 Original article
 Open Access
 Published:
Effective lateral resistance of combined timber joints with nails and bolts
Journal of Wood Science volume 58, pages9–19(2012)
Abstract
An experimental study on combined steeltotimber joints with nails and bolts is conducted in this study. Principal results are as follows: The initial stiffness and effective allowable resistance of combined joints depend obviously on clearances in predrilled boltholes. The combined joints with nails and bolts have high potential of energy capacity to resist strong earthquake forces. There are upper limits of clearances in predrilled boltholes that allow advantages of considering the synthetic resistance of combined joints in practical structural design. Combining the joint components with appropriate design will give higher performance against strong earthquakes increasing the safety margin and energy capacity until the failure. The combined joints should be designed under the restrictions of particular specifications in closed design systems because the advantages of combining the joint components are influenced obviously by various actual conditions, which are too difficult to consider in detail in open design systems.
Introduction
Various mechanical fasteners are used in timber constructions alone or combined with other fasteners to resist loads and external forces. Timber joints with fasteners of each kind have their unique load–displacement characteristics, which make it difficult to evaluate the design resistance of combined joints with different kinds of fasteners by a common standard method. Considering this difficulty, the current Japanese standard for timber structures [1] does not allow summation of the allowable resistance of timber joints with different fasteners in common with most of the other codes or standards.
Some effective combination of different fasteners, however, may be a choice to improve the actual safety of timber constructions. The difficulty in determination of design allowable resistance by a standard method comes from inevitable initial large displacements of some fasteners due to loose contacts or clearances in predrilled holes and/or variation in ultimate displacement or ductility among various specifications of the joints with different fasteners. The design resistance, however, may be able to be evaluated when the combined joints are designed under the restriction of specifications in closed design and construction systems, which may give an advantage for designing the timber joints with high structural performance. Based on this background, the authors conducted an experimental study on combined steeltotimber joints with ordinary nails and bolts in this study.
Materials and methods
Lateral resistance tests were carried out on joints assembled with glulams of todomatsu (Abies sachalinensis) as a main member, fastened to two steel side plates by either a bolt or nails, or a combination of them. Thicknesses of main member (t), which were equal to effective bolt lengths, were 60, 90 and 120 mm, respectively. Bolts were of diameter (d _{b}) 10 mm. The steel side plates and all adopted bolts of steel grade SS400 [2], and common nails (CN50) [3] were utilized in making the test specimens. The SS400 steel products with thickness less than 16 mm are provided yield stress of not less than 245 N/mm^{2} and tensile strength of 400–510 N/mm^{2}. The CN50 nail was 2.87 mm in diameter and 50.8 mm in length, and the standard strength of its materials is 690 N/mm^{2}. Table 1 shows the basic properties of the specimens fabricated with moisture contents of between 10.6 and 11.5% (average of 11.1%).
Figure 1 shows the geometry of the specimen and its nomenclature. One bolt was adopted per a bolted joint and 16 nails, 8 nails in each side, were adopted per a nailed joint. The bolt and the nails were positioned according to the standard margins and spacing [1]. We prepared 18 joints only with nails (N), 18 joints only with bolts (B) and 18 combined joints (BN) with both nails and bolts. The nails were hammered moderately ensuring a slight gap and the bolts were only ‘handtightened’ to avoid initial friction between the steel plates and timber. The bolted joints had clearances in predrilled boltholes of 2 mm in the steel plates and 2 mm in the timber. The details of the combined joints were the same as the nailed or bolted joints. The joint specimens were fixed onto the testing machine as shown in Fig. 2 and thrust up and down by a hydraulic cylinder, capable of taking outputs up to 113 kN. A load cell, capable of taking measurements up to 100 kN, and two displacement transducers fixed on both sides of the specimens, capable of taking slip readings up to 50 mm, were used to measure load and displacements, respectively. The joint specimens were loaded under the displacement control system. Twentyseven specimens were tested monotonically until the joint completely failed and the other specimens were tested cyclically. Under the cyclic mode, loads were applied repetitively to the joints at 3 common slip levels (1, 2 and 3 mm) from overview of the monotonic loadslip curves of nailed, bolted and combined joints (see Fig. 3 shown later) and each level consisted of 2 cycles. At the end of the 2nd cycle of the 3rd slip level, the joints were loaded monotonically until complete failure.
Numerical simulation of design initial slips of bolted joints
