of the builtup column; A_{tot} is the cross sectional area of the builtup column; λ is the slenderness ratio for a solid column with the same length, the same area and the same second moment of area as the builtup column, can be calculated by Eq. 2:
where l_{E} is the effective length of the builtup column and i is the gyration radius of the column, i is known as:
In which I_{tot} is the second moment of area of the builtup column. When considering shear deformation, λ is replaced by λ_{ef}, which is the effective slenderness radio of the builtup column, can be written as:
In which N_{E} is the Euler load without considering shear deformation; \(\gamma\) is the shear deformations caused by unit shear force.
A segment of the hybrid builtup column is shown in Fig. 8a, by analyzing the formation of the column, it can be found that the shear deformations \(\gamma\) of the column under unit shear force consists of 3 parts:
As shown in Fig. 8b, a pair of crossing placed Ushaped nails is regarded as a quasigusset between the two limbs, then the builtup column is considered as a multistoried rigid frame, i.e. the spaced column. In this frame, the quasigussets are treated as beams and the limbs are treated as columns. For spaced column, the shear deformation \({\gamma _1}\) is rises from the bending of limbs, and the effective slenderness ratio considering this part of shear deformation can be expressed as [18]:
where
where λ_{1} is the slenderness ratio for the limbs; I_{1} and A_{1} are area moment of inertia and the crosssectional area of a single limb, respectively; a is the length shown in Fig. 8; n is the number of limbs; η is a factor which can be taken 4.5 per Eurocode 5 [18].
Besides in the hybrid builtup column, the pseudogussets are not actual gussets, they can actually deform under shear force due to slipping of the connections between the Ushaped nails and the two limbs and elongation or contraction of the Ushaped nails, as shown in Fig. 8c. The stiffness of the Ushaped nails is much higher than that of the nail connection, thus the shear deformation due to the deformation of Ushaped nail can be neglected. To calculate the contribution of the slip of the connection between the Ushaped nails and limbs Δ, the builtup column within the Ushaped nails can be treated as a Vshaped lattice column. For lattice column, the shear deformation \({\gamma _{\text{2}}}\) rises mainly from the slip between diagonals and limbs, and for a nailed connection, the effective slenderness ratio can be expressed as [18]:
In which
where n_{n} is the number of nails contributing to the shear deformation in all diagonals. h is thickness of the limb along the direction of deformation. A_{1} is the area of a limb. θ is the angle between the axis of crown of Ushaped nails and the column. K is the slip modulus of one nail connection, which can be expressed, according to Eurocode 5 [18], as:
where ρ is the mean density of the wood member; d_{L} is the diameter of the leg of the Ushaped nail.
Based on the derivation above, for the hybrid builtup column the effective slenderness ratio taking into consideration of the shear deformations resulting from bending of the limbs and slip of connection can be expressed as:
Prediction of loadcarrying capacity of the builtup column
To calculate the loadcarrying capacity of a hybrid builtup column, the stability coefficient needs to be worked out. As introduce in Eurocode 5 [18], the stability coefficient k_{c} can be expressed as:
In which
where λ and λ_{rel} are slenderness ratios and relative slenderness ratios corresponding to bending about the selected axis, respectively. To calculate the stability coefficient of the hybrid builtup column, λ needs to be replaced by the effective slenderness ratio λ_{ef} in Eq. 10. β_{c} is a factor for members within the straightness limits, i.e. 0.2 for solid timber.
For the test models, the gyration radius i of an equivalent solid column was calculated as 49.5 mm, thus the slenderness ratio λ was 51.5; The gyration radius for a limb was 13.0 mm and the calculated slenderness ratio λ_{1} was 44.4; n was taken as 2 and n_{n} was taken as 4; The average compression strength parallel to grain was 42.0 MPa, obtained from compression tests of 300 mm small diameter logs specimens; For Ushaped nails with 3.5 mmdiameter legs, the slip stiffness K was calculated as 493 N/mm; θ was 45° for the test models; The effective length was taken as 2550 mm for the hinged column. Substituting these parameters into Eq. 10, the effective slenderness ratio of the hybrid column was 159.1. Then substitute the calculated effective slenderness ratio into Eq. 11, the stability coefficient was worked out as 0.099.
The loadcarrying capacity of the developed hybrid builtup column can be calculated as:
where σ_{c} is the critical stress due to buckling, which is often expressed by Eq. 15 in the design code of most countries:
where f_{c} is the compression strength parallel to grain. It should be point out that mean value of lumber, instead of the design value, was taken to make a comparison between the prediction and experiment. The stability coefficient for the axial compression model k_{c} was 0.099, and the calculated loadcarrying capacity considering buckling was 23.31 kN, which was very close to the test result of 24.62 kN, the error was only 5.3%.
For the eccentrically loaded builtup column, bending stress due is introduced, in Eurocode 5, the governing design function was provided as [18]:
where f_{m} is the bending strength, mean value of 67.2 MPa is taken here, which was obtained from bending tests of 2000 mm long small diameter logs specimens. σ_{m} is the bending stress due to eccentric load, can be worked out as:
where e is the eccentric distance, 35 mm. I_{column} is the average moment of inertia of column, listed in Table 1, y_{max} is the maximum distance from neutral axis, 70 mm. Substitute Eqs. 14 and 17 into Eq. 16, and take the area properties listed in Table 1, the stability coefficient k_{c} for the eccentric compression model was 0.093. The maximum load bearing capacity of the eccentrically loaded builtup column can be worked out as 20.29 kN, which was very close to the test result 21.39 kN, also. The error was 5.56%.
Conclusions
To efficiently utilize small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees as structural materials, a hybrid builtup column fabricated with small diameter logs was developed and the performance was investigated experimentally and theoretically. The results of this paper can contribute to application of small diameter logs as structural members. The main conclusions are list as follows:

1.
The derived equation of effective slenderness ratio, in which Eurocode 5 [18] equations were used and combined in a previously not presented manner to take into consideration of the shear deformation due to bending of limbs and slip of connection between Ushaped nail and limbs, had good accuracy when used to calculate the stability coefficient and to predict the loadcarrying capacity of the hybrid builtup column developed in this paper.

2.
The developed hybrid builtup column can be manufactured easily, and had good loadcarrying capacity under vertical load, thus it provided an effective way to utilizing the small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees as construction materials.

3.
The failure mode of the developed hybrid builtup column was buckling under vertical load, no local failure was observed before peak load.

4.
The mean loadcarrying capacity of the developed hybrid builtup column of 2440 mm height was 24.62 kN with the given configuration, which had the potential be used as a substitute of the dimension lumber stud.
References
 1.
Wang X, Ross RJ, Punches J, Barbour RJ, Forsman JW., Erickson JR (2003) Evaluation of smalldiameter timber for valuedadded manufacturinga stress wave approach. In: Proceedings second international precision forestry symposium, 2003 June 15–17, Seattle WA. pp 91–96
 2.
Levangreen SL, Livingston J (2001) Exploring the uses for smalldiameter trees. For Prod J 51(9):10–21
 3.
Boren H, Barnard G (2000) Analysis of the strength and stiffness properties for small diameter round Scots pine timber tested in bending and compression parallel to the grain. Paperi Ja PuuPaper Timber 82(1):48–56
 4.
Bao FC, Jiang ZH, Jiang XM, Lu XX, Luo XQ (1998) Comparative studies on wood properties of juvenile vs. mature wood and plantation vs. natural forest of main plantation tree species in China. Sci Silvae Sinicae 34(2):63–76
 5.
Olarescu CM, Campean M, Olarescu A (2014) Dimensional stabilization of wood originating from smalldiameter trees through heat treatment. Bioresources 9(3):4844–4861
 6.
Wolfe R, Moseley C (2000) Smalldiameter log evaluation for valueadded structural applications. For Prod J 50(10):48–58
 7.
Wolfe R (2000) Research challenges for structural use of smalldiameter round timbers. For Prod J 50(2):21–29
 8.
Wang X, Ross RJ, Mattson JA, Erickson JR, Forsman JW, Geske EA, Wehr MA (2002) Nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing modulus of elasticity and stiffness of smalldiameter logs. For Prod J 52(2):79–85
 9.
Cumbo DW, Smith RL, Cwiii B (2004) Value analysis of lumber produced from smalldiameter timber. For Prod J 54(10):29–34
 10.
Wolfe R, Murphy J (2005) Strength of smalldiameter round and tapered bending members. For Prod J 55(3):50–55
 11.
Stern EG (2001) Construction with smalldiameter roundwood. Anal Biochem 2(3):216–220
 12.
Fredriksson M, Bomark P, Broman O, Gronlund A (2015) Using small diameter logs for crosslaminated timber production. Bioresources 10(1):1477–1486
 13.
Komariah RN, Hadi YS, Massijaya MY, Suryana J (2015) Physical–mechanical properties of glued laminated timber made from tropical smalldiameter logs grown in Indonesia. J Korean Wood Sci Technol 43(2):156–167
 14.
Chrisp TM, Cairns J, Gulland C (2003) The development of roundwood timber pole structures for use on rural community technology projects. Constr Build Mater 17(4):269–279
 15.
Wu GF, Zhu EC, Zhou HJ, Pan JL (2015) Testing and modelling of shearwalls studded with smalldiameter round timber under cyclic lateral load. Constr Build Mater 77(77):288–296
 16.
Xiao Y, Anderson JC (2007) Design of steel structures. Higher Education Press, Beijing
 17.
ANSI/AWC NDS2015 (2015) National design specification for wood construction. American Wood Council, Washington, DC
 18.
EN 199511 (2004) Eurocode 5: design of timber structurespart 1–1: generalcommon rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
 19.
ASTM D 4761 (2011) Standard test methods for mechanical properties of lumber and woodbase structural material. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
 20.
Barrett JD, Jones ED, Lau W (1994) Canadian lumber properties. Canadian Wood Council, Ottawa
 21.
GB 500052003 (2005) Code for design of timber structures. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the financial support from Chinese Academy of Forestry Fundamental Research Fund (CAFYBB2017SY036).
Author information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, G., Zhu, E., Zhong, Y. et al. Development and investigation of a hybrid builtup column made of small diameter logs originating from juvenile trees. J Wood Sci 64, 356–363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1008601716891
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
 Loadcarrying capacity
 Juvenile round timber
 Builtup column
 Effective slenderness ratio
 Timber structure