Skip to main content

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

A review on properties and variability of Pinus Pinaster Ait. ssp. Atlantica existing in the Landes of Gascogne

Abstract

Pinus Pinaster Ait. is a softwood species indigenous of the South West of Europe, broadly spread alongside the Mediterranean Sea and present worldwide. Pinus Pinaster Ait. (ssp. Atlantica) is largely used in industrial applications including construction and buildings in the Southwest of France as it has widely grown across the whole area. However, very often, Pinus Pinaster Ait.-based product design strategies make use of properties of generic softwood species due to the lack of a proper database (or review) on the topic. This review article aims to exhaustively present the consistent scientific literature on Pinus Pinaster Ait. properties focusing on its physical, hygrical, thermal and mechanical properties. Indeed, a vast literature exists, laid out across a wide range of years and countries.

Introduction

The forestry and wood industry have become significant sectors of interest following the new environmental considerations highlighted by the rising energy challenges inside the construction industry. Indeed, wood is a natural, renewable, and eco-material which can reduce structures environmental footprints and help reach the sustainable development goals (SDGs) laid down by the United Nations. It is of the utmost significance to promote and master local wood species, especially softwood, to lessen global energy consumption. Several species like scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L. 1753) or Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst 1881) have been thoroughly studied and widely used by Western and Northern European Countries such as Germany and Sweden. In the South West of France, maritime pine (Pinus Pinaster Ait. 1789) is a dominantly present species broadly used in many domains and economically essential.

From the end of World War II, the use of Pinus Pinaster Ait. has changed from simple resin extraction to production of timber and paper in the Southwest of France with a rotation period of around 40 years [1]. In the Landes of Gascogne, the volume harvested stays important (1.424 millions \(\mathrm {m^3}\) in 2019) despite a large diminution provoked by the consequences of wind and fire damages (2.148 millions \(\mathrm {m^3}\) in 2013) [2]. Nowadays, the local forest industry is separated between first pulpwood production destined to the paper industry, then lumber production for wood packaging, furnitures, wood construction, and finally pellet or residues intended for fuelwood [2]. Several construction applications are visible in the Landes of Gascogne, testimony of the utilisation of Pinus Pinaster Ait. throughout the years: from pine bards, remnant of the agropastoral farming system of the 19th century, to private and public buildings [3]. The rise of interest for wood in construction can be attributed to an increase demand for processed wood products such as cross-laminated timber and glued laminated timber (glulam) allowing a wide range of shape and dimensions. Wood distortions issued from thermo-hygric variations can be considerably reduced in glulam by assembling a disparity of lamellae typology [4]. This advantage is noticeably reduced when using Pinus Pinaster Ait. timber compared to other softwood species. Several studies work on the overall amelioration of Pinus Pinaster Ait. glulam properties. Balmori et al. proposed to upgrade the properties of duo beams with an internal glass fibre-reinforced polymer whilst Clouet attempted to estimate the shape stability of multiples configurations of glulam finger-jointed with green wood [5, 6]. In spite of the fact those studies require specific data on Pinus Pinaster Ait., the vast majority of studies uses classical softwood properties [7].

To deal with this issue and to make data on Pinus Pinaster Ait. more easily accessible to improve analyses on its industrial applications, the main purpose of this article is to propose a bibliographic review on physical properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. The available literature on the topic is not easily accessible, it is written in languages other than English and the available data sometimes require further processing. Therefore, a review on physical properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. seems necessary to gather and improve knowledge on this local richness, destined to be used as a renewable eco-material and more studied in the near future. Hereby, the present work reviews general information of Pinus Pinaster Ait. considering multiple provenance and subspecies. Wood properties of industrial interest and their variability will be then exhaustively presented. This work is focused on Pinus Pinaster Ait. subspecies Atlantica for his importance in the Southwest of France. The properties of the species Pinus Pinaster Ait. are additionally briefly compared to the properties of others softwoods such as Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris for their global importance in the wood European industry and Pinus nigra Arn. 1785, Pinus pinea L. 1753, Pinus radiata D. Don 1836, and Pinus taeda L. 1753 for their geographic proximity with Pinus Pinaster Ait.

General information on Pinus Pinaster Ait.

Taxonomy

Pinus Pinaster Ait. is a conifer (Pinophyta division) in the genus Pinus. This species was first legitimately referenced by W. Aiton in 1789 in the Horthus Kewensis [8]. Even though its correct name is Pinus Pinaster Ait., it is sometimes erroneously referred (nomen illegitimum) as Pinus Pinaster Soland or Pinus maritima and is commonly called maritime pine or cluster pine. Two main subspecies exist that differ by their geographical location. The first one is Pinus Pinaster ssp. Pinaster, which is commonly called Pinus mesogeensis or mesogean pine, and the second one is Pinus Pinaster ssp. Atlantica, also known as Atlantic pine [9]. On the one hand, mesogean pine is mainly present on the occidental shores of the Mediterranean Sea across several provenances like Spain, South and South East of France, Northwest of Italy, Corsica, Sardinia, and Maghreb [10]. On the other hand, Atlantic pine is present in the Iberian Peninsula (especially Portugal and Galicia) and the Southwest of France (particularly in the Landes of Gascogne) [11, 12].

History of population

Pinus Pinaster Ait. is originated from the Southwest of Europe. Archaeological discoveries found traces of Pinus Pinaster Ait. in the South of France dated from the Paleolithic [13]. Thanks to anthracological studies, the presence of individuals has also been found during the Late Prehistory and Protohistory in Northwestern Portugal and in Northeastern Portugal dated from the Mesolithic [14, 15]. In the Late Iron Age (5th to 1st century B.C.), it was well-settled in this area and the Southwest of the Iberian Peninsula and vastly used in settlement construction [16, 17]. These observations led to the main theory that the species was autochthonous of these regions in the early Holocene and survived as monospecific stand or mixed with oaks (Quercus) ubiquitous in the area. Last, artificial forest (plantation) for wood or resin exploitation has proven unlikely in central Spain [18].

Forest dynamics are greatly influenced by several events, called disturbances, leading to modifications on forest ecosystems, referred to as succession [19]. These disturbances can be natural events (fire, storm, landslide, volcanic activity, insects, fungi), animal-caused events (grazing), or anthropogenic disturbances (warfare, pollution, tree crops). During the Antiquity to the beginning of the Middle Age, forests including Pinus Pinaster Ait. in the Iberian Peninsula were considerably modified by natural, climatic, and anthropogenic events [20]. Several alternations of humid and arid periods (like the Iberian-Roman Humid Period in Spain) and natural disasters (fire) alternated the vegetation.

Nonetheless, the most critical modification was bought by human activities starting from the Late Iron Age and, particularly, during the Roman Empire (1st century B.C. to 5th century A.D.) and the Visigothic Kingdom (5th to 8th century A.D.). Indeed, the development of agriculture and pastoralism, construction of settlements and roads, or cultivation of favoured species (chestnut and olive) provoked vast campaigns of woodland clearings especially by fire [20].

Fire-related reproductive traits (pyrophyte) explain the proliferation of Pinus Pinaster Ait. during the second part of the Middle Age (7th to 15th) marked by a combination of intensifying fire regime [21].

The beginning of the Early Modern Period (15th–16th centuries) showed a high rate of deforestation and, particularly, Pinus Pinaster Ait. in Southwestern Europe because of its uses in naval construction, buildings construction, charcoal demand, and exportation with a peak around the beginning of the Late Modern Period (18th–19th centuries).

Since then, specific French legislation was approved to protect forests. Broad reforestation campaigns impacted both public and private sectors. Reforestation of mountains area and stabilisation of coastal dunes promoted the plantation of Pinus Pinaster Ait. because of its ability to grow on low productivity and fertility soils (sandy, acidic soils, rich in silica or sandstone, and granitic arenas). In the Landes of Gascogne, its implementation had the initial purpose of rehabilitating the land for later agrarian activities. However, in a second time, pine-wood exploitation started participating significantly in the rural economy. Many products such as firewood, charcoal, tar, resin, pitch, turpentine, or rosin that were widely used in a large number of industries were produced using and exploiting Pinus Pinaster Ait. proliferation [22]. Nowadays, Pinus Pinaster Ait. is mainly processed in three major industries: wood production and exploitation, resin extraction, and papermaking.

As a last remark concerning other countries, from the end of the 17th century, as shown in Fig. 1, in the Southern Hemisphere like in Uruguay (1890), Argentina and Chile, South-Africa (1690), Australia (1920) and New Zealand, lacking fast-growing softwood species able to grow in harsh environment, decided to introduce Pinus Pinaster Ait. into their territory on infertile or sandy soil [23,24,25]. Subsequently, it has been considered as an invasive species in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand [26].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pinus Pinaster Ait. worldwide distribution adapted from GBIF (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International) maps [161, 162]

Fig. 2
figure 2

Example of the evolution of the mean microfibril angle as a function of the ring number of a 30-year-old specimen measured, adapted from [39]

Fig. 3
figure 3

Light microscope images showing the anatomical differentiation of Pinus Pinaster Ait. cells in a complete growth ring [43] with the different parts of initial wood, final wood, and inter-annual density fluctuation (IADF)

Current population of Pinus Pinaster Ait.