A MonteCarlo simulation was conducted to estimate the design initial slips of the bolted joints with clearances in predrilled boltholes. Assuming a 5.0% singletailed normal distribution probability [4, 5], 1000 random combinations of initial locations of bolts in their predrilled holes of steel plates and wood members in the loading direction, which corresponded to initial slips, were generated with a standard deviation that made 95% of the random location distributed within the clearance 2 mm in the steel plate and the same clearance in the wood member [6–9]. The random numbers due to the normal distribution are often generated by the Box–Muller method and the method using central limit theorem [10]. In this, the central limit theorem was adopted to approximate the normal distribution and the random ratios of initial slips to the total clearances in predrilled boltholes were generated by the random function of Visual Basic, which distributed from 0 to 1 [11].
From the obtained distribution of random initial locations of the bolts, 5th percentile upper limit ratio of initial slips to the clearance was determined nonparametrically. The experimental loadslip curves of bolted joints were shifted to have the initial slips corresponded to this ratio.
Results and discussion
Figure 3 shows the monotonic loadslip curves of three specimens of each joint configuration. The envelope loadslip curves extracted from the data of the cyclic tests are discussed collectively with them hereafter, because the envelope loadslip curves in the cyclic tests were similar to those in the monotonic tests except slight increases of the slips in inelastic ranges and the maximum loads in the cyclic tests were rather a little higher than those in the monotonic tests in this study [12]. At all main member thickness, the nailed joints had similar loadslip curves with gradual nailpulloff and failed finally in nailheadtearoff [13] (Fig. 4). The maximum loads of the bolted joints increased as the main member thickness increased from 60 to 120 mm, which corresponded to main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio from 6 to 12, though the increase became smaller within the range from 9 to 12 in main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio. The ductility of the bolted joints kept on increasing above 90 mm, on the other hand [14]. This increase in ductility, which is directly related to energy capacity up to the final failure, gives an advantage against strong earthquake forces, though it is little considered in allowable stress design for any loads or forces.
The loadslip curves of the combined joints (Fig. 3c) had characteristic dropsingrooves (DIG), which showed transition phases of load bearing from only by nails to both by nails and bolts. These transitions are the results of inevitable initial slips of the bolts located in predrilled boltholes of greater diameter, which bring about a difficulty of evaluating the lateral resistance of combined joints. The loadslip behavior of the combined joints after reaching the maximum loads depends on the ductility of the joint components as can be seen in Fig. 3b and c. The ductility of timber joints is the result of detailed specifications of the joints and loading conditions, and then it cannot be determined uniquely to a kind of joint.
The general experimental results of the nailed, bolted and combined joints are shown in Table 2 [15]. An essential problem for designing combined joints is how to evaluate allowable upper limits of working resistance (allowable resistance) for practical use in open and/or closed structural design systems. Many criteria have been suggested to determine the allowable resistance of timber joints, some of which are adopted to the standard allowable resistance available for open use in current design codes, standards or recommendations [1, 15–18]. The principal criteria are (1) apparent yield loads determined in various ways, (2) loads at some allowable displacements to ensure serviceability or tolerable slight damage of structures, (3) loads derived from design maximum loads and the safety factor, and (4) loads determined to ensure the recommended ductility to conform to the basic assumption of earthquakeresistant design of timber constructions. These criteria are partially or entirely applied to timber joints considering actual conditions of loads and forces and expected structural performance in the regions where the structures are built.
Currently in Japan, the loads calculated by the criteria (1), (3) and (4) are mostly adopted to determine the standard allowable resistance of structural timber joints [1, 15] to ensure the required serviceability or tolerable slight damage for loads and forces assumed in allowable resistance design and the prevention of collapse against strong seismic forces assumed in ultimate resistance design. Table 2 shows the average experimental results and the standard shortterm allowable resistance of the nailed, bolted and combined joints, which includes the characteristic values shown in Fig. 5a determined by the criteria (1), (3) and (4). Although the bolted joints were assembled with clearances in predrilled boltholes, the steel side plates connected with handtightened bolts slipped downwards due to their own weight during specimen setup. Consequently, the loading of the bolted joints started with the bolts located at the bases of the main member predrilled boltholes and at the tops of the side member predrilled boltholes. This explains why the bolted joints tested here had no initial slips (Fig. 3b). To obtain the most conservative loadslip curves of the bolted joints, therefore, the experimental results of the bolted joints were modified with an initial slip of 4 mm, which corresponded to the total clearance in predrilled boltholes. Then, the loadslip curves of the combined joints were modified using the loadslip curves of the bolted joints with initial slips 0 and 4 mm, which were the lower and upper bounds of initial slips possible in actual joints. The characteristic values in Fig. 5a were recalculated for the modified loadslip curves and were listed in Table 3 [15].
