Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

  • Review article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Cell death of long-lived ray parenchyma cells during heartwood formation in trees

Abstract

Cell death plays an important role in the determination of secondary xylem cell functions. Tracheary elements (TEs), such as vessel elements and tracheids, lose their organelles due to rapid autolysis after the completion of secondary wall thickening and lignification, and play an important role in water movement along the stem. In contrast, xylem axial and ray parenchyma cells (xylem parenchyma cells) remain alive for several years or longer and retain their organelles even after maturation. As a result, xylem parenchyma cells play important roles in nutrient storage, axial and radial transportation of materials, and defense responses in the stem. In addition, they are involved in the formation of heartwood, which contributes to increases in the resistance of the tree trunk to decay, as they synthesize heartwood components such as polyphenols prior to their death. The present review focuses on changes in long-lived ray parenchyma cells during heartwood formation, such as morphology and contents of organelles, gene expression, and survival rate in sapwood. This review also summarizes the differences in cell death characteristics between TEs and ray parenchyma cells. The elucidation of the cell death mechanism of ray parenchyma cells is expected to provide useful information for controlling the properties of heartwood.

Introduction

Trees have a well-developed vascular cambium and continue radial growth of the stem over time [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The periclinal division of cambial cells leads to radial growth, producing secondary phloem cells outside and secondary xylem cells inside the cambium. The cambium produces substantially more secondary xylem cells than secondary phloem cells. Therefore, woody biomass, an important renewable and carbon–neutral resource, is primarily composed of secondary xylem cells.

Cell death plays an important role in the determination of secondary xylem cell functions. The differentiation of secondary xylem cells involves cell expansion or elongation, cell wall thickening (secondary wall thickening), the formation of modified structures such as pits and perforations, lignification, and cell death [4,5,6]. The process of differentiation is highly similar among secondary xylem cells with various functions, but the timing of cell death differs significantly. Tracheary elements (TEs), such as tracheids and vessel elements, lose their organelles due to rapid autolysis after the completion of secondary wall thickening and lignification and play an important role in water movement. In contrast, xylem axial and ray parenchyma cells (xylem parenchyma cells) remain alive for several years or longer. Even after maturation, i.e., secondary wall thickening and lignification, they retain their organelles and remain viable [4,5,6]. Xylem parenchyma cells form three-dimensional lattices in secondary xylem and they are connected by symplasmic networks in sapwood [9,10,11]. As a result, these cells play important roles in nutrient storage, axial and radial transportation of materials, and defense responses in the stem [1, 10, 12,13,14,15]. In addition, xylem parenchyma cells are involved in the formation of heartwood (Fig. 1), which contributes to the resistance of the tree trunk to decay, as they synthesize heartwood substances such as polyphenols prior to their death [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The elucidation of the cell death mechanism of xylem parenchyma cells is expected to provide useful information for controlling the properties of heartwood. This review introduces the cell death characteristics of long-lived xylem parenchyma cells and compares the regulatory mechanisms of cell death between xylem parenchyma cells and short-lived xylem cells, such as TEs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cross section of a tree trunk of Juglans mandshurica var. sachalinensis. Ca cambium, HW heartwood, Ph phloem, SW sapwood, Xy xylem. Scale bar = 5 cm

Cell death of short-lived xylem cells

The cell death process of xylem cells has been mostly researched in short-lived TEs of herbaceous angiosperms, such as Zinnia elegans [24,25,26,27], and ample information about the cellular and molecular cell death mechanisms has been accumulated. In vitro, single mesophyll cells isolated from Z. elegans leaves transdifferentiated synchronously into TEs within 72 h in the presence of two plant hormones, auxin and cytokinin [25, 28]. Therefore, cell death of these TEs is thought to be a time-dependent programmed cell death (PCD). During the early stages of TE differentiation, brassinosteroid phytohormones induce the expression of genes involved in secondary wall formation and PCD [29]. Then, nucleases [30,31,32,33,34] and proteases [31, 35,36,37] accumulate in the vacuole. Autolysis of the cell organelles begins simultaneously as the accumulated autolytic enzymes are released into the cytoplasm, triggered by the collapse of the vacuole, which begins to be observed six hours after secondary wall formation [38]. Groover et al. [38] reported that nuclear DNA is fragmented during PCD in TEs. Similarly, we have observed nuclear DNA fragmentation during cell death in short-lived ray tracheids in Pinus densiflora (Fig. 2) [39, 40]. Autolysis after vacuolar collapse reportedly proceeds quickly, with nucleic acid degradation completed within 10–20 min [41]. Regarding the mechanism of vacuolar collapse, Groover and Jones [42] reported that it involves calcium ion influx into the cell, and Kuriyama [43] reported that changes in the permeability of organic anions in the vacuolar membrane cause vacuolar collapse. However, the detailed molecular mechanism has not been clarified.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay of tissue near the cambium (ac) and differentiating ray tracheids (df) to detect nuclear DNA fragmentation in Pinus densiflora. The left panels show TUNEL fluorescence, the middle panels show propidium iodide fluorescence, and the right panels are differential interference contrast images. Arrows indicate nuclei with DNA fragmentation in ray tracheids. Arrowheads indicate nuclei without DNA fragmentation. The left side of the micrographs corresponds to the outer side of the tree. RP ray parenchyma cell, RT ray tracheid. Scale bars = 30 μm. Figures adapted from Nakaba et al. [39]

The detailed molecular PCD mechanisms in TEs have been elucidated in studies using Arabidopsis thaliana. The NAC domain transcription factors Vascular-related NAC-domain6 (VND6) and VND7 regulate the expression of genes involved in secondary wall formation and PCD of TEs and are master transcription factors for TE differentiation [44]. In addition to transcriptome analysis results, results from drug treatment experiments, such as the inhibition of both secondary wall formation and cell death by trypsin inhibitors [42], suggest that secondary wall formation and PCD progress in a coordinated manner during TE differentiation. The papain-like cysteine proteases xylem cysteine peptidase1 (XCP1) and XCP2 [45, 46], a cysteine protease involved in vacuolar protein maturation termed vacuolar processing enzyme (VPE) [47, 48], metacaspase9 (AtMC9), a type of metacaspase, a cysteine protease with a similar structure to caspases that play a central role in PCD in animals [49,50,51], and the nucleolytic enzyme bifunctional nuclease1 (BFN1) [52, 53] are involved in the PCD of TEs.