The worldwide area covered by Pinus Pinaster Ait. is approximately 4.4 million hectares, from which 4.2 million are situated in the countries Pinus Pinaster Ait. originated from, as shown in Fig. 1. The remaining 200 \(\times \ 10^3\) hectares are located in other areas where Pinus Pinaster Ait. was imported. It represents 51% of the total forest area in Aquitaine (with respectively 84% and 75% in the Landes and Gironde departments), 23% in Portugal, and 23% in Galicia [3, 27]. However, recent natural disasters caused important damages to the local Pinus Pinaster Ait. population in these two French departments such as two storms, respectively Lothar and Martin in 1999 (24 millions \(\mathrm {m}^{3}\)) and Klaus in 2009 (37 millions \(\mathrm {m}^{3}\)) [1], and the forest fires of the few last years and especially 2022 (30790 hectares according to EFFIS’s data [28]). Numerous other threats affect Pinus Pinaster Ait. such as insect attacks (Dioryctria sylvestrella, Rhyacionia buoliana, Thaumetopoea pityocampa), fungal attacks, inter-individual competition, and drought [9, 29,30,31]. Studies showed the vast importance of mixed stands compared to monospecific ones involving Pinus Pinaster Ait. on the resilience of forests to drought and more generally climate change impacts across Europe [32, 33]. Nonetheless, climate change could lead to extend the suitable area for Pinus Pinaster Ait. in the Iberian Peninsula in comparison to other species [34], as the species evolved originally in a pre-Mediterranean tropical-like environment [35], and is more fire adaptable than some of the other softwoods (Pinus nigra and Pinus pinea) in the area [36].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Impact of wind solicitations on the inclination of trunks and transverse section shape of Pinus Pinaster Ait. trees planted in coastal dune regions [59]

Fig. 5
figure 5

Juvenile wood limit identification by an intersection method relying on linear regressions of final wood relative densities as a function of the cambial age for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [1]

Fig. 6
figure 6

Illustration of Pinus Pinaster Duramen characterised by a “darker red” colouring [1]

Xylology of Pinus Pinaster Ait.

Variability and structure of wood

Wood is a highly heterogeneous and anisotropic natural composite whose constitution results from layers accumulation through cambial activity responsible for the diametrical growth of trees. A local orthotropic coordinate system to describe the trunk geometry can be defined by three planes of orthogonal symmetry: the transversal plan RT, the longitudinal radial plan LR, and the longitudinal tangential plane LT. Three preferential directions can be distinguished: the longitudinal direction L of the stem, the radial direction R corresponding to the direction of diametrical growth, and the direction T tangential to the growth rings [37].

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Elliptical Duramen formation induced by the presence of compressive wood under trunk inclination in Pinus Pinaster Ait. [79], b transverse section of Pinus Pinaster Ait. containing compressive wood in comparison to softwood and hardwood transverse section [40]

Fig. 8
figure 8

a Cumulate length of the stem and b length increment to the stem per year for 32, 20, and 10 samples of 8-, 22-, and 48-year-old Pinus Pinaster Ait. trees, respectively, as a function of the ontogenetical age [82]

Fig. 9
figure 9

Inter-ring values for earlywood, latewood, and total ring width as function of ring number for the first 12 rings of a Portuguese (Leiria) Pinus Pinaster Ait. [89]

Cambium division is primarily influenced by external conditions such as characteristics of the biotope, interactions with the biocenosis, climatic environment, silviculture, tree height, and tree ageing, which affect the cambium division capability and variability of wood properties at different levels: between species, between provenances, inter-tree, intra-tree, inter growth rings, and intra growth rings.

Anatomy of Pinus Pinaster Ait.

At the microscopic scale, wood is composed by tracheids which are longitudinal elements constituting 90% of softwood cells. They are formed by cells organised in different layers. The cell walls are natural fibrous composites composed of microfibrils of cellulose (\(46.37\%\)) in a matrix of hemicellulose (\(24.21\%\) and lignin (\(28.99\%\)) with additional extractive contents in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. [38]. Close to no information exists in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. on the layers geometry except for the second sub-layer of the secondary cell wall. The sub-layer \(\mathrm {S}_2\) represents an important part of the secondary layer (75%–85% of the final thickness) and has an organisation of microfibrils in parallel lamellæ and inclined compared to the cell axis (10\(^{\circ }\)–30\(^{\circ }\) and can reach around 40\(^{\circ }\) in reaction wood (RW) and in juvenile wood in the case Pinus Pinaster Ait. [39]. The orientation of this secondary sub-layer, defined by the angle of micro-fibrils (MFA), and its importance in terms of total mass and thickness are responsible for the mechanical behaviour of the wood cell wall. Limited literature does exist in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. for the MFA, especially as a function of the distance to the pith. Brémaud et al. found values for Pinus Pinaster Ait. (average with two other softwood species) of 22.4\(^{\circ }\) at 6.9 \(\textrm{cm}\) [40] from the pith (corresponding to a cambial age of 8 years) whilst Lundqvist et al. provided the evolution of MFA for a few sample of Pinus pinaster Ait.) with ring number [39], as illustrated in Fig. 2. For other softwood species, Donaldson provided mean ring MFAs data for Pinus radiata ranging between \(9^\circ\) and \(55^\circ\) [41] and Auty et al. found values ranging from \(5^\circ\) and \(35^\circ\) for MFAs in the case of Pinus sylvestris [42]. The additive manufacturing of tracheids cells resulting from cambial activity is responsible for the tree diametrical growth. Tracheid geometries are defined by several parameters such as number of cells, lumen width or radial–tangential fibre width, radial and tangential cell wall width (total width of constituting layers) and tracheid length. Typical values for these anatomic parameters in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. are reported in Table 2 [38, 39, 43,44,45,46,47]. The anatomy of Pinus Pinaster Ait. cells is particularly dependent of the climatic conditions affecting the cambial activity and can endure important modifications during an annual growing season, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Pinus Pinaster Ait. tracheids are mostly divided into three different types, i.e., initial wood of important lumen diameter and thin cell wall width, final wood of narrower lumen and thicker cell wall, and zones of inter-annual density fluctuation (IADF) which corresponds to the apparition of initial wood-like cells in the final wood zone, which can be explained as a defense mechanism against drought period [43]. Several focus on the influence of climatic environment (solar radiation, temperature, water availability, and evapotranspiration) and characteristics of the biotope (altitude, soil properties) on the anatomy of the species Pinus Pinaster Ait. Bogino and Bravo showed a \(60.8\%\) of the total variance of radial growth of Pinus Pinaster Ait. samples from the Iberian Peninsula with climate environment and especially precipitation and temperature [35] and found a good correlation between radial growth, temperature, and altitude. Carvalho et al. linked the variability of lumen diameter and cell wall thickness with soil moisture content and temperature, respectively [44]. Ballesteros et al. studied the modification of cell anatomy of Pinus Pinaster Ait. after wounds obtained by flash foods [48]. Riesco Muñoz and Barrio Anta studied the modification of anatomical parameters of Pinus Pinaster Ait. cells with gravitropic modification inducing the apparition of compressive wood [49]. In the case of IADFs, Wilkinson et al. found a strong correlation between the apparition of IADFs in the final wood with precipitation events following summer drought [43]. Campelo et al. and Vieira et al. found an increased frequency of apparition of IADFs in specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. with larger diameters [50] and in young trees [51], respectively. Moreover, Nabais et al. observed a strong species-dependent influence of IADFs apparition by studying the differences arising between two softwoods, i.e. Pinus negra and Pinus Pinaster Ait. [52]. The influence of the climate environment on the anatomy and the growth response is distinctly variable according to softwood species. Hernández-Alonso et al. showed that Pinus Pinaster Ait. is the species the most impacted by temperature in comparison to Pinus negra and Pinus sylvestris much more impacted by water availability [53]. Häusser et al. found temperature of growth initiation colder for Pinus nigra in comparison to Pinus Pinaster Ait. provoking a 1 month time shift in the period of growth initiation [54]. Finally, Olivar et al. studied the differences in the historic of precipitation on growth response and IADFs between Pinus Pinaster Ait., more impacted by the preceding winter and spring of growing season, and Pinus sylvestris, impacted by mostly by summer precipitation [55].

Fig. 10
figure 10

Inter-ring values for total ring width as function of ring number for the first 23 rings of specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. originating from several provenances [90]

Fig. 11
figure 11

Inter-ring values for wood grain angle as function of ring number for the first 27 rings of specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. originating from several provenance [163]

Fig. 12
figure 12

Height influence on grain angle for Pinus Pinaster Ait. obtained A—in [1] (values should be read with opposite sign) thanks to a calibrated inclinometer and B—two trees obtained in [64] by measuring the direction of crack propagation in splitting tests

Growth-influencing mechanisms

The presence of heterogeneous factors in the growth environment leads to curvature and stem reorientation (also called tropism) of the plant, i.e. modifications of cross-section shape and size, eccentricity of the pith. Tropisms are mainly divided into phototropism, gravitropism and thigmotropism (reorientation due to external contact stress) [56]. Pinus Pinaster Ait. of the Landes situated in coastal dunes is particularly influenced by strong prevailing winds (anemotropism) [57].

