Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Journal of Wood Science Cover Image

Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of four rattan species grown in China

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

Rattan cane is an important forest product only second to timber and bamboo, with higher economic value and ecological benefits. Physical and mechanical properties are more important quality performance indexes, which are highly correlated with the processing and utilization of rattan cane. The present paper describes a study of main physical and mechanical properties in different heights of rattan cane for four rattan species, and also makes a comparison of property for Calamus simplicifolius grown in different sites. The relationship between species, cane position, density and mechanical properties of the rattan in China is also discussed. The results show that the physical and mechanical properties differ among four rattan species, and they follow irregular variation pattern with height. The physical–mechanical properties have no significant difference among species except modulus of elasticity, and the same as the different geographical areas. The basic density and mechanical properties gave a more moderate correlation with quadric equation. This result will provide basic data support for property modification and commercial utilization of rattan resources.

Introduction

Rattan is a multi-purpose plant resource with long tough slender stems found mostly in the tropical rainforests, and has a high economic value which can be considered as a material with high potential in the construction industry [1]. Rattan cane is an important forest product only second to timber and bamboo, and is extensively used as an excellent natural material for furniture, ropes, decorative items, housing, craft products, and also as an innovative bone implant materials [2,3,4]. The physical–mechanical properties of rattan are the most important and most direct performance indicator to determine cane processing and utilization, while the most important factors that influence physical–mechanical properties are species, stem position, density and so on [5]. The density will directly affect the strength, hardness, natural durability, and many other performance indicators of physical and mechanical properties.

From the 1860s, the study on physical and mechanical properties of some rattan species began to increase in the Southeast Asia region, including major effecting factor to mechanical strength, and cane grading based on mechanical strength [5,6,7,8,9]. Research on physical and mechanical properties of rattan in China is mainly focused on Daemonorops margaritae, Calamus tetradactylus and C. simplicifolius, including test methods, specific gravity, shrinkage, longitudinal compressive strength, tensile strength, hardness, wear resistance, bending strength, shear strength parallel to the grain and micromechanics [10,11,12,13]. However, the research on rattan property still lacks systematic basic data. There were no universal international standards to test, and the available results have been obtained by different techniques and methods. As yet, a complete picture of the quadruple interplay between species, cane position, density and mechanical properties of the rattan in China is missing.

Calamus consists of more species and grows over a large area with excellent properties and extensive commercial uses, while studies on it are now quite scarce [10,11,12]. The present paper describes a study of basic density, tensile property, bending property, compression strength and impact toughness in different heights of rattan cane for four rattan species distributed in Hainan and Yunnan province, and also makes a comparison of property for C. simplicifolius grown in different geographical areas of Guangxi and Hainan. The study of physical–mechanical properties of four rattan species, will reveal characteristics of mechanical behavior, provide reliable basic data and promote reasonable use for rattan industry development and standard’s establishment in China.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

Four rattan species were obtained from Guangxi, Hainan and Yunnan province, the main rattan regions, and the species are listed in Table 1. Ten healthy rattans of each species with approximately same diameter in straight part were chosen in accordance with the standard sample collection and preparation for properties of rattan cane—part 1: physical and mechanical properties [14]. The leaves and top young parts were removed, followed by subdividing the main culm into 2 m intervals. Thereafter, the canes were transported to the laboratory and stored in air-dry condition.

Table 1 The materials of rattan species in the investigation

Methods

Five canes of each species with almost similar internode length and total internode number were prepared. To analyze longitudinal variations of the cane, each cane was divided into several height intervals, with 5 internodes in each height interval, numbered from the base. If there was a bend or damage in the internode, it will be replaced by a neighboring regular one. The key processes of sample preparation are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic diagram of sample preparation

The prepared samples were placed in a temperature and humidity chamber with 20 °C, and relative humidity 65% for 40–60 days until samples moisture up to 9–15%. In each height interval, a 2-cm-long cane was cut for measuring the density from C. yunnanensis with small diameter, and the density specimens from other three species with larger diameter were dissected into cortex and core of cane. A 4.5-cm-long sample was prepared to measure compressive strength, and 16-cm-long sample for impact toughness and bending strength. As there is no published international standards to test the physical–mechanical properties of rattan cane, the tests of tension property (tension strength TS, tension modulus TM, MPa) and bending property (modulus of rupture MOR, modulus of elasticity MOE, MPa) through a 16-cm-long sample were carried out according to methods outlined by Lv et al. [10, 11], and other mechanical properties, including compressive strength (CS, MPa) and impact toughness (IT, MPa) were analyzed following the bamboo standards using Instron mechanical testing machine and impact testing machine [15]. Three-point bending strength and modulus were evaluated. The basic density was measured by the method of water content. Average values of 30 measurements were considered in the each portion analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 20, IBM Company). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at α = 5% was performed to determine if there were significant differences in species and height at the different independent mechanical variables. Likewise, relationships between basic density and mechanical properties were analyzed with a simple linear and quadric equation regression.