In wood fibers of Populus, nuclear DNA fragmentation and autophagosome-mediated autolysis of cellular contents occur prior to vacuolar rupture [54]. The life duration of wood fibers is approximately one month [55]. Gene expression of XCP2, VPE, and metacaspases, which are also involved in the PCD of TEs, increases during the cell death process in wood fibers in Populus tremula × tremuloides [51, 54, 56, 57]. Despite the common gene expression patterns, the differences in the autolysis process suggest that the cell death mechanisms differ between wood fibers and TEs.

For details on the cell death of TEs and wood fibers, which are short-lived xylem cells, refer to the reviews by Fukuda [24, 25], Bollhöner et al. [55], and Escamez and Tuominen [58].

Cell death of long-lived ray parenchyma cells

Xylem parenchyma cells play important roles in the storage and transport of materials for many years, after which they execute cell death processes and lose their organelles via autolysis. According to the International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA), the inner layers of wood, which contain no living cells, are defined as heartwood, whereas the outer layers containing living cells are termed sapwood [59]. The innermost part of the sapwood, which is intermediate between sapwood and heartwood in terms of color and other general characteristics, is termed intermediate wood [59]. It is important to note that regions with these characteristics are sometimes referred to as “transition zone” or “white zone”, which are defined differently by different researchers. Hillis [18] referred to the narrower of these regions as “transition zone” and the wider as “intermediate wood”. Nobuchi and Harada [60] referred to the area of the inner sapwood that appears white to the naked eyes in green condition as “white zone”, while the narrower, slightly colored area between white zone and heartwood was referred to as “transition zone”. In this review, we use the term “intermediate wood”, and provide explanations of terms when authors clearly defined the terms in their articles. To avoid confusion, we recommend authors to mention the definitions of sapwood, intermediate wood, and heartwood in each article, e.g., Nakada and Fukatsu [61].

Before the death of xylem parenchyma cells, they synthesize heartwood substances as a result of metabolic changes. These heartwood substances, which play important roles in the resistance to decay, are released from xylem parenchyma cells and diffused into surrounding tissues [62]. Heartwood color, odor, and durability are important parameters for wood utilization, and the mechanism of heartwood formation has long been of interest [18]. Understanding the process of cell death during the transition from sapwood to heartwood is important for understanding the mechanisms of cell death of xylem parenchyma cells. Cambial cells and their derivatives have been suggested to provide a suitable model system for in situ studies of cytodifferentiation in secondary tissues because their differentiation can be followed in a radial direction [63,64,65,66,67,68]. In xylem parenchyma, axial parenchyma cells are sporadically distributed in the radial direction, whereas ray parenchyma cells are continuously arranged in the radial direction, allowing analysis of continuous changes to some extent. Therefore, ray parenchyma cells have been used to analyze changes from the start of differentiation to the death of xylem parenchyma cells. Hereafter, we first introduce the morphology of ray parenchyma cells and then the changes in cell contents and morphology related to their death.

Morphology of ray parenchyma cells and structure of rays

The long-lived ray parenchyma cells are unique to trees and are arranged radially, forming rays. The structure of the rays differs between conifers and broad-leaved trees [69, 70]. In conifers, they generally exist of a single row of cells in the axial direction (uniseriate ray) when viewed in the tangential section [69], and ray parenchyma cells are long and strip-shaped in the radial direction. Ray parenchyma cells are directly connected with adjacent longitudinal tracheids via cross-field pits. There are two types of coniferous trees: those in which the rays consist of ray parenchyma cells alone and those in which the rays consist of ray parenchyma cells and ray tracheids. Ray tracheids are generally located at the upper and lower ends of rays and undergo cell death quickly after the completion of secondary wall formation [71, 72]. Due to differences in cell wall organization, pit structure and distribution of lignin, ray parenchyma cells in conifers were classified into five types, namely, Sciadopitys, Cryptomeria, Diploxylon, Haploxylon, and Abies types [73]. According to cell wall organization, ray parenchyma cells can be divided into two types: those composed of primary walls alone (Sciadopitys type and Cryptomeria type) and those composed of primary and secondary walls (Diploxylon, Haploxylon, and Abies types). Among the species in which ray parenchyma cells form only a primary wall, there are two types: those in which cell wall thickening and lignification occur in the outermost sapwood (Cryptomeria type) and those in which lignification occurs in intermediate wood (Sciadopitys type) [73]. In Pinus species, ray parenchyma cells form primary and secondary walls and can be classified into three types based on their maturation process: (1) secondary wall thickening and lignification occur in the outermost sapwood, (2) secondary wall thickening and lignification occur in intermediate wood, and (3) lignification occurs without secondary wall thickening in intermediate wood [74]. Furthermore, in Pinus species, ray parenchyma cells with different types of maturation coexist in the same ray [74].

In contrast, broad-leaved trees show considerable variation in the shape of ray parenchyma cells and the aggregation state of ray parenchyma cells within a ray [69]. Rays in broad-leaved trees consist of parenchyma cells alone and do not form ray tracheids as in conifers. In the tangential section of rays, there are single-row rays (uniseriate ray), two-row rays (biseriate ray) and multi-row rays (multiseriate ray). Among multiseriate rays, those with significantly greater height and width are termed broad rays. Based on the shape of the radial view, ray parenchyma cells are classified into three types: procumbent cells, square cells and upright cells. When a ray is composed of procumbent cells alone, it is termed homogeneous rays, and when it is partially or completely composed of upright or square cells, it is termed heterogeneous rays. In uniseriate and biseriate rays, ray parenchyma cells are divided into three types based on their contacts with axial xylem elements: contact cells, intermediate cells and isolation cells [75]. Contact cells are located predominantly within the upper and lower lines of individual rays and connect with adjacent vessel elements through pits. Intermediate cells are located within the same radial cell lines as contact cells but are not adjacent to vessel elements. Isolation cells are located within the other radial cell lines of a given ray. Even when isolation cells are adjacent to vessel elements, they are not directly connected with vessel elements through pits. In addition, ray parenchyma cells situated inside multiseriate rays which due to their position do not touch any vessels, are termed as inner cells [76]. Although studies on the differences in the timing of secondary wall thickening and lignification in ray parenchyma cells in broad-leaved trees are few, it has been reported that in Populus which have only uniseriate rays, secondary wall thickening occurs earlier in contact cells and intermediate cells than in isolation cells [75].

Considering these differences among various types of ray parenchyma cells is important for understanding the cell death mechanisms of ray parenchyma cells. However, limited information is available about the relationship between types of ray parenchyma cells and characteristics of the death of ray parenchyma cells. Further studies considering differences among various types of ray parenchyma cells are needed for understanding their mechanism of cell death in detail.