Fig. 13
figure 13

a Evolution of intra-ring relative density as a function of the position in the ring studied (mm) and b corresponding relative densities frequency apparition for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [164]

Fig. 14
figure 14

Latewood percentage evolution as function of ring number for specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. originating from several provenance [90]

Fig. 15
figure 15

Highlighting of the False Ring or IADF phenomenon in Pinus Pinaster Ait. thanks to the study of intra-ring density as a function of position in the ring [101]

Regarding anemotropism, Polge et al. analysed the inclination of trunks of Pinus Pinaster Ait. population of Landes of Gascogne according to the preferential west to east wind flow directions [58]. Berthier et al. highlighted several phenomena resulting from wind effects (static) such as the inclination of the stem, imbalance of the crown, eccentricity, non-circularity of the sections, pre-existing constraints on the trees root system, and presence of RW, as shown in Fig. 4 [59]. The same authors presented the action of wind turbulence on the geometric shape of the trunk with the reduction of stem lengths, more comprehensive sections combined with meplat (non-circular trunk), and eccentricity of the pith [59].

Genetics has also an important influence on growth. Several studies on genetic modifications of Pinus Pinaster Ait. have been carried out to improve the growth and straightness of Pinus Pinaster Ait. stems considered as “bad” for the timber industry due to their eccentricity [57, 60]. The genetic characteristics of Pinus Pinaster Ait. and the possibility of genetic selection were first inquired between 1930 and 1950 [61]. An extensive breeding program was then performed since 1960 to genetically improve the properties of this specie with two main goals: to genetic gain in growth and stem straightness as well as to preserve diversity in the breeding populations [62]. An improvement ranging between 15% and 30% was measured from the first bred generation to the early 2000s population whilst the second purpose was less studied in spite of its major importance [60, 63].

Fig. 16
figure 16

Evolution of inter-ring mean relative densities as a function of ring number for 552 specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. originating from Leiria-Portugal [89]

Fig. 17
figure 17

Evolution of inter-ring mean relative densities as a function of ring number for the first 23 rings of specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. originating from several provenance [90]

Fig. 18
figure 18

Evolution of latewood relative density as a function to ring width and cambial age obtained experimentally for specimens of Pinus Pinaster Ait. [1]

Last, silviculture has a substantial impact on tree growth. Indeed, variables such as population density, thinning regimes, and rotation forestry duration exploit response mechanisms aforementioned and influence the growth and properties of trees for aesthetic or economic purposes [37, 57, 64]. The current rotation duration used for Pinus Pinaster Ait. silviculture is considered short and ranges between 20 and 40 years [1].

Physiological properties

Juvenile and adult wood

An analysis of wood properties allows establishing an age limit between juvenile and adult wood located far from the pith. This boundary can vary according to tree height, ring density and fibre length [65]. Moreau et al. proposed a method for identifying the juvenile wood–adult wood limit that uses delimitation techniques successfully performed on other softwood species such as Douglas fir or Scots pine [1]. This method is based on linear regressions on final wood density measurements inside growth rings. This method can be used in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. because of the abrupt limit between juvenile and adult wood [66]. The usual limit found is approximately 12 years for Pinus Pinaster Ait. and can reach 9 years, as schematically illustrated by Fig. 5 [1]. For Pinus sylvestris, Sauter et al. found a mean limit of 22-year old with a standard deviation value comprised between 5- and 7-year old [67].

Heartwood and sapwood

Heartwood is characterised by a colour change with respect to sapwood that, in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., takes a “darker red” colouring, as illustrated Fig. 6. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., there is no fundamental differences between longitudinal modulus of elasticity of sapwood and heartwood [68]. An hypothesis seems to link the formation of heartwood to the tree general energy consumption. Heartwood being composed by dead cells, its formation could optimise sapwood surface area to adjust the energy inflow according to the leaf sap demand [69]. This phenomenon has been explained by the Pipe Model Theory [70, 71] which was demonstrated for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [68]. Further studies have shown the influence of internal parameters on heartwood formation such as genetics [72] and cambial age, and external parameters such as environment and silviculture [69, 73]. Knapic and Pereira showed an initial heartwood formation in Pinus Pinaster Ait. around 21 years followed by constant annual development rates dependent on cambial age of 0.5 and 0.7 rings/year for a cambial age inferior and superior to 50 years, respectively [74]. Gjerdrum found a similar relationship in Pinus sylvestris with a rate of formation of 0.5 rings/year for a cambial age of 50 years up to a rate of 0.8 rings/year at 200 years [75].

The surface percentage of heartwood, relative to total surface, in the transverse plane varies along the longitudinal direction of the tree. Taylor et al. described the general heartwood surface percentage profile in the longitudinal direction of the tree as an irregular cone [69]. This conical profile is not found in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. Indeed, an increasing heartwood surface percentage was found up to an height of 3–6 m followed by a constant decrease in Pinus Pinaster Ait. The specific height was estimated around 35% of the total height for 20 trees of Pinus Pinaster Ait. [1, 73, 74, 76]. Giroud et al. found a similar profile for Betula papyrifera [77]. The lower water conductivity at the tree base for Pinus Pinaster Ait. could explain this particular profile. Indeed, the duraminisation would slow down to compensate the conduction loss [78].

Variability in the transverse heartwood profile also exists. A quasi-circular shape of the heartwood surface up to an average height of 10 m in certain individuals of Pinus Pinaster Ait. has been found [76]. Variation of heartwood percentage or shape can occur because of pith eccentricity, meplat (elliptical shape of the trunk), crown influence, or presence of RW resulting from external mechanical solicitations (wind, snow). The number of duramen rings is greater on the compression side, as schematically represented in Fig. 7 [68, 79]. Mechanisms of increased heartwood formation induced by compression wood (CW) presence are still relatively unknown [72].

Reaction wood

The reorientation of the stem is ensured by the formation of RW which has different property when compared to normal wood (NW) [80]. In softwoods, RW is also referred as CW and occurs in the wood region under compression (e.g., downwind), as illustrated in Fig. 7(b). In CW, the transition between initial and final wood is progressive for species where this anatomical transition is usually abrupt, which is the case for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [58]. Radi and Castéra present the CW distribution of two Pinus Pinaster Ait. trunks that show a consequent reorientation induced by basal rectification (tilted ground) or reorientation by phototropism [64]. The average CW percentages in the two individuals are 3.89% and 5.97%, respectively, despite a greater basal inclination in the first case. In the French Pinus Pinaster Ait. industry, the presence of CW is neglected because of its difficult identification.

Geometric properties

Height and diameter

The species Pinus Pinaster Ait. is a fast-growing softwood that reach around 23–26 m in height for a diameter at breast height ranging between 415 mm and 470 mm and tree age between 35- and 48-year old [81, 82] in comparison with the most popular industrial softwood species in Europe, i.e. Picea abies, that reach height of approximately 18–24 m for a diameter at breast height ranging between 150 mm and 300 mm and tree age between 36- and 43-year old (in Lithuania) [83] and a locally relative species, i.e. Pinus nigra, that reach height of approximately 15–27 m for a diameter at breast height ranging between 200 mm and 400 mm and tree age between 58- and 93-year old (in Portugal) [84]. Typical values for height increment, tree height, and diameter at breast height for Pinus Pinaster Ait. are reported in Tab. 3 [81, 82, 85,86,87]. Radial growth and height increment are two geometric parameters widely influence by the climatic environment, particularly precipitation and temperature historic (duration, season of occurrences). The impact of drought is more important on height increment and basal radial growth than radial growth on the upper part of the stem [87]. The annual height increment comprises between 20 and 180 cm for 10 samples of Pinus Pinaster Ait. dominant trees from Soria in Spain in [87] and 30 to 120 cm for 62 samples of Pinus Pinaster Ait. dominant trees ranging between 8-, 22-, and 48-year old from Bordeaux in France in [82]. In dominant trees of Pinus Pinaster Ait., where the influence of resource competition is minimum, the height increment increases rapidly in the early ages of a tree until around 10-year old followed by a constant decline with ontogenetical age, as illustrated in Fig. 8.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Intra-tree experimental evolution of the longitudinal modulus of elasticity as a function of tree height, distance from the pith, and silviculture options for Pinus Pinaster Ait., adapted from [1]

Fig. 20
figure 20

Variation of a flexural strength, b compression strength parallel to grain, and c traction strength perpendicular to grain relative to properties measured at 10% of total radius DP10 as a function of radius from the pith and percentage of total height for Pinus Pinaster Ait., adapted from [146]

Fig. 21
figure 21

Variation of a flexural strength, b compression strength parallel to grain, and c traction strength perpendicular to grain relative to properties measured at tree base “butt” as a function of percentage of total height and radius from the pith for Pinus Pinaster Ait., adapted from [146]

Ring width

The ring width is the geometric parameter the most reflecting of the climatic condition undergone by Pinus Pinaster Ait. during the growing season. Except for tree species growing in harsh environments, ring width is not a constant.

Ring width decreases along the diametrical direction from the pith to the bark for a given height, with a pronounced decrease in the juvenile wood, from a value of around 8–12 mm to an asymptotic value of around 2 mm. An exception exists in the first rings because of the growing difficulties (competition, climatic hazards) experienced in the younger stages of a tree [57]. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., an increase in ring width in the first rings (up to the first 5–9) and then a constant decrease for a sample of eight 83-year-old pines was found [88]. This tendency can also be observed with samples measurements, as illustrated in both Figs. 9 and 10 [89, 90]. In the case of other softwoods, Dias et al. found a constant decrease of mean ring width with cambial age from a value of around 5–6 mm to an asymptotic value around 1 mm reached around 40 years in the case of Pinus nigra [84].

Typical values of the ring width for the Pinus Pinaster Ait. are reported in Table 4. The measuring techniques can be very different: Nicholls measures ring widths at the green state with a low-power objective lens engraved with a precision scale of 0.1 mm, Burgers uses an “Absolute Digital Metric Indicator” at 12% moisture content with a precision of 0.02 mm, Gaspar and Louzada measure this property at a conditioned 12% moisture content with X-rayed images (no information about the used instrument is given) [89,90,91,92,93,94].