Tables 2 and 3 indicate, however, that the combination of the criteria (1), (3) and (4) does not give adequate design shortterm allowable resistance of the combined joints.
As can be seen in the tables, the calculated yield loads of some combined joints are too low, even dropping into negatives (see superscript “a” in Tables 2 and 3), or some other values were greater than P _{max} (see superscript “b” in Tables 2 and 3). A principal reason for this error is the presence of DIG. Although the loadslip curves of the combined joints are continuous, they do not follow evenly crossing DIG, which renders suitable bilinear mapping difficult. One of the practical criteria to determine the design allowable resistance of combined joints is some allowable displacement (criterion (2)), which ensures serviceability or tolerable slight damage in actual conditions. This universal criterion in structural design allows mechanically reasonable summation of the loads beard by different fasteners of a combined joint at a displacement common to every fastener. The other essential elements that should be considered to ensure the ultimate resistance against strong earthquake forces are the safety factor (criterion (3)) and the recommended ductility (criterion (4)) [16]. These criteria are illustrated in Fig. 5b. The design allowable resistance of a combined joint is given as the lowest value among the loads determined by the criteria (2), (3) and (4).
To discuss the design allowable resistance of the combined joints quantitatively, we should first estimate the design initial slips for given clearances in predrilled boltholes. The simulated 5th percentile upper limit initial slips resulted in about 75% of the clearances in predrilled boltholes, which corresponded to 1.5 mm for the joints with 2.0 mm total clearances and 3.0 mm for the joints with 4.0 mm total clearances. From this simulated result, the loadslip curves of the bolted joints were remodified assuming the initial slips 0, 1.5 and 3.0 mm. Thereafter, the average loadslip curves of the nailed joints (Fig. 6a) and those of the bolted joints with the initial slips above (Fig. 6b) were synthesized into the loadslip curves of the combined joints (Fig. 6c).
Next, we have to determine the allowable joint slips. Some definite allowable slips have been considered as one of the principal criteria for determining the standard allowable resistance of various timber joints in the past. The allowable slips for various fasteners, however, are not specified in the design standards and are different from each other, which make the simple summation of the standard allowable resistance very difficult even though the fasteners are installed with no initial clearances. The joint slips at the standard allowable resistance of single joints, moreover, are often incompatible with the joint slips correspondent to the deformations of structural elements at the standard allowable resistance. For example, the slips of corner nails of shear walls at the standard allowable resistance vary approximately from 1 to 3 mm due to sizes or configurations of walls [19, 20], while the slips at the standard allowable resistance of single nailed joints are roughly 1.5 mm [21]. This incompatibility seems unavoidable for determining the standard allowable resistance of timber joints separately from actual loadslip curves of them in open design systems. Because we can hardly evaluate the joint slips at the practical allowable resistance of various structural elements under various loading conditions on a common basis. These discrepancies indicate the difficulty of determining the reasonable design allowable resistance of any combined joint in an open design system.
When we design combined joints in a closed design system, on the other hand, we can determine the allowable joint slips in a more reasonable way for particular joint arrangements under particular loading conditions. That is, the allowable slips can be determined to satisfy particular requirements in actual service conditions to avoid excessive deformation or unrecoverable damage of the structures. Though the major timber constructions are designed following the recognized design codes or standards for open use, reasonable closed design will also be helpful to make the structural design and development of timber constructions more flexible. If we focus on a braced wooden frame as a simple example, the total brace elongation, the sum of the pure brace elongation and the slips of both end joints, never exceeds the elongation corresponding to the allowable shear strain of the frame [16], which is determined to ensure the serviceability of the structures against wind or seismic forces in allowable resistance design. Because the pure elongation of the brace is usually much less than the joint slips, the slip of an end joint may be allowed to be around 40 or 45% (onehalf of 80 or 90%) to the allowable total elongation of the brace assembled with ordinary structural lumber and joints. If we consider an example of braced wooden frame of 2730 mm high and 1820 mm wide and assume the allowable pure shear strain 1/300 rad or 1/150 rad [16], the allowable total elongation of the brace results in 5.1 or 10.1 mm. The allowable slip of an end joint can be estimated as 2.0 mm (roundly 40% of 5.1 mm) or 4.0 mm (roundly 40% of 10.1 mm).
Table 4 shows the loads at the smaller allowable slips 2.0 mm (criterion (2)), the loads of 2/3 of the maximum loads (criterion (3)), and the loads that ensure the recommended ductility (criterion (4)) calculated from the experimental results of nailed, bolted and combined joints according to the definition shown in Fig. 5b, and Table 5 shows those loads calculated from the modified results of combined joints. The whole view of Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 gives the following discussion:

1.
The initial stiffness of the combined joints varies obviously depending on the clearances in predrilled boltholes.

2.
The reduction of the maximum resistance due to the clearances in predrilled boltholes depends on the ductility of the joint component that bears the loads from the beginning.

3.
The effective design shortterm allowable resistance of the combined joints varies obviously depending on the clearances in predrilled boltholes. The effective ratios of the design shortterm allowable resistance of the joints with 4.0 mm clearances in predrilled boltholes varied from 0.52 to 0.75 (0.62 in average) for the combination of criteria (2), (3) and (4) (Fig. 5b).

4.
The elastoplastic energy capacity or work until the failure depends on the ductility of the joint components of each kind. The effective ratios of the energy capacity or work of the combined joints to the simple summation of those of the nailed and bolted joints tested in this study varied from 0.90 to 1.17 under little influence of the clearances in predrilled boltholes. This result, however, is restricted to the joints having far greater ultimate slips in comparison with initial clearances.
The modified design shortterm allowable resistance of the combined joints with clearances in predrilled boltholes in Table 5 was determined by the criterion (2) (allowable slip) for the joints with main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio of 9 or 12, which had relatively higher ductility, and it was reduced by the criterion (4) (recommended ductility) for the joints with main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio of 6, which had relatively lower ductility. The principal criterion determining the design allowable resistance is naturally varied by the allowable slip, clearance in predrilled boltholes and ductility of constituent joints.
The actual design shortterm allowable resistance of the combined joints with main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio of 9 or 12 in Table 4 was determined by the criterion (2) and was smaller than that of the nailed joints. This contradiction comes from large standard deviation of the design shortterm allowable resistance determined by the criterion (2). The criterion (2) gives the design shortterm allowable resistance of combined joints in wide variation because of its natural dependency on random initial slips of bolted joints. Particularly if the initial slips vary crossing over the allowable slip, the lower limit evaluation calculated from all data including some specimens with smaller initial slips that give higher loads at the same allowable slip may result in lower design allowable resistance. It is because the existence of higher loads increases the standard deviation for the same minimum load and higher average load than the evaluation from the data excluding the higher values, which sometimes results in unreasonably low design allowable resistance. In these cases, the design allowable resistance of the combined joints should be determined to be equivalent to that of the nailed joints for the serviceability limit design.
The evaluated design shortterm allowable resistance of the combined joints with main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio of 9 was less than that of the bolted joints in Table 4, which were determined from the test results without any consideration to the reduction due to clearances in predrilled boltholes. For these clearances in predrilled boltholes, consideration for the synthetic resistance has no advantage in the current design procedure that obligates only conceptual but no quantitative consideration to the reduction in effective resistance due to inevitable clearances in predrilled boltholes. The relationship between the total clearance in predrilled boltholes and the resultant design shortterm allowable resistance of nailed, bolted and combined joints is shown in Fig. 7 for each main member thickness/bolt diameter ratio. Figure 7 indicates probable upper limits of clearances in predrilled boltholes for some joint arrangements or configurations allowing the advantage of considering the synthetic resistance of combined joints in the current design procedure. The discussion above only concerns with the evaluation of design allowable resistance or serviceability limit resistance following the current design procedure regardless of actual initial slips of bolted joints, which does not deny the following actual advantages of combined joints.