Changes in contents and morphology of nuclei in ray parenchyma cells

Changes in the nuclei are easy to detect because the nuclei are relatively large organelles. Therefore, nuclear changes have been observed as indicators of changes in ray parenchyma cells within sapwood. In ray parenchyma cells in intermediate wood, nuclei are smaller and have higher DNA contents than those in outer sapwood [77].

The morphological changes in nuclei in the radial direction differ between conifers and broad-leaved trees. In conifers, nuclei are spherical in ray cambial cells, become rod-shaped or ellipsoid as ray parenchyma cells elongate, and undergo condensation and disappear at the boundary between sapwood and heartwood [78, 79]. In contrast, in broad-leaved trees, nuclei are spherical in ray cambial cells, take on a spindle shape during differentiation, and finally condensate and disappear at the boundary between sapwood and heartwood after changing their morphology to spherical again [78,79,80]. To quantitatively evaluate these morphological changes, the nuclear slenderness ratio [78, 79, 81, 82], nuclear irregularity index [83], and nuclear elongation index [84] have been proposed. Morphological changes in nuclei in intermediate wood can be used as an indicator of the progression of cell death in ray parenchyma cells because they correlate with cell death progression [85].

Nakada and Fukatsu [61] reported that the death of ray parenchyma cells in Larix kaempferi in Japan occurred from April to July based on a comparison of the locations of intermediate wood (i.e., the zone with a white color in the green condition) and nuclear disappearance. Yamamoto [74] noted that the death of ray parenchyma cells in several Pinus species in Japan occurred throughout the growing season, especially from July to October, based on methyl green pyronin staining and morphological analyses of the nuclei. In Taiwan, Yang [83] observed that the greatest changes in nuclear morphology in Pinus banksiana, Picea mariana and Populus tremuloides occurred in August, July–August, and August–October, respectively. Yang [83] concluded that heartwood formation within the stem started at the same time. We have observed significantly deformed nuclei in ray parenchyma cells in Abies sachalinensis from July to November in Japan (data not shown), and we speculate that cell death occurs at the same time. Although the evaluation methods differed among the previous reports, it can be assumed that the death of ray parenchyma cells occurs from spring to autumn.

Changes in other organelles and contents in ray parenchyma cells

Changes in organelles other than the nucleus have been revealed by transmission electron microscopy and other microscopic techniques, mainly in conifers such as Cryptomeria japonica (Fig. 3). In the outermost sapwood, abundant organelles such as mitochondria, the Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, plastids, ribosomes, and amyloplasts exist (Fig. 3) [86,87,88]. Mitochondria and ribosomes are abundantly observed during the growth period, when ray parenchyma cells have high physiological activity, such as respiration and protein biosynthesis. In the inner sapwood (authors referred to relatively inner part of sapwood which located outside of intermediate wood as “inner sapwood”), the numbers of these organelles decrease [87]. In intermediate wood, ray parenchyma cells become markedly vacuolated, pressing the organelles against the periphery of the cells (Fig. 3) [87]. Osmiophilic substances, thought to be waste products, accumulate in the large vacuoles and the cytoplasm shows osmiophilic properties [62, 88]. Nobuchi and Harada [62] pointed out that vacuoles might act as autophagosomes involved in autolysis in the inner part of intermediate wood (authors used “white zone”, and referred to the regions with a white color in the green condition as white zone) in Cryptomeria japonica. We have observed the timing of vacuolar rupture and morphological changes and nuclear disappearance during the death of ray parenchyma cells and found that the first change in vacuoles might be a dramatic decrease in storage proteins in protein-storage vacuoles. In ray parenchyma cells in intermediate wood (the regions with a white color in the green condition), not all vacuoles rupture at the same time even within the same cell, and the rupture of enlarged vacuoles might result in autolysis of the cellular contents in ray parenchyma cells in the outermost part of heartwood (Fig. 3) [89]. These observations indicate that vacuoles play an important role in the process of the death of ray parenchyma cells. Finally, ray parenchyma cells in heartwood contain no organelles or starch grains as storage materials, although residues of organelles and cytoplasmic substrates can be observed (Fig. 3) [62, 88]. These observations suggest that an efficient nutrient recycling system exists during the process of ray parenchyma cell death, in which autophagy might play an important role.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic diagram of the changes that occur in organelles during cell death of ray parenchyma cells in Cryptomeria japonica. In the outermost sapwood, there are abundant organelles. In the inner sapwood, the number of these organelles decreases. In intermediate wood, ray parenchyma cells become markedly vacuolated, and the amount of storage proteins in protein-storage vacuoles dramatically decrease. In heartwood, there are no organelles or starch grains as storage materials

Changes in the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells in the radial direction

Not all ray parenchyma cells in sapwood dies simultaneously. Early death in some ray parenchyma cells has been reported. In conifers that do not form ray tracheids in rays, such as Cryptomeria japonica and Abies sachalinensis, cell death occurs earlier in ray parenchyma cells located in the upper and lower radial lines of a ray than in other radial lines (Fig. 4) [88, 90, 91]. In conifers that form ray tracheids in rays, such as Pseudotsuga menziesii, Picea abies, Pinus densiflora and Pinus banksiana, cell death occurs earlier in ray parenchyma cells that are in contact with ray tracheids than in those not in contact with ray tracheids [71, 83, 91,92,93]. As mentioned above, in uniseriate and biseriate rays in broad-leaved trees, ray parenchyma cells are of three types designated contact cells, intermediate cells, and isolation cells, which differ in terms of their contacts with axial xylem elements [75]. We compared the timing of cell death of these three types of ray parenchyma cells in hybrid poplar (Populus sieboldii × P. grandidentata) and found that cell death occurs earliest in contact cells, then in intermediate cells, and finally in isolation cells [75]. The timings of secondary wall thickening and lignification differ between ray parenchyma cells that die earlier and other ray parenchyma cells [68, 71, 74, 75, 90]. In addition, the amounts of starch grains, lipids, storage proteins, and heartwood substances differ between ray parenchyma cells that die earlier and the other ray parenchyma cells [71, 75, 90]. These observations indicate that positional information might be an important factor in the regulation of the timing of cell death, differentiation, and the function of ray parenchyma cells in conifers and broad-leaved trees that form uniseriate rays.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Early death of ray parenchyma cells located in upper and lower cell lines of rays in Abies sachalinensis. a Light micrograph of a radial section, stained with acetocarmine, showing nuclei (arrows) in the ray parenchyma cells of the 10th annual ring from the cambium. The left side of the micrograph corresponds to the outer side of the stem. RP, ray parenchyma cell; T, tracheid. Scale bar = 50 μm. b Survival rates of ray parenchyma cells in August, determined from the current year’s annual ring to the annual ring in which all ray parenchyma cells had lost their organelles. Each rate was calculated as the percentage of ray parenchyma cells that contained a nucleus among 100 ray parenchyma cells. a Adapted from Nakaba et al. [90]