The proportion of initial wood is higher in the upper part of the tree than in the lower part (70% to 83%). The width of initial wood is always greater than final wood one in Pinus Pinaster Ait. Therefore, a larger ring width in the top of the trunk is explained by juvenile wood presence. These observations are in agreement with the general theory of ring width variations [57].

Grain angle

The grain angle is the angle between the direction of the wood fibre and the longitudinal direction in the LT plane. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., the grain angle can rise up to \(8^{\circ }\) around the first few rings before gradually decreasing with cambial age, as illustrated in Figs. 11 and 12. High intra-tree variability of the grain angle (between −1.8\(^{\circ }\) and +10.4\(^{\circ }\) with a coefficient of variation of 88%) using a radioactive tracer to facilitate measurements is observed [95]. The tendency for the grain angle to increase in the first few rings close to the pith and then to decrease gradually with ring number is common to other softwood species, where the grain angle can rise to values up to \(12^\circ\) in the case of Pinus radiata [96] and Picea abies [97] before decreasing to reach values down to \(-12^\circ\) in the case of Picea abies [97].

In the vertical direction of the tree, at a given distance from the pith, the wood grain angle seems to increase gradually from the basal area to the top of the tree, as shown in Fig. 12. This phenomenon can be explained by the increasing proportion of juvenile wood along this direction [57]. Density, straightness, and the presence of RW do not seem to impact the wood grain angle [1].

Physical properties: density

Wood density is an important physical parameter because of its influence on the mechanical properties, its ease of measurement, its use as a wood quality criterion [60], and its reflection of the growing season climate conditions.

Intra-ring density

In softwoods, such as Pinus Pinaster Ait., the ratio final wood density to initial wood density belongs to the range \(\left( 2,4 \right)\) [91]. Density variations within a ring have been linked to anatomic variations due to cambial activity. The common density profile for a ring composed of initial and final wood in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. is shown in Fig. 13. The intra-ring relative density values are usually comprised between 0.2 and 0.9 for Pinus Pinaster and are similar to the one obtained for Picea abies where the values are usually comprised between 0.3 and 0.9 [98].

This initial–final wood structure is an essential source of density variation at the microscopic level [99]. This differentiation is produced by a change in the water supply/demand balance during the growing season and hence is deeply related to climatic conditions [78, 100]. The proportion of final wood in a ring in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. is highly variable and it depends upon several parameters, like climatic conditions, RW and ring age, see Fig. 14. Typical values of intra-ring density and proportion of latewood for the Pinus Pinaster Ait. are reported in Table 5. Most of studies obtain density values using a microdensitometric analysis on X-rayed images (samples conditioned at 12% moisture content) [1, 89, 93, 101,102,103]. They compute densities from anatomical data on cell walls [43].

Furthermore, particular climatic conditions (succession of rainfall after severe drought) can trigger cambial reactivation and unique occurrences such as the appearance of additional density peaks in the final wood [104]. This phenomenon is called “false ring” and is quite frequent in juvenile wood of Pinus Pinaster Ait. more impacted by the climatic conditions, as shown in Fig. 15.

Inter-ring density

Variations in inter-ring density, although smaller than variations in intra-ring density, are significant in softwoods (20–25% of mean variation). Two studies provide inter-ring density data for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [89, 90]. A microdensitometric analysis on samples dried at 12% moisture content is used [89]. In the meanwhile, Nicholls claim to measure basic specific gravities (ratio of oven-dry mass to green volume) by drying samples at \({103}^{\circ }C\) during 4 h [90]. However, the study never provides the relative humidity needed to estimate the resulting equilibrium moisture content (EMC).

In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., a decrease in the mean relative density was observed in the first few rings close to the pith followed by a general increase until the 11th to 15th ring, see Figs. 16 and 17 [89, 90]. The value of mean ring relative density is generally lower in the juvenile wood compared to mature wood where it reaches an asymptotic value and is negatively correlated with ring width. A density limit value of around 0.55 is reached in the mature wood zone, as illustrated in Fig. 17 [90]. In the case of Pinus radiata, the asymptotic value is roughly similar to Pinus Pinaster Ait. [96], whilst its value is closer 0.6 in the case of Pinus nigra [84], and closer to 0.45 in the case of Picea abies [105].

A correlation can also be found between latewood relative density and ring width. At a given cambial age, as ring width increases, the latewood relative density decreases, as shown in Fig. 18.

Hygric and thermal properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait.

Moisture transfer model and hygric properties

Water content

A stabilisation of moisture content for Pinus Pinaster Ait. logs stored for several months under immersion of 190% for sapwood rings and 60% for duramen rings was presented [106]. This moisture content gradient is important and can induce high stresses at the sapwood–heartwood transition zone [107]. Water content seems constant in the duramen but variations in moisture content exist in the sapwood with additional variations between initial and final wood (up to 4 times). Furthermore, supplementary variations have been registered up to 50% along the height of the tree for softwoods [57]. Pinus Pinaster Ait. is usually dried up to 12% for its industrial uses. Indeed, French standard indicates that the measurements of deformations must be carried out after drying with a moisture content of 12% [108]. Annex A denotes that in case of unknown service class, the moisture content must be limited to 16% [109]. Annex B states that for an unheated carpentry structure, the moisture content must belong to the range 12%–19% outside and 12%–16% inside [110]. For heated structures, it should belong to 9%–13%. It specifies that for service classes 1, 2 and 3, the water content must be equal to 12%, to 12%–16% and possibly higher than 18%, respectively [111]. The anhydrous mass is obtained when the wood has been dried at 103 \(^{\circ }\)C until the difference in mass between two successive measurements taken 2 h apart is less than 0.1%, according to the French norm [112].

Sorption–desorption isotherm and equilibrium moisture content

For a given temperature and air relative humidity, wood reaches an EMC. For a given temperature, one can trace sorption isotherms that link air relative humidity to the equilibrium water content of the wood. These isotherms are quite independent of the species (unlike the sorption kinetics, which strongly depends on density and anatomical structure) [113]. The FSP is the wood water content (about 30% for Pinus Pinaster Ait.) corresponding to a saturation of cell walls by bound water [40]. Above this point, free water fills the cell cavities by capillarity and its maximum content depends on the porosity of the wood (up to 200% water content) [6]. The wood sorption isotherms depend on the history of thermo-hygric variations.

Pinus Pinaster Ait. sorption model

Several analytical modelling laws exist to express the wood water content H as a function of temperature T and relative humidity h. These models seem to be valid for a temperature range between 0 \(^{\circ }\)C and 100 \(^{\circ }\)C [114]. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., a semi-empiric relationship for adsorption isotherm based on experimental results originated from the Landes region is proposed [113]:

$$\begin{aligned} \text{EMC} = {\frac{\log (Q)}{100 \ \log (B^\prime)}}, \end{aligned}$$
(1)

where Q is defined as

$$\begin{aligned} Q = \dfrac{C^{'}}{A^{'}}-\log {h}, \end{aligned}$$
(2)

whilst parameters \(A^{'}\), \(B^{'}\) and \(C^{'}\) depend upon the temperature as follows

$$\begin{aligned} A^{'} &= -2.86 \ 10^{-5} \ T^2 -1.075 \ 10^{-2} \ T + 10.238, \\ B^{'} &= -5.414 \ 10^{-4} \ T + 1.0134, \\ C^{'} &= 4.976 \ 10^{-6} \ T^2 -2.667 \ 10^{-3} \ T + 0.3546. \end{aligned}$$
(3)

Whilst established thanks to experimental data on Pinus Pinaster Ait., this semi-emperic relationship is not well-adapted to predict the EMC of Pinus Pinaster Ait. and more accurate models such as Hailwood-Horrobin [115] for softwoods can be used.

Hygric transfer model

The physical phenomenon of moisture transfer in wood can be separated into two parts: above and below the FSP. Above FSP, the physical behaviour of water transfer is not yet fully understood. It is generally acknowledged that in this phase, wood presents an evaporation plane. This evaporation divides wood into a wet zone towards the centre and a dry zone towards the exterior of the material. Below the FSP, the material is situated in the hygroscopic range. The water transfer is completely controlled by the diffusion of bound water and water vapour transport. The coefficients of these two types of transfer can be combined into a total diffusion coefficient [116, 117].

One of the most common water transfer model is the transient total diffusion model. This model is based on Fick’s diffusion laws [118, 119]. It provides sufficient accuracy below the FSP (30% in Pinus Pinaster Ait.) contrary to a linear diffusion model. The transient total diffusion model is based on water transport induced by a water content gradient. Clouet used this model in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait. to describe the stress state developing in several configurations of glulam manufactured at green state [6]. Two parameters govern this model: the surface-emission coefficient (SEC) s and the diffusion coefficient D. The estimation of these parameters is fundamental to match experimental results [120]. The coefficient s reflects the external resistance against moisture transport and is influenced by temperature, velocity, viscosity, wood density, moisture content and surface condition [121]. The diffusion coefficient D is function of wood anatomy, temperature and moisture content.