Results and discussion

The basic density

The results showed that basic density range from 0.33 to 0.36 g/cm3 in core, 0.52–0.60 g/cm3 in cortex of cane for three rattan species with larger diameter, the density of cortex was larger than that in core (Table 2). The maximum of density in core and cortex are both present in C. nambariensis var. yingjiangensis. The basic density of rattan cane is closely related to composition, structure and extracts of cell wall [5, 12, 16, 17]. Larger vascular bundle density, thicker fiber cell wall and smaller cell size in cortex tends to higher basic density than that in core. The variation of rattan’s density is not only determined by its own genetic characteristics, but also positively or negatively affected by some external factors, such as climate, soil and hydrology, etc. [18].

Table 2 The basic density in different cane height of four rattan species (g/cm3)

The average density of core and cortex is taken as the density of the cane for the above-mentioned three rattan species with larger diameter, compared with C. yunnanensis. Considering the overall basic density, it was observed that there is a great deal of irregular variation between the culm heights (Table 2), which is not similar to the findings by Tesoro [19]. The cane of different heights is formed within a certain rattan age, and a previous study indicates that the basic density is significantly higher as the canes mature [9]. In general, the age and height will affect the physical properties [20,21,22]. Bhat [5, 16] reported that rattan density along the stem (base to top) was highly affected by proportion of fibers, fiber wall thickness, the ratio of wall thickness to lumen diameter and metaxylem vessel diameter. Fiber wall thickness is the most important anatomical feature determining the physical properties of rattan cane [23]. The basic density tended to decrease with cane height from the basal towards the top portion, which the relationship is probably related to the numerous fiber cells with thicker wall thickness, smaller lumen diameter, and smaller metaxylem vessel element distributed in the basal cane compared to the upper portion. On the whole, it conforms to the research law of predecessors that the basic density decreases gradually from the base to top. But for the four rattan species, the variation between the culm heights diverged from each other.

Generally mean density differed among four species, and the differences were not statistically significant, only by 0.05 g/cm3. The rattan cane becomes fragile when its basic density was lesser than 0.25 g/cm3. The above-mentioned four species have higher basic density and hence they can be used in reinforced part in furniture and decorations with better flexibility [24]. The ANOVA showed that there is no significant difference in the basic density among rattan species and cane height (Table 3).

Table 3 ANOVA on mechanical properties of four rattan species at different heights

Mechanical properties

Mean values of different mechanical properties for four rattan species are tabulated in Table 4. Comparing the mechanical properties of four rattan species, C. yunnanensis cane appeared to be the strongest as it displayed highest mean values of tensile properties (TS and TM) and bending properties (MOR and MOE) as well as relatively high CS. In contrast, C. simplicifolius had the lowest strength with exceptionally low values of TS and MOR. The rest of two species had no apparent difference in mechanical properties except the values of MOE and IT. The CS and MOR ranged from 24.93 to 27.75 MPa and 54.13 to 72.32 MPa, respectively, in which the former was less than half of the latter. IT of rattans ranged from 22.56 to 53.81 MPa. The IT in C. nambariensis var. yingjiangensis is the largest, more than twice that of the other three rattan species, suggested that C. nambariensis var. yingjiangensis will be more resistant to external impact loads.

Table 4 Comparison of physical–mechanical properties of four rattan species

The mechanical strength of rattan is closely related to its structure and chemical composition. Rattan is a natural fiber bio-composite, consisting of unidirectional fibers as a reinforcement, and parenchymatous ground tissue as a matrix. When rattan reaches the destruction, the total deformation is larger, but the ratio of limit deformation to total deformation is smaller. The rattan has better plastic deformation and flexibility due to its higher proportion of parenchyma. The compression strength, tensile strength, tensile modulus is positively correlated with density and fiber proportion, and negatively correlated with parenchyma proportion [7]. The rattan with cortex presents strong bending characteristics, which may be due to large cellulose content in cortex [25].

Compared to commercial species Calamus manna, with 93.88, 2320 and 37.11 MPa for MOR, MOE and CS, respectively [12], the mechanical properties of four rattan species in this study is significantly lower than that in Calamus manna (Table 4). Therefore, four rattan species cannot be applied to a key load-bearing part of furniture only when any modification method used to improve the cane quality.