The location where the death of ray parenchyma cells starts within sapwood and the percentage of ray parenchyma cells that die earlier differ among species. The concept of survival rate of ray parenchyma cells presented by Ziegler [94] is useful in evaluating such differences among species. Nobuchi et al. [91] calculated the survival rates of ray parenchyma cells in 20 conifer species and found three survival rate decline types: (1) all ray parenchyma cells from cambium to the sapwood-heartwood boundary are alive, (2) the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells starts to decline from the middle sapwood, and (3) the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells starts to decline from the outer sapwood. In addition, Nobuchi et al. [95] reported the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells in 26 broad-leaved tree species and showed that most ray parenchyma cells from the cambium to the sapwood-heartwood boundary are alive and that it is rare for a tree species to have ray parenchyma cells that start to die from outside the sapwood-heartwood boundary. However, Nobuchi et al. [95] considered only procumbent cells, not upright and square cells, in calculating these survival rates. Spicer and Holbrook [93] showed that ray parenchyma cells retained their nuclei until these abruptly disappeared at the sapwood-heartwood boundary in three broad-leaved tree species, Acer rubrum, Fraxinus americana and Quercus rubra. These results indicate that, in broad-leaved trees, the differences in the radial decline trends of the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells among species are small, whereas in conifers, the location within the sapwood where cell death initiates may vary from species to species. It remains unclear why the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells varies among species.

It is expected that the physiological activity of ray parenchyma cells decreases from the outer sapwood towards sapwood-heartwood boundary because the numbers of organelles decrease in the inner sapwood [62, 88]. This expectation is consistent with the drastic decreases in the amount of RNA, which reflects cellular metabolic activity [96], and the mitochondrial reduction capacity, which reflects respiratory activity [78] in the outer sapwood. Radial trends in respiratory activity (oxygen consumption) have been reported, but results were rather inconsistent, ranging from a decrease [97,98,99,100,101,102] to no change [103] or even an increase [103, 104] in respiratory activity in intermediate wood compared to outer sapwood. However, as mentioned above, the survival rate of xylem parenchyma cells decreases towards the heartwood; therefore, the survival rate should be considered in evaluating radial variation in the respiratory activity of xylem parenchyma cells in sapwood. Spicer and Holbrook [93] evaluated the respiratory activity, which was corrected based on the area fraction, and survival rate of xylem parenchyma cells in outer and inner sapwood. In Tsuga canadensis, the respiration rate was lower in the inner sapwood than in the outer sapwood before correction, but after correction, the rates were similar [93]. Although results may vary among species, it is important to consider the survival rate when evaluating physiological activities, such as the respiratory activity, in xylem parenchyma cells, particularly for conifers.

Comparison of disappearance pattern of nuclei between tracheids and ray parenchyma cells

Ray parenchyma cells survive for many years after the completion of secondary wall thickening and lignification. In contrast, cell death of TEs occurs immediately after the completion of secondary wall formation. The cell death program in TEs is tightly coupled with secondary wall formation [25]. These features suggest that the cell death mechanism in ray parenchyma cells might differ from that of PCD in TEs. Therefore, we compared the distribution of cell death (disappearance of nuclei) between short-lived tracheids and long-lived ray parenchyma cells in secondary xylem of conifers and found that the cell death pattern of ray parenchyma cells differs from that of tracheids. In longitudinal and ray tracheids, cell death occurs successively in a radial direction and is related to the radial distance from the cambium (Fig. 5a) [71, 72, 90]. In other words, cell death of tracheids occurs in order from the pith side to the bark side in a radial direction. These results indicate that the length of time from the start of differentiation might control the timing of cell death of tracheids. This scenario resembles the time-dependent PCD of TEs in cultured Z. elegans cells [24, 25, 28]. In contrast, in ray parenchyma cells, successive cell death does not occur even within a given radial cell line of a ray (Fig. 5b) [71, 90]. These results indicate that the process of cell death of ray parenchyma cells might not be fully explained by the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cell death that have been proposed for short-lived TEs [25].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of nuclear disappearance patterns between tracheids and ray parenchyma cells in Abies sachalinensis. a, b Light micrographs of radial sections, stained with acetocarmine, showing nuclei in differentiating tracheids near the cambium (a) and ray parenchyma cells of the 10th annual ring from the cambium (b). Arrows indicates nuclei. Arrowhead indicates a dead ray parenchyma cell. The left side of the micrographs corresponds to the outer side of the stem. Ca cambium, RP ray parenchyma cell, T tracheid. Scale bars = 50 μm. a Adapted from Nakaba et al. [90] and b adapted from Funada et al. [6]

Molecular mechanisms of cell death of ray parenchyma cells

The molecular mechanisms regulating the death of ray parenchyma cells have not been fully unraveled. Comprehensive gene expression analyses to elucidate the mechanism of heartwood formation have revealed increased expression of nucleases, proteases, transcription factors, cytoskeleton-associated protein, and desiccation-related protein [105,106,107,108,109]. Huang et al. [110] reported that the KNAT3-like homeobox transcription factor involved in cell specialization and patterning was highly expressed in inner sapwood and intermediate wood (authors used “transition zone”, and referred to regions which fluoresce blue under UV light as transition zone) of black walnut (Juglans nigra). Using real-time PCR analysis, Moshchenskaya et al. [111] showed that BFN gene expression was increased in the intermediate wood (authors used “transition zone”, and referred to two growth rings at the border with heartwood as transition zone) compared to the inner sapwood in Pinus sylvestris. We have assessed the variation in the radial direction of gene expression of the transcription factors NAC and MYB, which are associated with secondary wall formation and PCD in short-lived xylem cells, and XCP, a cell death marker in TEs, in hybrid poplar (Populus tremula × P. alba) ray parenchyma cells using real-time PCR analysis [112]. We found that these genes continued to be expressed in the sapwood and that their expression did not increase prior to cell death [112]. It remains unclear where the products of the above genes are localized in xylem parenchyma cells and how the cell death process proceeds. Further studies on the localization of autolytic enzymes and functional gene analyses are needed in the future.