Considering a given volume V of wood characterised by a total external surface S and subject to a given moisture flow \({\textbf{q}}\). The Fick’s first law can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} {\textbf{q}} &= -{\textbf{D}}\nabla H, \\ \dot{{\textbf{q}}} &= -\dot{{\textbf{D}}}\nabla H -{\textbf{D}}\nabla {\dot{H}}, \end{aligned}$$
(4)

with \({\textbf{D}}(H)\) the diffusivity matrix as a function of moisture content H and defined by three diffusion coefficients \(D_{a}(H)\) along the orthotropy directions \(a=L,R,T\) and \({\bar{\nabla }}H\) moisture gradient vector. Those terms are expressed in the local orthotropic coordinate system [122].

The strong formulation of Fick’s second law reads:

$$\begin{aligned} \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial T} = \overrightarrow{\nabla } \cdot \left( {\textbf{D}} \overrightarrow{\nabla H} \right) + Q, \end{aligned}$$
(5)

where \(\frac{\delta H}{\delta t}\) is the rate of moisture variation and Q the moisture content given to the body per time unit. The boundary conditions associated to the above formulæ are usually expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} q_n = s(H) \times (H-H_0), \end{aligned}$$
(6)

with s(H) the SEC, which depends on the moisture content H, whilst \((H-H_0)\) is the initial difference in moisture content between the external surface S and the surrounding environment and \(q_n\) the normal flux towards the exchange surface.

For Pinus Pinaster Ait. \(D_{a}(H) \in {[5;10]} \times 10^{-10}\) \(m^{2}.s^{-1}\) with \(a=R,T\) and \(s(H) \in {[6;8]} \times 10^{-8}\) \(m.s^{-1}\) was experimentally found [6].

Hygroscopic deformation

Hygroscopic deformation is induced by moisture content variations below FSP whose value is approximately 30% (29%–31% for Pinus Pinaster Ait.) [91]. Consequently, the wood swells or shrinks during absorption or desorption phases. Above the FSP, changes in moisture content do not influence the dimensional variations (uncoupled with mechanical behaviour) of wood [123]. Due to the wood orthotropic symmetry, shrinkage and swelling due to moisture content variations strongly depend upon the symmetry axes LRT. These hygroscopic deformations \(\varepsilon _H\) are governed by shrinkage/swelling coefficients \(\alpha _i\) in \(\%/\%\), which describe the dimensional variations \(S_i\) in \(\%\) along the directions \(i=L,R,T\) for a 1\(\%\) water content loss under the FSP:

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _i &= \frac{S_i}{\textrm{FSP}}, \\ \dot{\varvec{\varepsilon }_{\textbf{H}}} &= \mathbf {\alpha } {\dot{H}}, \\ {\varvec{\alpha }}^{T} &= \left[ \alpha _L \ \ \alpha _R \ \ \alpha _T \ \ 0 \ \ 0 \ \ 0 \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(7)

The shrinkage coefficients are always estimated as a relative differences between the dimensions of the anhydrous (0% moisture content) and the green state (30% moisture content). Although the distribution of the shrinkage/swelling coefficients is quite heterogeneous, as reported in Table 6, very often constant coefficients have been used on Pinus Pinaster Ait. studies [6]. The range of values of transverse shrinkage coefficient of \(\alpha _R=\) 0.05–0.20 and \(\alpha _T=\) 0.15–0.35 for Pinus Pinaster Ait. [124] are similar to the ones obtained for Pinus radiata in [96] and different from the ones obtained for a sample of two trees of Picea abies which are \(\alpha _R=\) 0.10–0.25 and \(\alpha _T=\) 0.25–0.40 in [125].

Shrinkage properties are deeply influenced by several wood parameters. A strong correlation for a linear relationship between infra-density and transverse shrinkage (\(\alpha _R\) and \(\alpha _T\)) properties was showed [124]. For Pinus Pinaster Ait., significant variations in the juvenile wood zone for the longitudinal coefficient with some impossible negative values between \(-\)0.003 and 0.003 were observed [90]. In CW, despite an increase in density, \(\alpha _R\) and \(\alpha _T\) remain lower than in NW with a decrease of about \(50\%\) [40]. Whereas \(\alpha _T\) increases in CW up to a value of 0.09, \(\alpha _L\) can reach values around 1\(\%/\%\) in juvenile wood and CW [57]. This shrinkage value cannot be negligible for specific lengths considered in construction. However, CW is rarely identified in the industries for the volumes processed. Along the longitudinal direction, an increase of \(14.9\%\) from top to base of the stem for \(\alpha _T\), regardless of tree individuals were presented [124].

Mechanical properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait.

Several models are available in the literature to describe the behaviour of wood subjected to coupling of mechanical loads and climatic variations [6, 126,127,128,129,130,131]. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., only the mechanical and failure properties are presented in the following of the article.

Elastic properties

Hooke’s Law

Wood is an orthotropic material defined by three main orthotropy R, T, and L axes. The planes RT, TL and LR are planes of orthogonal symmetry for the wood material. Its elastic behaviour is modelled through Hooke’s law whose compliance matrix for wood is uniquely defined via 9 independent elastic constants: three Young’s moduli of elasticity \(E_i\), (\(i=R,T,L\)), three shear moduli \(G_{ij}\) (\(i,j=R,T,L\)), and three Poisson’s ratios \(\nu _{ij}\).

To evaluate softwood mechanical properties at the microscopic scale, a two-scale homogenisation method to determine the constant elastic properties of the cell wall layers from the properties of its constituent polymers before computing wood cell wall lamella properties at 12% moisture content is used [132]. At the macroscopic scale (tree scale), several studies presented their experimental results for Pinus Pinaster Ait. elastic properties: some of these data are reported in Table 7. Cariou et al. presented elastic properties issued from tensile and shear tests on specimens visually chosen with a straight grain angle, constant spacing growth rings, high radius of curvature, and without knots [133]. The shear mechanical properties from clear wood specimens extracted from a 74-year-old Pinus Pinaster Ait. tree were measured [134, 135]. The properties are evaluated through three different shear tests: the Iosipescu test, the off-axis test, and the Arcan test. Santos et al. presented the Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratios as results of tensile test [136]. The radial modulus of elasticity thanks to 3-point bending tests was evaluated [137]. The longitudinal Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratios for several specimens of clear wood, with variability in density and growth rings width, obtained from tensile and compression tests parallel and transversal to the grain, shear tests and flexural tests were also evaluated [138]. Finally, an anisotropic-based method resting on digital image correlation and tensile tests to evaluate elastic properties in the transverse plane of specimens was used [139].

In comparison with other softwood species, the Young’s moduli of Pinus Pinaster Ait. are similar to the properties of Pinus radiata [96], whilst the longitudinal Young modulus ((11.4, 17.8) GPa in Table 7 in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait.) is lower in the case of Pinus sylvestris and is comprised between 7.4–7.9 for samples between 30- and 60-year old [140] and in the case of Picea abies with values comprised between 11.0 and 15.0 GPa [141]. In the case of the shear moduli of elasticity, the properties of Pinus abies are much lower than the ones of the species Picea pinaster Ait., with properties equal to \(G_{RT} = 33.4\) MPa, \(G_{TL}=681\) MPa, and \(G_{LR}=702\) MPa [142].

Variability of elastic properties

As all natural materials, Pinus Pinaster Ait. is characterised by a a significant variability of elastic properties which is most prominent intra-tree [143]. A model was established for predicting the elastic properties of hardwood and softwood species as a function of their density d [7]. The following equations describe the elastic properties (MPa) of standard softwoods.

$$\begin{aligned} {E_L}& = 13100+41700 (d-0.45), \ \frac{{E_R}}{{\nu _{RT}}} = 20250+5280 (d-0.45), \ {G_{RT}} = 83.6 + 228 (d-0.45), \\ {E_R} &= 1000+2370 (d-0.45), \ \frac{{E_L}}{{\nu _{LR}}} = 34200+117000 (d-0.45), \ {G_{LT}} = 745 + 989 (d-0.45), \\ {E_T}& =636+1910 (d-0.45), \ \frac{{E_T}}{{\nu _{LT}}} =30800+101000 (d-0.45), \ {G_{LR}} =861 + 2080 (d-0.45).\end{aligned}$$
(8)

In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., relationships between infra-density \(G_b\) and shear modulus (MPa), albeit with relatively low coefficients of determination \(R^{2}\) were introduced [134, 135]. For instance, the shear moduli is given as a function of \(G_b \in [0.53;0.63]\) through the following empirical formulæ[134]:

$$\begin{aligned} {G_{LR}}&=2402 G_b \ {\rm with} \ R^{2}=0.711, \\ {G_{LT}} &=2072 G_b \ { with} \ R^{2}=0.255, \\ {G_{RT}}&=495 G_b \ { with} \ R^{2}=0.307. \end{aligned}$$
(9)

Further relationships were derived with \(G_b \in [0.57;0.69]\) [135]:

$$\begin{aligned} {G_{LR}}&=500 G_b + 1020 \ {\rm with} \ R^{2}=0.050, \\ {G_{LT}}&=960 G_b + 500 {\rm with} \ R^{2}=0.056, \\ {G_{RT}}& =600 G_b + 160 \ {\rm with} \ R^{2}=0.108. \end{aligned}$$
(10)

The elastic properties are also influenced by variations of moisture content below the FSP. Above this threshold, it is considered that variations in moisture content do not influence the elastic properties [126].