Influence of species and geographical areas on mechanical properties

The mechanical strength of rattan is affected by factors such as age, position, fiber ratio, density and water content. The ANOVA of the mechanical properties revealed that the species had a highly significant effect on the MOE (Table 3). The cane of C. yunnanensis has good mechanical property, but it is still limited in use due to its relatively small diameter.

The physical–mechanical properties of C. simplicifolius have no significant difference within species, and same as the different geographical areas (Table 5). Specimens collected from Guangxi and Hainan, which have a subtropical and tropical monsoon climate, respectively, representing different sunshine conditions, according to what Abasolo and Lomboy [18] observed in their point of view palasan plants that are partially exposed to the sun produced the same type of cane as a fully exposed individual. C. simplicifolius grown in Guangxi province has larger MOR and MOE than that in Hainan province.

Table 5 Comparison of physical–mechanical properties of C. simplicifolius in different locations

Influence of cane position on mechanical properties

The variation of mechanical strength presents irregular and indefinite pattern from the base towards apex (Fig. 2), which was not consistent with the findings by Bhat et al. [7] on India rattans where mechanical properties like MOR and TS decrease from the base to the top within a stem. TS, CS, and MOR were unaltered by the pattern of longitudinal variation.

Fig. 2
figure2

The axial variation of mechanical properties of 4 rattan species (H represents height interval, H1–H5: from base to top. A C. simplicifolius, B C. nambariensis var. yingjiangensis, C C. yunnanensis, D C. nambariensis var. xishuangbannaensis)

Influence of basic density on mechanical properties

Usually, from the outside to the inside, from the base up, the strength of the rattan material is reduced, which is related to the change trend of fiber ratio and density [7]. The correlations of the basic density and mechanical properties are summarized in Table 6. The basic density was significantly positive with each mechanical index, except MOE. Statistical analysis was then carried out to establish a linear and quadric equation regression between basic densities and mechanical properties (Fig. 3). Regression showed that basic density and mechanical properties gave a more moderate correlation with quadric equation, which had a higher correlation coefficient compared with linear. This is opposite to that of wood and bamboo where the linear model has a slightly larger correlation coefficient (R2) than the curve model [26, 27]. It also appeared that the moderate relationship of basic density to tensile strength (R2 = 0.6972), modulus of tension (R2 = 0.7084), and compression strength (R2 = 0.8349), the rest of the properties were minimally affected. Equations (1), (2) and (3) show a strong correlation with R2 values of 0.6972, 0.7084 and 0.8349, respectively.

Table 6 Correlations of the basic density and mechanical properties
Fig. 3
figure3

Relation between density and mechanical properties

$$y = { 1526}. 8x^{ 2} - { 132}0. 3x + { 327}. 8 9$$
(1)
$$y = { 39468}x^{ 2} - { 32}0 6 6x + { 8569}. 9$$
(2)
$$y = { 537}. 2 9x^{ 2} - { 455}. 2 8x + { 12}0. 6$$
(3)

Conclusions

The measured physical and mechanical properties differ among four rattan species. Species do not significantly influence the mechanical properties except MOE. The basic density and mechanical properties follow irregular and indefinite variation pattern with height from the base to the top. In addition, basic density and mechanical properties gave a more moderate correlation with quadric equation.

Four rattan species have favorable mechanical properties and they can prove to be a good eco-friendly, sustainable material for green furniture. But the mechanical property is also clearly lower than that in commercial species Calamus manna, still limited to wide utilization for natural cane.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BD:

basic density

TS:

tension strength

TM:

tension modulus

CS:

compressive strength

IT:

impact toughness

MOR:

modulus of rupture

MOE:

modulus of elasticity

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

References

  1. 1.

    Akpenpuun TD, Adeniran KA, Okanlawon OM (2017) Rattan cane reinforced concrete slab as a component for agricultural structures. Nigierian J Pure Appl Sci 30(1):3007–3013

  2. 2.

    Olorunnisola AO, Adefisan OO (2007) Trial production and testing of cement-bonded particleboard from rattan furniture waste. Wood Fibre Sci 34:116–124

  3. 3.

    Adefisan OO (2011) Suitability of Eremospatha macrocarpa canes for the production of cement-bonded composites. J Trop For Sci 23(4):379–382

  4. 4.

    Eichenseer C, Will J, Rampf M, Wend S, Greil P (2010) Biomorphous porous hydroxyapatite-ceramics from rattan. J Mat Sci Mater Med 21:131–137

  5. 5.

    Bhat KM, Mohan V (1991) Anatomical basis for density and shrinkage behavior of rattan stem. J Inst Wood Sci 12(3):123–130

  6. 6.