Gene functions that may be related with the death of ray parenchyma cells are difficult to analyze in trees because it takes several years or more for heartwood formation to initiate in individual trees, which hinders a good understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cell death in ray parenchyma cells. We believe that model experiments inducing cell death with secondary metabolism similar to heartwood formation would be useful to achieve a breakthrough in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cell death in ray parenchyma cells. We have been conducting cytological analyses of cell death accompanied with secondary metabolism in ray parenchyma cells using an artificial cell-death-induction system [113]. In this system, established by Imai and Nomura [114], cell death and the biosynthesis of agatharesinol, a heartwood substance, are induced in small sapwood sticks under high-humidity conditions. Such model experimental systems are expected to be useful in the functional analysis of cell death-related genes. Combining the results of cell death analyses in intact ray parenchyma cells with those obtained using the cell-death-induction system will greatly advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cell death in ray parenchyma cells.

Conclusions

Elucidating the mechanism of cell death in ray parenchyma cells is important for understanding the mechanism of heartwood formation, which is a unique phenomenon in trees with a large stem and long life. The process of cell death in long-lived ray parenchyma cells differs from that in short-lived xylem cells such as TEs, and is likely to differ in terms of the regulatory mechanisms as well. In particular, the existence of an interval of several years to several decades between the completion of secondary wall formation and cell death must be an important feature in explaining the regulatory mechanism of cell death in ray parenchyma cells (Fig. 6). As ray parenchyma cells are unique to trees, elucidating their cell death-regulatory mechanism might lead to a better understanding of the cell death mechanism unique to trees.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Schematic diagram of cell death in short-lived ray tracheids (a tracheary element) and long-lived ray parenchyma cells in conifers. Ray tracheid: autolysis occurs immediately after completion of secondary wall formation. The length of time from the start of differentiation might control the timing of cell death. Ray parenchyma cell: autolysis occurs after several years or more after the completion of secondary wall formation. In addition, positional information might affect the timing of differentiation and cell death. The death of ray parenchyma cells in broad-leaved trees has similar characteristics to that in conifers

As discussed in this review, numerous cytological studies on cell death of ray parenchyma cells during heartwood formation have been conducted. It has been shown that morphological changes occur in the nuclei in sapwood, other organelles decrease in numbers from outer sapwood to intermediate wood, and the survival rates of ray parenchyma cells in the radial direction differs among species. Furthermore, their positional information might affect the timing of differentiation and the death of ray parenchyma cells (Fig. 6). However, the regulatory mechanism of cell death in ray parenchyma cells has not yet been elucidated. Further studies considering differences among various types of ray parenchyma cells are needed for understanding their mechanism of cell death in detail. In addition, in order to understand the mechanism of cell death in ray parenchyma cells, it is essential to elucidate not only the morphological changes throughout the process, but also the molecular mechanisms, such as changes in the expression patterns of cell death-related genes and their products. We believe that further cellular and molecular biological studies combining analysis of intact ray parenchyma cells with cell-death-induction model experiments will provide new insights into the mechanism of heartwood formation, which remains largely unknown. In particular, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms will provide important evidence for the identification of cell death triggers, as it will help determine when and where cell death begins. Furthermore, a detailed molecular mechanism will allow a clear discussion of the relationship between cell death and the biosynthesis of heartwood substances.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BFN:

Bifunctional nuclease

MC:

Metacaspase

IAWA:

International Association of Wood Anatomists

PCD:

Programmed cell death

TE:

Tracheary element

VND:

Vascular-related NAC-domain

VPE:

Vacuolar processing enzyme

XCP:

Xylem cysteine peptidase

References

  1. Catesson AM (1990) Cambial cytology and biochemistry. In: Iqbal M (ed) The vascular cambium. Research Studies Press, Taunton, pp 63–112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larson PR (1994) The vascular cambium: development and structure. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaffey N (1999) Cambium: old challenges—new opportunities. Trees 13:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Funada R (2000) Control of wood structure. In: Nick P (ed) Plant microtubules: potential for biotechnology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22300-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Funada R (2008) Microtubules and the control of wood formation. In: Nick P (ed) Plant microtubules: development and flexibility. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 83–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/7089_2008_163

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Funada R, Yamagishi Y, Begum S, Kudo K, Nabeshima E, Nugroho WD, Oribe Y, Nakaba S (2016) Xylogenesis in trees: from cambial cell division to cell death. In: Funada R, Singh A, Kim YS (eds) Secondary xylem biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802185-9.00002-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Begum S, Nakaba S, Yamagishi Y, Oribe Y, Funada R (2013) Regulation of cambial activity in relation to environmental condition: understanding the role of temperature in wood formation of trees. Physiol Plant 147:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01663.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Begum S, Kudo K, Rahman MH, Nakaba S, Yamagishi Y, Nabeshima E, Nugroho WD, Oribe Y, Kitin P, Jin HO, Funada R (2018) Climate change and the regulation of wood formation by temperature. Trees 32:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1587-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sokołowska K (2013) Symplasmic transport in wood: the importance of living xylem cells. In: Sokołowska K, Sowiński P (eds) Symplasmic transport in vascular plants. Springer, New York, pp 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7765-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Spicer R (2014) Symplasmic networks in secondary vascular tissues: parenchyma distribution and activity supporting long-distance transport. J Exp Bot 65:1829–1848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Słupianek A, Dolzblasz A, Sokołowska K (2021) Xylem parenchyma—role and relevance in wood functioning in trees. Plants 10:1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaffey N, Barlow P (2001) The cytoskeleton facilitates a three-dimensional symplasmic continuum in the long-lived ray and axial parenchyma cells of angiosperm trees. Planta 213:811–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250100560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauter JJ (2000) Photosynthate allocation to the vascular cambium: facts and problems. In: Savidge R, Barnett J, Napier R (eds) Cell and molecular biology of wood formation. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris H, Brodersen CR, Schwarze FWMR, Jansen S (2016) The parenchyma of secondary xylem and its critical role in tree defense against fungal decay in relation to the CODIT model. Front Plant Sci 7:1665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris H, Hietala AM, Jansen S, Ribera J, Rosner S, Salmeia KA, Schwarze FWMR (2022) Using the CODIT model to explain secondary metabolites of xylem in defence systems of temperate trees against decay fungi. Ann Bot 125:701–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bamber RK (1976) Heartwood, its function and formation. Wood Sci Technol 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bamber RK, Fukazawa K (1985) Sapwood and heartwood: a review. For Abstr 46:567–580