Water content influence on wood elastic properties is directly derived from polymers’ behaviour composing the cell walls of wood [6]. A state of the art is provided: variations of 15%–20% for elastic properties have been recorded for a variation in water content of 12%–20% [144]. The evolution of elastic and shear moduli over a wide range of water content was analysed [7]. Between 0% and 6% of water content, all moduli undergo a slight increase around 5% before decreasing linearly for water content increasing from 6% to 20%. Finally, a stabilisation of elastic properties occurs around the FSP. An empirical formulæfor computing the elastic \(E_i^{H}\) and shear moduli \(G_j^{H}\) (MPa) as a function of water content H (%) was proposed [7].

Finally, temperature also influences elastic properties. A decrease in elastic moduli when the temperature was increased from 20 \(^{\circ }\)C to 50 \(^{\circ }\)C was observed [145]. Moreover, mechanical properties depend on the position of the sample in individuals of softwoods [141]. Along the radial direction, elastic properties tend to increase with the distance from the pith r. In the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait., an increase in elastic moduli of 99% between samples at 10% and 90% of total distance from the pith for 50-year-old trees which can be explained by the presence of juvenile wood in the first rings closer to the pith was recorded [1, 146]. Variations between 55% and 65% in longitudinal Young’s modulus between juvenile and mature wood without defects were observed [3]. In the duramen, no consequent variations have been measured between heartwood and sapwood in Pinus Pinaster Ait. [68].

Regarding the longitudinal direction, a decrease in elastic moduli with tree height for two softwood species was observed [141]. As for Pinus Pinaster Ait., a decrease in longitudinal Young’s modulus of elasticity with tree height was noted [1]. It can be mostly explained by the juvenile wood higher proportion in the highest part of trees at the proximity of the living crown and branches, as shown in Fig. 19.

Table 1 Knots elastic properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. [37]
Table 2 Pinus Pinaster Ait. mean anatomical parameters issued from several references

The defects such as RW and knots strongly influence the elastic properties. Singularities, like knots and resin pockets play inclusion roles because their properties are different from the wood matrix, as reported in Table 1. Silviculture plays an important role in the wood growth and properties, as illustrated in Fig. 19. The effect of different silvicultural scenarios on Pinus Pinaster Ait. elastic properties was presented [1]. The three scenarios are a high-quality scenario with long rotation and moderate growth, a traditional rotation scenario and a short rotation scenario with clear-cuts [1]. For example, decreasing rotation time leads to an increase in the proportion of juvenile wood and thus to a decrease in elastic properties. In the case of growth rate variation in softwoods, species with an abrupt transition between initial and final wood, such as Pinus Pinaster Ait., do not show changes in their elastic properties.

Strength properties

Definition

The mechanical properties most commonly used to evaluate wood failure are the limit stress in bending, ultimate stress values in compression, tension and shear strength parallel and perpendicular to the wood grain [147]. Wood strength is different in tension and compression. This difference is explained by the distinct behaviour of the tubular elements constituting the wood microstructure: they show micro-buckling in compression and brittle failure in traction. Table8 regroups the Pinus Pinaster Ait. strength properties at the macroscopic scale available in the literature and expressed in terms of modulus of rupture (MOR); ultimate axial stress \(\sigma _{i,\tau }^u\) (\(i=R,T,L\)) in both traction (\(\tau =t\)) and compression (\(\tau =c\)); limit shear stresses in the three characteristic planes, i.e. LR, LT and RT, in terms of stress level at which the first crack onset occurs, i.e., \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,co}}\), of the ultimate shear stress, i.e., \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,u}}\), and of the shear strength, i.e. \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,s}}\).

Table 3 Pinus Pinaster Ait. tree height and diameter for issued from several references
Table 4 Pinus Pinaster Ait. (ssp. Atlantica) ring width issued from several references
Table 5 Pinus Pinaster ssp. Atlantica intra-ring relative density (air dry density—the ratio of mass to volume of wood conditioned to a moisture content of 12% relative to water density) for earlywood and latewood. Mean relative density d; Latewood LW; Earlywood EW; Latewood relative density \(d^{LW}\); Earlywood relative density \(d^{EW}\); Standard deviation for Latewood relative density \(\sigma _{d^{LW}}\); Standard deviation for Earlywood relative density \(\sigma _{d^{EW}}\); Latewood percentage \(\%^{LW}\); Standard deviation for latewood percentage \(\sigma _{\%^{LW}}\)

Experimental results were obtained through

  • modified Arcan test [148];

  • vibratory ranking method [143];

  • 4-points bending tests which rely on French standards [1, 149,150,151,152,153];

  • axial compression tests [91].

Cruz et al. extracted the strength properties from the Portuguese norm [154, 155]. Balmori et al. referred to the European norm and to two Spanish norms [5, 156,157,158].

Variability of strength properties

Strength properties fluctuate similarly to the elastic properties depending on the position of the sample in the log and the climatic conditions. As far as the radial direction is concerned, variations of strength properties follow the same tendencies as elastic properties [1, 141]. For Pinus Pinaster Ait., an increase of strength properties proportional to distance from the pith was registered [146]. Notably, from samples extracted from 10% to 90% of total radius, an increase of 50% to 60% has been observed for bending strength and an increase of 39% to 48% for compression strength parallel to the grain with a stabilised constant reached for both properties at 50% total radius. Finally, for the tensile strength perpendicular to the grain, a first increase of 23% has been measured between 10% and 50% total radius before a second increase of 33% between 50% and 90% total radius, as illustrated in Fig. 20.

Table 6 Pinus Pinaster Ait. shrinkage properties (tangential \(\alpha _T\), radial \(\alpha _R\), longitudinal \(\alpha _L\)) issued from several references
Table 7 Mean reference elastic properties, i.e. Young’s moduli \(E_L\), \(E_R\), and \(E_T\), shear moduli \(G_{RT}\), \(G_{TL}\), and \(G_{LR}\), and Poisson’s ratios \(\nu _{RT}\), \(\nu _{TL}\), and \(\nu _{LR}\) in the local cylindrical reference system for Pinus Pinaster Ait. as a function of several corresponding relative densities d and moisture content of measurement H [\(\%\)] extracted from several studies
Table 8 Reference strength properties expressed in terms of modulus of rupture (MOR); ultimate axial stress \(\sigma _{i,\tau }^u\) (\(i=R,T,L\)) in both traction (\(\tau =t\)) and compression (\(\tau =c\)); limit shear stresses in the three characteristic planes, i.e., LR, LT and RT, in terms of stress level at which the first crack onset occurs, i.e., \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,co}}\), of the ultimate shear stress, i.e., \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,u}}\), and of the shear strength, i.e., \(\sigma _{\textrm{s,s}}\) for Pinus Pinaster Ait. extracted from several studies

Strength properties also vary along the longitudinal direction [141]. A reduction of strength properties in the higher portions of a tree was confirmed [1]. Reductions of 12%, 32% and 23% for bending strength on samples extracted, respectively, from 0% to 65% of the total tree height and at a distance of 10%, 50% and 90% of total radius from the pith were registered [146]. They found reductions of 29% and 24% for the compression strength parallel to the grain and 30% for the tensile strength perpendicular to the grain at the same height for sampling distance from the pith of 50% and 90% of the total radius, as shown in Fig. 21.

In the juvenile wood, strength properties are lower compared to adult wood in softwood species. This degradation of mechanical strength in juvenile wood could be explained by a lower cell wall thickness and bigger micro-fibril angles. In Pinus Pinaster Ait., average variations of 30% in bending strength, 20% in compression parallel to the grain and 15% in tension strengths perpendicular to the grain, with respect to adult wood were reported [146].

In CW, tensile and impact strengths are reduced [37]. Knots and resin pockets greatly influence the tree mechanical strength and quality. The geometrical characteristics of a knot (size and position) and the deviation of the grain slope imply a decrease in the bending strength of wood beams [148].

In the case of strength properties oriented differently from the main orthotropic directions of the material, an improved version of the Hagen–Hankinson–Kollman’s formula, which estimates strength properties for Pinus Pinaster Ait. oriented differently from wood grain angle was presented:

$$\begin{aligned} R_{\theta }=\frac{R_{0}R_{90}}{R_{0}\sin {\theta }^{n} + R_{90}\cos {\theta }^{n}}, \end{aligned}$$
(11)

where \(R_{\theta }\) is the generic strength property oriented at \(\theta\) with respect to the wood fibre [37, 56, 159]. n is an empirical coefficient, whilst \(R_0\) and \(R_{90}\) are the strength properties parallel and perpendicular to the wood fibre direction, respectively. The values of n and of the ratio \(\dfrac{R_{90}}{R_0}\) for different strength properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. are not available in literature. As well, the influence of variations in moisture content on strength properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. is not available in literature.

Finally, density and temperature also influence the strength properties. Few information is available in the case of Pinus Pinaster Ait.. An affine relationship between relative density and tensile strength along the fibre direction was presented [3]. As well, relationships between the infradensity \(G_b\) and shear strengths (MPa) with relatively low coefficients of determination \(R^{2}\), which apply for values of \(G_b \in (0.57, \ 0.69)\) were introduced [135]:

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{LR} &=0.57 G_b + 15.44 \ {\rm with} \ R^{2} = 0, \\ \sigma _{LT}& =44.09 G_b + 15.02 \ {\rm with} \ R^{2} = 0.274, \\ \sigma _{RT} & =8.39 G_b + 0.80 \ {\rm with} \ R^{2} = 0.212. \end{aligned}$$
(12)

Conclusions

This literature survey regroups a wide variety of information extracted from the scientific literature on the properties of one species deeply rooted into the Landes of Gascogne: Pinus Pinaster Ait. (ssp. Atlantica). First, by presenting the propagation of this species throughout History to regroup only the information related to the particular “Atlantica” subspecies. Then, by displaying the multi-scale organisation and natural variability of wood to expose its complexity. Finally, by regrouping the thermal, hygrical and mechanical properties needed to model wood behaviour. This review aims to enhance accuracy of future research works on Pinus Pinaster Ait. and draw a distinction with others softwoods. Moreover, this work highlights the lack of information of several properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. especially about variability at the macroscopic scale (intra-tree). It is of enormous significance in both industrial domain and ecological interest to provide sufficient cognizance in xylology and properties of Pinus Pinaster Ait. To improve our understanding and master this local richness, experimental and numerical studies should be held to further estimate and deepen our knowledge of Pinus Pinaster Ait. properties at several scales.