1.
Initial stiffness of bolted joints with clearances in predrilled boltholes used alone can be improved by combining with additional nailed or screwed joints that have no initial slips, or with glued joints.

2.
On the contrary, maximum resistance of nailed or screwed joints used alone can be improved by combining with additional bolted joints. Even if the clearances in predrilled boltholes of bolted joints hinder the obvious increase of the allowable resistance estimated following the current design standard, the actual maximum resistance or safety factors of them will increase if the nailed or screwed joints are designed appropriately to have far greater ultimate slips than probable initial slips of the bolted joints.

3.
The principal advantage of combined joints is the improvement of energy capacity or work until the failure in comparison with singleuse of the joint component that precedes bearing applied loads. The energy capacity of the combined joints designed effectively can be more than 90% to the simple summation of the energy capacity of both joint components loaded alone as the test result of this study shows.
The second and third advantages indicate that the combined joints designed effectively will have higher performance to survive under strong earthquakes, even though these advantages are considered less or almost nothing in evaluating allowable or serviceability limit resistance following the current design standard. The effective allowable resistance of combined joints with different kinds of fasteners is principally dependent on two components: ductility of joint components and characteristic initial slips of joint components.
This study only shows a kind of case study of the combined joints of particular configuration and the test results cannot be applied quantitatively to other configurations. The entire loadslip curves of the joint components, which characterize the resultant mechanical performance of the combined joints, vary in wide range due to many actual conditions; i.e. end and side margins, spacing, loading direction to the grain direction, length/diameter ratios of the fasteners, boundary conditions of the fastener heads and tips, and possible brittle behavior of a cluster of fasteners or an eccentric load distribution among the fasteners. Considering these elements, it is very difficult to propose a general design procedure of combined joints for open use. This fact confirms the validity of the current codes or standards that do not allow the summation of the allowable resistance of timber joints with different fasteners. It also indicates that careful considerations on the elements above must be required even when designing the combined joints of particular specifications for closed use.
Conclusions
The experimental study on combined steeltotimber joints with nails and bolts together with a MonteCarlo simulation of design initial slips of bolted joints gave the following conclusions.

1.
The simulated 5th percentile upper limit initial slips of bolted joints are about 75% of the clearances in predrilled boltholes.

2.
The initial stiffness of the combined joints depends obviously on the clearances in predrilled boltholes of the bolted joints.

3.
The effective maximum resistance of the combined joints depends on both the clearances in boltholes and the ductility of the joint component that bears the loads from the beginning.

4.
The principal advantage of combining the nailed and bolted joints is the high potential of energy capacity to resist strong earthquake forces.

5.
There are upper limits of clearances in boltholes that allow practical advantages of considering the synthetic resistance of combined joints. Combining the joint components even with larger clearances will still have the advantages in the increase of additional resistance beyond the design shortterm resistance and energy capacity until the failure.