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hillis WE (1987) Heartwood and tree exudates. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Magel EA, Hillinger C, Höll W, Ziegler H (1997) Biochemistry and physiology of heartwood formation: role of reserve substances. In: Rennenberg H, Eschrich W, Ziegler H (eds) Trees—contributions to modern tree physiology. SFB Academic Publisher, The Hague, pp 477–506

    Google Scholar 

  20. Magel EA (2000) Biochemistry and physiology of heartwood formation. In: Savidge R, Barnett J, Napier R (eds) Cell and molecular biology of wood formation. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 363–376

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor A, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ (2002) Heartwood formation and natural durability—a review. Wood Fiber Sci 34:587–611

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Spicer R (2005) Senescence in secondary xylem: heartwood formation as an active developmental program. In: Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (eds) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088457-5/50024-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kampe A, Magel EA (2013) New insights into heartwood and heartwood formation. In: Fromm J (ed) Cellular aspects of wood formation, plant cell monographs 20. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36491-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Fukuda H (1997) Tracheary element differentiation. Plant Cell 9:1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.7.1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fukuda H (2004) Signals that control plant vascular cell differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:379–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fukuda H (2016) Signaling, transcriptional regulation, and asynchronous pattern formation governing plant xylem development. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B 92:98–106. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.92.98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Iakimova ET, Woltering EJ (2017) Xylogenesis in zinnia (Zinnia elegans) cell cultures: unravelling the regulatory steps in a complex developmental programmed cell death event. Planta 245:681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2656-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukuda H, Komamine A (1980) Establishment of an experimental system for the study of tracheary element differentiation from single cells isolated from the mesophyll of Zinnia elegans. Plant Physiol 65:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.65.1.57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamamoto R, Demura T, Fukuda H (1997) Brassinosteroids induce entry into the final stage of tracheary element differentiation in cultured Zinnia cells. Plant Cell Physiol 38:980–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aoyagi S, Sugiyama M, Fukuda H (1998) BEN1 and ZEN1 cDNAs encoding S1-type DNases that are associated with programmed cell death in plants. FEBS Lett 429:134–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00563-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Demura T, Tashiro G, Horiguchi G, Kishimoto N, Kubo M, Matsuoka N, Minami A, Nagata-Hiwatashi M, Nakamura K, Okamura Y, Sassa N, Suzuki S, Yazaki J, Kikuchi S, Fukuda H (2002) Visualization by comprehensive microarray analysis of gene expression programs during transdifferentiation of mesophyll cells into xylem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15794–15799. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232590499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito J, Fukuda H (2002) ZEN1 is a key enzyme in the degradation of nuclear DNA during programmed cell death of tracheary elements. Plant Cell 14:3201–3211. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.006411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Thelen MP, Northcote DH (1989) Identification and purification of a nuclease from Zinnia elegans L.: a potential molecular marker for xylogenesis. Planta 179:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ye ZH, Droste DH (1996) Isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding xylogenesis-associated and wounding-induced ribonucleases in Zinnia elegans. Plant Mol Biol 30:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Beers EP, Freeman TB (1997) Proteinase activity during tracheary element differentiation in Zinnia mesophyll cultures. Plant Physiol 113:873–880. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.3.873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Minami A, Fukuda H (1995) Transient and specific expression of a cysteine endopeptidase associated with autolysis during differentiation of Zinnia mesophyll cells into tracheary elements. Plant Cell Physiol 36:1599–1606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ye ZH, Varnar JE (1996) Induction of cysteine and serine proteases during xylogenesis in Zinnia elegans. Plant Mol Biol 30:1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Groover A, DeWitt N, Heidel A, Jones A (1997) Programmed cell death of plant tracheary elements differentiating in vitro. Protoplasma 196:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakaba S, Kubo T, Funada R (2011) Nuclear DNA fragmentation during cell death of short-lived ray tracheids in the conifer Pinus densiflora. J Plant Res 124:379–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0384-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nakaba S, Kitin P, Yamagishi Y, Begum S, Kudo K, Nugroho WD, Funada R (2015) Three-dimensional imaging of cambium and secondary xylem cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy. In: Yeung ECT, Stasolla C, Summer MJ, Huang BQ (eds) Plant microtechniques and protocols. Springer, Berlin, pp 431–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19944-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Obara K, Kuriyama H, Fukuda H (2001) Direct evidence of active and rapid nuclear degradation triggered by vacuole rupture during programmed cell death in Zinnia. Plant Physiol 125:615–626. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.2.615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Groover A, Jones AM (1999) Tracheary element differentiation uses a novel mechanism coordinating programmed cell death and secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Physiol 119:375–384. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.119.2.375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuriyama H (1999) Loss of tonoplast integrity programmed in tracheary element differentiation. Plant Physiol 121:763–774. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.3.763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kubo M, Udagawa M, Nishikubo N, Horiguchi G, Yamaguchi M, Ito J, Mimura T, Fukuda H, Demura T (2005) Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes Dev 19:1855–1860. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1331305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Funk V, Kositsup B, Zhao C, Beers EP (2002) The Arabidopsis xylem peptidase XCP1 is a tracheary element vacuolar protein that may be a papain ortholog. Plant Physiol 128:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Avci U, Petzold HE, Ismail IO, Beers EP, Haigler CH (2008) Cysteine proteases XCP1 and XCP2 aid micro-autolysis within the intact central vacuole during xylogenesis in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J 56:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03592.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinoshita T, Yamada K, Hiraiwa N, Kondo M, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I (1999) Vacuolar processing enzyme is up-regulated in the lytic vacuoles of vegetative tissues during senescence and under various stressed conditions. Plant J 19:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00497.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hatsugai N, Kuroyanagi M, Yamada K, Meshi T, Tsuda S, Kondo M, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I (2004) A plant vacuolar protease, VPE, mediates virus-induced hypersensitive cell death. Science 305:855–858. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Turner S, Gallois P, Brown D (2007) Tracheary element differentiation. Ann Rev Plant Biol 58:407–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ohashi-Ito K, Oda Y, Fukuda H (2010) Arabidopsis Vascular Related NAC-domain6 directly regulates the genes that govern programmed cell death and secondary wall formation during xylem differentiation. Plant Cell 22:3461–3473. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.075036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bollhöner B, Zhang B, Stael S, Denancé N, Overmyer K, Goffner D, Van Breusegem F, Tuominen H (2013) Post mortem function of AtMC9 in xylem vessel elements. New Phytol 200:498–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pérez-Amador MA, Abler ML, De Rocher EJ, Thompson DM, van Hoof A, LeBrasseur ND, Lers A, Green PJ (2000) Identification of BFN1, a bifunctional nuclease induced during leaf and stem senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 122:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.1.169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Farage-Barhom S, Burd S, Sonego L, Perl-Treves R, Lers A (2008) Expression analysis of the BFN1 nuclease gene promoter during senescence, abscission, and programmed cell death-related processes. J Exp Bot 59:3247–3258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Courtois-Moreau CL, Pesquet E, Sjödin A, Muñiz L, Bollhöner B, Kaneda M, Samuels L, Jansson S, Tuominen H (2009) A unique program for cell death in xylem fibers of Populus stem. Plant J 58:260–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03777.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bollhöner B, Prestele J, Tuominen H (2012) Xylem cell death: emerging understanding of regulation and function. J Exp Bot 63:1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Moreau C, Aksenov N, Lorenzo MG, Segerman B, Funk C, Nilsson P, Jansson S, Tuominen H (2005) A genomic approach to investigate developmental cell death in woody tissues of Populus trees. Genome Biol 6:R34. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bollhöner B, Jokipii-Lukkari S, Bygdell J, Stael S, Adriasola M, Muñiz L, Van Breusegem F, Ezcurra I, Wingsle G, Tuominen H (2018) The function of two type II metacaspases in woody tissues of Populus trees. New Phytol 217:1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Escamez S, Tuominen H (2014) Programmes of cell death and autolysis in tracheary elements: when a suicidal cell arranges its own corpse removal. J Exp Bot 65:1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. IAWA (Committee on Nomenclature, International Association of Wood Anatomists) (1964) Multilingual glossary of terms used in wood anatomy. Verlagsanstalt Buchdruckerei Konkordia, Winterthur