Availability of data and materials

The author confirms that all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

SDGs:

Sustainable development goals

RW:

Reaction wood

CW:

Compression wood

MFA:

Angle of micro-fibrils

IADF:

Inter-annual density fluctuation

NW:

Normal wood

EMC:

Equilibrium moisture content

SEC:

Surface-emission coefficient

MOR:

Modulus of rupture

References

  1. Moreau J (2010) Impact de pratiques sylvicoles intensives sur les propriétés du bois de pin maritime. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. http://www.theses.fr/2010BOR14200

  2. Layton RJ, Arduin RH, Yazdeen H, Pommier R, Sonnemann G (2021) Material flow analysis to evaluate supply chain evolution and management: an example focused on maritime pine in the Landes de Gascogne forest, France. Sustainability 13(8):4378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanz F, Latour S, Neves M, Bastet E, Pischedda D, Piñeiro G, Gauthier T, Lesbats J, Plantier C, Marques A, Lanvin JD, Santos JA, Touza M, Pedras F, Parrot J, Reuling D, Faria C (2020) Industrial applications of Pinus pinaster. Center of Innovations and Technological Services of Madeira in Galicia, founded by development of technological industrial quality of Galicia edition, Madeira, Spain

  4. Ormarsson S, Dahlblom O, Petersson H (2000) A numerical study of the shape stability of sawn timber subjected to moisture variation: Part 3: influence of annual ring orientation. Wood Sci Technol 34(3):207–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balmori JA, Basterra LA, Acuña L (2020) Internal GFRP reinforcement of low-grade maritime pine duo timber beams. Materials 13(3):571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Clouet B (2014) Comportement hydromécanique d’assemblages bois collés à l’état vert : approches expérimentale et numérique. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

  7. Guitard D (1987) Mécanique du matériau bois et composites - préface de H Polge. Collection Nabla, Editions Cépaduès, Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aiton W, Bauer FA, Sowerby J, Ehret GD, Nicol G (1789) Hortus Kewensis, or, A catalogue of the plants cultivated in the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew, volume v.1. Printed for George Nicol, Bookseller to his Majesty, London, UK. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/23432

  9. Baradat P (1986) Pin maritime. Pinus pinaster Ait. Rev For Fr AgroParisTech 38:121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desole L (1960) Il Pinus pinaster Sol, Sardegna. Giorn Bot Ital 67(1–2):24–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263506009428091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Romao C (1997) Manuel d’interprétation des habitats de l’union européenne : version EUR 15. Commission européenne, Direction Générale “Environnement, Sécurité Nucléaire et Protection Civile”, Bruxelles, Belgium

  12. Baeta Neves CM (1953) Noía sobre a fasciação do pinheiro bravo (Pinus pinaster Sol. ex Ait) na Ilha da Madeira. Anais Do Instituto Superior De Aagronomia: 103–108

  13. Museum national d’Histoire naturelle (2022) Pinus pinaster Aiton, 1789 - Pin maritime, Pin mésogéen, Pin des Landes. https://inpn.mnhn.fr/espece/cd_nom/113689

  14. Figueiral I, Bettencourt AMS (2004) Middle/Late Bronze Age plant communities and their exploitation in the Cávado Basin (NW Portugal) as shown by charcoal analysis: the significance and co-occurrence of Quercus (deciduous) - Fabaceae. Veg Hist Archaeobot 13(4):219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-004-0040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Da Fonte L, Ramos A, Tereso J (2015) Ecological interpretation of a Pinus pinaster Aiton archaeological assemblage from the Sabor valley, Northeastern Portugal. In Conference: IJUP, (2015) Long Term Ecological Research at Baixo Sabor (LTER Baixo Sabor). Porto, Portugal

  16. Seabra L, Santos F, Vaz FC, Leite J, Tereso JP (2020) Crops behind closed walls: fortified storage at Castelinho in the Late Iron Age of NW Iberia. J Archaeol Sci Rep 30:102200

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubiales J, Garcia Amorena I, García Álvarez S, Morla C (2009) Anthracological evidence suggests naturalness of Pinus pinaster in inland southwestern Iberia. Plant Ecol 200:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9439-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morales-Molino C, Postigo-Mijarra J, Morla C, García-Antón M (2012) Long-term persistence of Mediterranean pine forests in the Duero Basin (central Spain) during the Holocene: The case of Pinus pinaster Aiton. Holocene 22:561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kämpf Binelli E, Gholz HL, Duryea ML (2006) Chapter 4: Plant succession and disturbances in the urban forest ecosystem. In Restoring the urban forest ecosystem. University of Florida, Institute of food and agricultural sciences edition, Florida, USA

  20. López-Sáez JA, Pérez-Díaz S, Galop D, Alba-Sánchez F, Abel-Schaad D (2019) A late antique vegetation history of the western mediterranean in context. Environment and Society in the Long Late Antiquity. Brill, Leyde, Netherlands, pp 83–104

  21. López-Sáez JA, López-Merino L, Alba-Sánchez F, Pérez-Díaz S, Abel-Schaad D, Carrióon J (2010) Late Holocene ecological history of Pinus pinaster forests in the Sierra de Gredos of central Spain. Plant Ecol 206:195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chevalier A (1925) Le Pin maritime des Landes. J Agric Trop Bot Appl 5(48):604–614

    Google Scholar 

  23. Havel JJ (1968) The potential of the Northern swan coastal plain for Pinus pinaster Ait. plantations. Perth : [Forests Dept. W.A.] 76

  24. Donovan O (2020) Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) in Western Australia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDY_cs9_S68

  25. Sweet GB, Thulin IJ (1962) Provenance of Pinus pinaster Ait – A five-year progress report on a trial at woodhill New-Zealand. NZ J 8(4):570–586

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the Southern hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21(5):511–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alegria C, Roque N, Albuquerque T, Fernandez P (2021) Modelling maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) spatial distribution and productivity in Portugal: tools for forest management. Forests 12(3):368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Durrant T, Boca R, Maianti P, Liberta G, Jacome Felix Oom D, Branco A, De Rigo D, Suarez-Moreno M, Ferrari D, Roglia E, Scionti N, Broglia M, Onida M, Tistan A, Loffler P (2023) Forest Fires in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. D, Middle East and North Africa. https://doi.org/10.2760/348120

  29. Prieto-Recio C, Martín-García J, Bravo F, Diez J (2015) Unravelling the associations between climate, soil properties and forest management in Pinus pinaster decline in the Iberian peninsula. For Ecol Manag 35674–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Connor S, Araújo J, Boski T, Gomes A, Gomes S, Leira M, Freitas M, Andrade C, Morales-Molino C, Franco-Múgica F, Akindola R, Vannière B (2021) Drought, fire and grazing precursors to large-scale pine forest decline. Divers Distribut. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Szymczak S, Häusser M, Garel E, Santoni S, Huneau F, Knerr I, Trachte K, Bendix J, Bräuning A (2020) How do Mediterranean pine trees respond to drought and precipitation events along an elevation gradient? Forests 11(7):758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pardos M, del Río M, Pretzsch H, Jactel H, Bielak K, Bravo F, Brazaitis G, Defossez E, Engel M, Godvod K, Jacobs K, Jansone L, Jansons A, Morin X, Nothdurft A, Oreti L, Ponette Q, Pach M, Riofrío J, Ruíz-Peinado R, Tomao A, Uhl E, Calama R (2021) The greater resilience of mixed forests to drought mainly depends on their composition: analysis along a climate gradient across Europe. For Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vergarechea M, Calama R, Pretzsc H, Alday JG, Del Río M (2021) Short- and long-term growth response to climate in mixed and monospecific forests of Pinus pinea and Pinus pinaster. Eur J Forest Res 140(2):387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Barrio-Anta M, Castedo-Dorado F, Cámara-Obregón A, López-Sánchez CA (2020) Predicting current and future suitable habitat and productivity for Atlantic populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Spain. Ann For Sci 77(2):41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00941-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bogino SM, Bravo F (2008) Growth response of Pinus pinaster Ait. to climatic variables in central Spanish forests. Ann For Sci 65:506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tapias R, Gil L, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Pardos JA (2001) Canopy seed banks in Mediterranean pines of south-eastern Spain: a comparison between Pinus halepensis Mill., Pinus pinaster Ait., Pinus nigra Arn. and Pinus pinea L. J Ecol 89:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grazide C (2014) Une modélisation de la résistance en flexion du pin maritime utilisé en construction. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

  38. Pot D, Chantre G, Rozenberg P, Rodrigues J, Jones G, Pereira H, Hannrup B, Cahalan C, Plomion C (2002) Genetic control of pulp and timber properties in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Ann For Sci 59:563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lundqvist SO, Hansson AA, Olsson L (2007) SilviScan measurements on maritime pine - French samples cut perpendicular to the fibres. Technical report number 326, STFI-Packforsk 333–359