    Sekhar AC, Rawat BS (1965) Strength tests on Indian canes (i) Calamus tenuis. Indian For 91:70–72

  7. 7.

    Bhat KM, Thulasidas PK (1992) Strength properties of ten South Indian canes. J Trop For Sci 5(1):26–34

  8. 8.

    Abd Razak MA, Abdul Latif M, Khoo KC, Jamaludin K (1995) Physical properties, fibre dimensions and proximate chemical analysis of Malaysian rattans. Thai J For. 14:59–70

  9. 9.

    Wahab R, Sulaiman O, Samsi HW (2004) Basic density and strength properties of cultivated Calamus manan. J Bamboo Rattan 3(1):35–43

  10. 10.

    Lv WH, Liu XE, Wang YH (2010) The test methods of axial tensile strength of rattan canes. Wood Process Mach 1:20–23

  11. 11.

    Lv WH, Liu XE (2012) Testing on the method of bending strength of rattan cane. Wood Process Mach 1:1–5

  12. 12.

    Shang LL, Liu XE, Lv HF, Jiang ZH, Yang SM, Tian GL (2014) Physical and mechanical properties of Plectocomia assamica Grift and Calamus manna. J Northeast For Univ 42(12):123–129

  13. 13.

    Liu XE, Wang R, Tian GL, Yang SM, Wang YH, Jiang ZH (2014) Tensile properties of single rattan fibers. Wood Fiber Sci 46(4):1–8

  14. 14.

    LY/T 2220.1-2013 (2013) Sample collection and preparation for properties of rattan cane—Part 1: physical and mechanical properties. State Forestry Administration: Beijing

  15. 15.

    GB/T 15780-1995 (1995) Testing methods for physical and mechanical properties of bamboos. State Bureau of Technical Supervision: Beijing

  16. 16.

    Bhat KM, Verghese M (1989) Anatomical basis for the physical behavior of rattans. IAWA Bull 10(3):334–335

  17. 17.

    Ebanyenle E, Oteng-Amoako AA (2005) Variation in some anatomical and physical properties of stems of five rattan palm species of Ghana. J Bamboo Rattan 4(2):125–142

  18. 18.

    Abasolo WP, Lomboy OC (2009) Influence of growth rate, elevation and sunlight on the anatomical and physico-mechanical properties of plantation-grown Palasan (Calamus merrillii Becc.) Canes. Philipp J Sci 138(1):55–66

  19. 19.

    Tesoro FO (1987) Rattan processing and utilization research in the Philippines. In: Rao AN, Vongkaluang I (eds) Proceeding of international rattan seminar. Thailand Chiangmai. pp 169–177

  20. 20.

    Kabir MF, Bhattacharjee DK, Sattar MA (1993) Influence of height on the physical and mechanical properties of golla cane (Daemonorops jenkinsiana). Bangladesh J For Sci 22(1/2):52–56

  21. 21.

    Kabir MF, Bhattacharjee DK, Sattar MA (1994) Variation of physical and mechanical properties of Calamus erectus. Bangladesh J For Sci 23(2):43–47

  22. 22.

    Kadir RA (1998) The physical properties of Calamus scipionum and Daemonorops angustifolia at different ages and heights. Trop For Prod 4(2):153–158

  23. 23.

    Bhat KM, Mohamed Nasser KM, Thulasidas PK (1993) Anatomy and identification of south Indian rattans (Calamus species). IAWA 14(1):63–76

  24. 24.

    Cai ZM (1994) Anatomical characteristics of rattan stem and grouping of commercial rattans. Sci Silvae Sinicae 10(3):209–213

  25. 25.

    Lv WH, Jiang ZH, Wu YZ (2009) Basic components and chemical properties of the cane of Daemonorops margaritae. Sci Silvae Sinicae 45(7):96–100

  26. 26.

    Zhang SY (1997) Wood specific gravity–mechanical property relationship at species level. Wood Sci Technol 31(3):181–191

  27. 27.

    Yu HQ, Jiang ZH, Hse CY, Shupe TF (2008) Selected physical and mechanical properties of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens). J Trop For Sci 1:258–263

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the support of Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (2015BAD04B03) in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670565) in writing the manuscript.

Author information

SY analyzed the data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. XL performed the experiment. LS was another major contributor in writing the manuscript. XL participated in designing the experiment. GT and JM collected the samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Lili Shang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Xiang, E., Shang, L. et al. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of four rattan species grown in China. J Wood Sci 66, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-020-1850-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Rattan
  • Physical–mechanical properties
  • Calamus
  • Species