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nobuchi T, Harada H (1983) Physiological features of the ‘white zone’ of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don)—cytological structure and moisture content. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 29:824–832

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nakada R, Fukatsu E (2012) Seasonal variation of heartwood formation in Larix kaempferi. Tree Physiol 32:1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nobuchi T, Harada H (1985) Ultrastructural changes in parenchyma cells of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) associated with heartwood formation. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 31:965–973

    Google Scholar 

  63. Abe H, Funada R (2005) The orientation of cellulose microfibrils in the cell walls of tracheids in conifers: a model based on observations by field emission-scanning electron microscopy. IAWA J 26:161–174. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Abe H, Funada R, Imaizumi H, Ohtani J, Fukazawa K (1995) Dynamic changes in the arrangement of cortical microtubules in conifer tracheids during differentiation. Planta 197:418–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Abe H, Funada R, Ohtani J, Fukazawa K (1995) Changes in the arrangement of microtubules and microfibrils in differentiating conifer tracheids during the expansion of cells. Ann Bot 75:305–310. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chaffey N, Barlow PW, Barnett JR (1997) Cortical microtubules rearrange during differentiation of vascular cambial derivatives, microfilaments do not. Trees 11:333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680050093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Funada R, Abe H, Furusawa O, Imaizumi H, Fukazawa K, Ohtani J (1997) The orientation and localization of cortical microtubules in differentiating conifer tracheids during cell expansion. Plant Cell Physiol 38:210–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Murakami Y, Funada R, Sano Y, Ohtani J (1999) The differentiation of contact cells and isolation cells in the xylem ray parenchyma of Populus maximowiczii. Ann Bot 84:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. IAWA committee (1989) IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bull 10:219–332

    Google Scholar 

  70. IAWA committee (2004) IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification. IAWA J 25:1–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Nakaba S, Kubo T, Funada R (2008) Differences in patterns of cell death between ray parenchyma cells and ray tracheids in the conifers Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigida. Trees 22:623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0220-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Nakaba S, Yoshimoto J, Kubo T, Funada R (2008) Morphological changes in the cytoskeleton, nuclei, and vacuoles during cell death of short-lived ray tracheids in the conifer Pinus densiflora. J Wood Sci 54:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-008-0971-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Fujikawa S, Ishida S (1975) Ultrastructure of ray parenchyma cell wall of softwood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 21:445–456

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yamamoto K (1982) Yearly and seasonal process of maturation of ray parenchyma cells in Pinus species. Res Bull College Exp For Hokkaido Univ 39:245–296

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nakaba S, Begum S, Yamagishi Y, Jin HO, Kubo T, Funada R (2012) Differences in the timing of cell death, differentiation and function among three different types of ray parenchyma cells in the hardwood Populus sieboldii × P. grandidentata. Trees 26:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0640-0

  76. Braun HJ, Wolkinger F, Böhme H (1967) Entwicklung und Bau der Holzstrahlen unter dem Aspekt der Kontakt-Isolations-Differenzierung gegenüber dem Hydrosystem. II. Die Typen der Kontakt-Holzstrahlen. Holzforschung 21:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1967.21.5.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Higuchi T, Fukazawa K, Nakashima S (1964) Studies on the mechanism of heartwood formation. I. Histochemistry of the wood tissue. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 10:235–241 (In Japanese with English summary)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Frey-Wyssling A, Bosshard HH (1959) Cytology of the ray cells in sapwood and heartwood. Holzforschung 13:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1959.13.5.129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Fukazawa K, Higuchi T (1965) Studies on the mechanism of heartwood formation. II. Some observations on nucleus and DNA content in the ray parenchyma cell. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 11:196–201 (In Japanese with English summary)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ma R, Luo J, Wang W, Fu Y (2023) Changes in the physiological activity of parenchyma cells in Dalbergia odorifera xylem and its relationship with heartwood formation. BMC Plant Biol 23:559. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04592-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Bhat KV, Patel JD (1980) Nuclear studies in relation to heartwood formation in Ougeinia oojeinensis Roxb. and Garuga pinnata Roxb. Caryologia 33:519–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1980.10796867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Bhat KV, Patel JD (1982) Nuclear behaviour during heartwood formation in Acacia auriculiformis A. Cann. Proc Indian Acad Sci 91:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Yang KC (1993) Survival rate and nuclear irregularity index of sapwood ray parenchyma cells in four tree species. Can J For Res 23:673–679. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Yang KC, Chen YS, Benson CA (1994) Vertical and radial variation of nuclear elongation index of living sapwood ray parenchyma cells in a plantation tree of Cryptomeria japonica. IAWA J 15:323–327. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Nakaba S, Sano Y, Funada R (2013) Disappearance of microtubules, nuclei and starch during cell death of ray parenchyma in Abies sachalinensis. IAWA J 34:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-00000012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Hirakawa Y, Ishida S, Ohtani J (1979) A SEM observation of organelles in the cambial and living xylem cells in Todomatsu (Abies sachalinensis). Res Bull Exp Forest Hokkaido Univ 36:459–468