6.
The advantages of combining the joint components, however, are influenced obviously by various actual conditions; i.e. end and side margins, spacing, loading direction to the grain direction, length/diameter ratios of the fasteners, boundary conditions of the fastener heads and tips, and possible brittle behavior of a cluster of fasteners or an eccentric load distribution among the fasteners. Practically, it is too difficult to consider the variation of loadslip characteristics of the joint components depending on these conditions in detail in open design systems. The combined joints, therefore, should be designed under the restrictions of particular specifications based on the experimental loadslip data or substitutive analyses in closed design systems, or they should be used as a failsafe jointsystem against strong earthquakes expecting no advantage in general allowable resistance design.
References
 1.
Architectural Institute of Japan (2006) Standard for structural design of timber structures (in Japanese). Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, pp 210–212, 239–242, 266–271, 367–369
 2.
Japanese Industrial Standard (2004) Rolled steel for general structure (in Japanese). JIS G 3101. Japanese Industrial Standard Association, Tokyo
 3.
Japanese Industrial Standard (2005) Records of nail explanation and description (in Japanese). JIS A 5508. Japanese Industrial Standard Association, Tokyo
 4.
George WS, William GC (1956) Statistical methods for biological science and agricultural experiments (in Japanese). Revised edition translated by Hatamura M, Okuno T, and Tsumura Y. Published by Iwanami publishers, under the arrangement with The Iowa University Press, Ames
 5.
Michael JC (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R (in Japanese). Translated by Nomaguchi K and Kikuchi Y, and published in Japan by Kyoritsu publishers under the arrangement with John Wiley and sons Ltd
 6.
Hirai T (1993) A Monte Carlo simulation of the effective lateral resistance of multiple bolted timber joints with lead hole clearances subjected to axial forces. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 39:1027–1035
 7.
Hirai T, Namura K, Yanaga K, Koizumi A, Tsujino T (2006) Lateral resistance of anchorbolt joints between timbersills and foundations II. Effective lateral resistance of multiple anchorbolt joints. J Wood Sci 52:115–120
 8.
Hirai T, Namura K, Kimura T, Tsujino T, Koizumi A (2006) Lateral resistance of anchorbolt joints between timber sills and foundations III. Numerical simulations of the effect of sill thickness on the effective lateral resistance of multiple anchorbolt joints. J Wood Sci 52:295–301
 9.
Hirai T, Ohtomo T, Wakashima Y (1998) Effective resistance of joints with multiple fastenings. In: Proceedings, 5th World conference on timber engineering, vol 2, pp 145–152
 10.
Dani G, Hedibert FL (2006) Markov chain Monte Carlo: stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. Chapman&Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, pp 9–20
 11.
Matsuda T (1999) Visual Basic 6.0. Gijutuhyouronsha, Tokyo, p 231
 12.
Karacabeyli E, Yasumura M, Foliente GC, Ceccotti A (2005) Background information on ISO standard 16670 for cyclic testing of connections. In: Proceedings of CIBW18 (A), 38151, pp 1–10
 13.
Hirai T, Ando Y, Ueda K (1991) Lateral resistances and fracture modes of nailed timber joints I (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:1157–1166
 14.
Kamachi K, Inayama M, Inoue M, Ando N (2008) Design method to estimate the loadslip characteristics of bolted joints with the steel side plates (in Japanese). J Struct Constr Eng 73:1599–1606
 15.
Japan 2X4 Home Builders Association (2002) Structural design guidelines for wood frame construction (in Japanese). Japan 2X4 Home Builders Association, Tokyo, pp 214–214, 233–241
 16.
Hirai T, Miyasawa K, Komatsu K (2009) Timber construction, 3rd edn. Toyo Publishers, Tokyo (in Japanese)
 17.
British standards (2002). Structural use of timber. Code of practice for permissible stress design, materials and workmanship. British standard institute (BS 52682:2002)
 18.
American Society for Testing Materials (1995) Standard test methods bolted connections in wood and woodbased products. ASTM D5652. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
 19.
Kamiya F, Hirashima Y, Hatayama Y, Kanaya N (1983) Studies on woodpanel construction (III) Evaluation of a shear wall by analytical method (in Japanese). Bull For & For Prod Res Inst 322:73–94
 20.
Hirai T, Zhang PW, Irie Y, Wakashima Y (1999) Lateral resistance of nailed timber joints with structural wooden panels (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 45:120–129
 21.
Architectural Institute of Japan (1973) Standard for structural design of timber structures (in Japanese). Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, pp 180–181
Author information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wanyama, O.G., Sawata, K., Hirai, T. et al. Effective lateral resistance of combined timber joints with nails and bolts. J Wood Sci 58, 9–19 (2012) doi:10.1007/s1008601112168
Received
Accepted
Published
Issue Date
DOI
Keywords
 Combined joint
 Allowable slip
 Allowable resistance
 Maximum resistance
 Energy capacity