    Google Scholar 

  87. Nobuchi T, Harada H (1968) Electron microscopy of the cytological structure of the ray parenchyma cells associated with heartwood formation of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 14:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  88. Nobuchi T, Kuroda K, Iwata R, Harada H (1982) Cytological study of the seasonal features of heartwood formation of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 28:669–676

    Google Scholar 

  89. Arakawa I, Funada R, Nakaba S (2018) Changes in the morphology and functions of vacuoles during the death of ray parenchyma cells in Cryptomeria japonica. J Wood Sci 64:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-017-1692-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Nakaba S, Sano Y, Kubo T, Funada R (2006) The positional distribution of cell death of ray parenchyma in a conifer, Abies sachalinensis. Plant Cell Rep 25:1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0194-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Nobuchi T, Takahara S, Harada H (1979) Studies on the survival rate of ray parenchyma cells with ageing process in coniferous secondary xylem. Bull Kyoto Univ For 51:239–246 (In Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gartner BL, Baker DC, Spicer R (2000) Distribution and vitality of xylem rays in relation to tree leaf area in Douglas-fir. IAWA J 21:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Spicer R, Holbrook NM (2007) Parenchyma cell respiration and survival in secondary xylem: does metabolic activity decline with cell age? Plant Cell Env 30:934–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01677.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Ziegler H (1968) Biological aspects of heartwood formation. Holz Roh Werkst 26:61–68 (In German with English summary)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Nobuchi T, Tokuchi N, Harada H (1987) Variability of heartwood formation and cytological features in broad-leaved trees. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 33:596–604

    Google Scholar 

  96. Fukazawa K, Higuchi T (1966) Studies on the mechanism of heartwood formation. IV. RNA content in the ray parenchyma cell. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 12:221–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Goodwin RH, Goddard DR (1940) The oxygen consumption of isolated woody tissues. Am J Bot 27:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1940.tb14676.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Higuchi T, Fukazawa K, Shimada M (1967) Biochemical studies on the heartwood formation. Res Bull Exp For Hokkaido Univ 25:167–193

    Google Scholar 

  99. Pruyn ML, Gartner BL, Harmon ME (2002) Respiratory potential in sapwood of old versus young ponderosa pine trees in the Pacific Northwest. Tree Physiol 22:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.2-3.105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Pruyn ML, Gartner BL, Harmon ME (2002) Within-stem variation of respiration in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir) trees. New Phytol 154:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00380.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Pruyn ML, Harmon ME, Gartner BL (2003) Stem respiratory potential in six softwood and four hardwood tree species in the central cascades of Oregon. Oecologia 137:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1316-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Pruyn ML, Gartner BL, Harmon ME (2005) Storage versus substrate limitation to bole respiratory potential in two coniferous tree species of contrasting sapwood width. J Exp Bot 56:2637–2649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Bowman WP, Barbour MM, Turnbull MH, Tissue DT, Whitehead D, Griffin K (2005) Sap flow rates and sapwood density are critical factors in within- and between-tree variation in CO2 efflux from stems of mature Dacrydium cupressinum trees. New Phytol 167:815–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01478.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Shain L, Mackay JFG (1973) Seasonal fluctuation in respiration of aging xylem in relation to heartwood formation in Pinus radiata. Can J Bot 51:737–741. https://doi.org/10.1139/b73-092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Yang J, Kamdem DP, Keathley DE, Han KH (2004) Seasonal changes in gene expression at the sapwood-heartwood transition zone of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) revealed by cDNA microarray analysis. Tree Physiol 24:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.4.461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Yoshida K, Futamura N, Nishiguchi M (2012) Collection of expressed genes from the transition zone of Cryptomeria japonica in the dormant season. J Wood Sci 58:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-011-1234-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Lim KJ, Paasela T, Harju A, Venäläinen M, Paulin L, Auvinen P, Kärkkäinen K, Teeri TH (2016) Developmental changes in Scots pine transcriptome during heartwood formation. Plant Physiol 172:1403–1417. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Yeh TF, Chu JH, Liu LY, Chen SY (2020) Differential gene profiling of the heartwood formation process in Taiwania cryptomerioides Hayata xylem tissues. Int J Mol Sci 21:960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang R, Zhang Z, Yan C, Chen Z, Li X, Zeng B, Hu B (2024) Comparative physiological, biochemical, metabolomic, and transcriptomic analyses reveal the formation mechanism of heartwood for Acacia melanoxylon. BMC Plant Biol 24:308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04884-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Huang Z, Meilan R, Woeste K (2009) A KNAT3-like homeobox gene from Juglans nigra L., JnKNAT3-like, highly expressed during heartwood formation. Plant Cell Rep 28:1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0771-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Moshchenskaya YL, Galibina NA, Nikerova KM, Tarelkina TV, Korzhenevsky MA, Sofronova IN, Ershova MA, Semenova LI (2022) Plant-programmed cell death-associated genes participation in Pinus sylvestris L. trunk tissue formation. Plants 11:3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Nakaba S, Takata N, Yoshida M, Funada R (2015) Continuous expression of genes for xylem cysteine peptidases in long-lived ray parenchyma cells in Populus. Plant Biotechnol 32:21–29. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.1208a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Nakaba S, Arakawa I, Morimoto H, Bito N, Imai T, Nakada R, Funada R (2016) Agatharesinol biosynthesis-related changes of ray parenchyma in sapwood sticks of Cryptomeria japonica during cell death. Planta 243:1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2473-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Imai T, Nomura M (2005) Induction of the biosynthesis of agatharesinol, a norlignan, in sapwood sticks of Cryptomeria japonica under humidity-regulated circumstances. J Wood Sci 51:537–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-004-0675-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Koh Yasue, Prof. Hajime Kobayashi, and the staff of the Experimental Forest of Shinshu University and of the Sapporo Experimental Nursery of Hokkaido University for providing plant materials. The authors acknowledge the Japan Wood Research Society for providing the Article Processing Charge of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H03014, JP20K21327, JP21H02253, JP23H02273, and JP23K26966, and was also supported by the Japan Wood Research Society through JSPS KAKENHI, Grants-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results (JP 22HP2003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SN wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Nakaba.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakaba, S., Funada, R. Cell death of long-lived ray parenchyma cells during heartwood formation in trees. J Wood Sci 70, 46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02160-2

Keywords