  40. Brémaud I, Ruelle J, Thibaut A, Thibaut B (2013) Changes in viscoelastic vibrational properties between compression and normal wood: roles of microfibril angle and of lignin. Holzforschung 67(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Donaldson LA (1992) Within-and between-tree variation in microfibril angle in Pinus radiata. NZ J Forest Sci 22(1):77–86

    Google Scholar 

  42. Auty D, Gardiner B, Achim A, Moore J, Cameron A (2013) Models for predicting microfibril angle variation in scots pine. Ann For Sci 70(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilkinson S, Ogée J, Domec JC, Rayment M, Wingate L (2015) Biophysical modelling of intra-ring variations in tracheid features and wood density of Pinus pinaster trees exposed to seasonal droughts. Tree Physiol 35(3):305–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Carvalho A, Nabais A, Vieira C, Rossi J, Campelo S (2015) Plastic response of tracheids in Pinus pinaster in a water-limited environment: adjusting lumen size instead of wall thickness. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0136305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vieira J, Campelo F, Rossi S, Campelo F, Freitas H, Nabais C (2014) Xylogenesis of Pinus pinaster under a mediterranean climate. Ann For Sci 71:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. De Micco V, Saurer M, Aronne G, Tognetti R, Cherubini P (2007) Improvement of Pinus pinaster Ait. elite trees selection by combining near infrared spectroscopy and genetic tools. Holzforschung 28(1):61–74

    Google Scholar 

  47. Da Silva Perez D, Guillemain A, Alazard P, Plomion C, Rozenberg P, Carlos Rodrigues J, Alves A, Chantre G (2007) Variations of wood anatomy and \(\delta ^{13}\)C within-tree rings of coastal Pinus pinaster showing intra-annual density fluctuations. IAWA J 28:611–622

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ballesteros JA, Stoffel M, Bodoque JM, Bollschweiler M, Hitz O, Díez-Herrero A (2013) Changes in wood anatomy in tree rings of Pinus pinaster Ait. following wounding by flash floods. Tree-Ring Res 66(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Riesco Muñoz G, Barrio Anta M (2010) Physical properties of thinning wood in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): case study. Eur J Forest Res 129:1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Campelo F, Vieira J, Nabais C (2013) Tree-ring growth and intra-annual density fluctuations of Pinus pinaster responses to climate: does size matter? Trees 27:763–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0831-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vieira J, Campelo F, Nabais C (2009) Age-dependent responses of tree-ring growth and intra-annual density fluctuations of Pinus pinaster to Mediterranean climate. Trees 23:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0273-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nabais C, Campelo F, Vieira J, Cherubini P (2014) Climatic signals of tree-ring width and intra-annual density fluctuations in Pinus pinaster and Pinus pinea along a latitudinal gradient in Portugal. Forestry 87:598–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hernández-Alonso H, Madrigual-Gonzáles J, Fernando S (2021) Differential growth responses in Pinus nigra, Pinus pinaster and Pinus sylvestris to the main patterns of climatic variability in the western Mediterranean. For Ecol Manage 483:118921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Häusser M, Aryal S, Barth JAC, Bendix J, Garel E, van Geldern R, Huneau F, Juhlke TR, Knerr I, Santoni S, Szymczak S, Trachte K, Bräuning A (2023) Xylem formation patterns from Mediterranean to subalpine climate conditions reveal high growth plasticity of pine species on Corsica. Trees 37:1027–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Olivar J, Bogino S, Heinrich S, Bravo F (2015) Changes in climate-growth relationships and IADF formation over time of pine species (Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster and Pinus sylvestris) in Mediterranean environments. For Syst 24(1):2171–9845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Viguier J (2015) Classement mécanique des bois de structure. Prise en compte des singularités dans la modélisation du comportement mécanique. Phd thesis, Université de Lorraine, Metz, France

  57. Jodin P (1994) Le bois matériau d’ingénierie textes rassemblés par Philippe Jodin. Association for research on wood in Lorraine école nationale du génie rural, des eaux et des forêts, Nancy, France

  58. Polge H, Illy G (1967) Observations sur l’anisotropie du pin maritime des Landes. Ann Sci For 24(3):205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Berthier S (2001) Effets des sollicitations aérodynamiques sur la croissance et le développement du pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait. ) : influence sur la morphogenèse aérienne et racinaire, et sur la formation du bois de cœur. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

  60. Bouffier L, Raffin A, Kremer A (2008) Evolution of genetic variation for selected traits in successive breeding populations of maritime pine. Heredity 101:156–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Durel CE (1992) Gain génétiques attendus après sélection sur index en seconde génération d’amélioration du pin maritime. Rev For Fr AgroParisTech 44(4):341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zobel BJ, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  63. GIS (2002) Genetic breeding of the maritime pine in Aquitaine. GIS Work Report PG édition, Bordeaux, France

    Google Scholar 

  64. Radi M, Castéra P (1992) Qualification de la forme de deux pins maritimes en liaison avec la structure de leur bois. Ann Sci For 49(2):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Alteyrac J (2005) Influence de la densité de peuplement et de la hauteur dans l’arbre sur les propriétés physico-mécaniques du bois d’épinette noire (Picea Mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.). Phd thesis, Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval, Laval, Québec

  66. Dumail JF (1995) Caractéristiques physiques et mécaniques du bois juvénile de pin maritime. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. https://hal.inrae.fr/tel-02852693

  67. Sauter U, Mutz R, Munro B (1999) Determining juvenile-mature wood transition in scots pine using latewood density. Wood Fiber Sci 31(4):416–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Berthier S, Kokutse AD, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2001) Irregular heartwood formation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): consequences for biomechanical and hydraulic tree functioning. Ann Bot 87(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Taylor AM, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ (2002) Heartwood formation and natural durability–a review. Wood Fiber Sci 2:587–611

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jpn J Ecol 14(4):133–139

    Google Scholar 

  71. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form; the pipe model I. Theory. Jpn J Ecol 14(3):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hillis WE (1987) Heartwood and tree exudates. Volume 4 of Springer Series in Wood Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  73. Pinto I, Pereira H, Usenius A (2004) Heartwood and sapwood development within maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stems. Trees 18:284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Knapic S, Pereira H (2005) Within-tree variation of heartwood and ring width in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). For Ecol Manag 210(1–3):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gjerdrum P (2003) Heartwood in relation to age and growth rate in Pinus sylvestris L. in Scandinavia. Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.4.413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Knapic S, Oliveira V, Makkonen M, Pinto-Seppa I, Pereira H (2014) Circumferential variation of heartwood and sapwood in maritime pine stems. Eur J Forest Res 58(195):31–44

    Google Scholar 

  77. Giroud G (2005) Caractérisation de la proportion de bois d’aubier et de duramen chez le bouleau à papier (Betula Papyrifera Marsh.). PhD thesis, University of Laval, Laval, Quebec

  78. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer series in wood science. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA

  79. Stokes A, Berthier S (2000) Irregular heartwood formation in Pinus pinaster Ait. is related to eccentric, radial, stem growth. For Ecol Manag 135:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Plomion C, Pionneau C, Brach J, Costa P, Baillères H (2000) Compression wood-responsive proteins in developing xylem of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait). Plant Physiol 123(3):959–969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Bourke L (2004) Growth trends and water use efficiency of Pinus pinaster Ait. in response to historical climate and groundwater trends on the gnangara mound, western australia. Phd thesis, School of Natural Science Faculty of Communications, Health and Science Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia

  82. Heuret P, Meredieu C, Coudurier T, Courdier F, Barthélémy D (2006) Ontogenetic trends in the morphological features of main stem annual shoots of Pinus pinaster (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 90(11):1577–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Beniušienė L, Petrauskas E, Aleinikovas M, Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė I, Beniušis R, Šilinskas B (2021) Norway spruce stem parameters in sites with different stand densities in lithuanian hemiboreal forest. Forests 12:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Dias A, Gaspar MJ, Carvalho A, Pires J, Lima-Brito J, Silva ME, Louzada JL (2018) Within- and between-tree variation of wood density components in Pinus nigra at six sites in Portugal. Ann For Sci 75:58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ogana FN, Gorgoso-Varela JJ (2020) A nonlinear mixed-effects tree height prediction model: application to Pinus pinaster Ait. in northwest Spain. Trees For People 1:100003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Nunes L, Patrício M, Tomé J, Tomé M (2011) Modeling dominant height growth of maritime pine in Portugal using GADA methodology with parameters depending on soil and climate variables. Ann For Sci 68:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rubio-Cuadrado A, Bravo-Oviedo A, Mutke S, Del Río M (2018) Climate effects on growth differ according to height and diameter alongthe stem in Pinus pinaster Ait. iForest 11:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Anjos O, Margarido M, Pinto I, Usenius A, Pereira H (2010) Variation of grow ring width in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). In Conference: WCTE 2010 World Conference on Timber Engineering, Trentino, Italy, volume 4, pp 765–766

  89. Gaspar MJ, Louzada J, Silva M, Aguiar A, Almeida MH (2008) Age trends in genetic parameters of wood density components in 46 half-sibling families of Pinus pinaster. Can J For Res 38(6):1470–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Nicholls JWP, Dadswell HE, Perry DH (1963) Assessment of wood qualities for tree breeding. II. In Pinus pinaster Ait from western Australia. Silvae Genet 12(4):105–110

    Google Scholar 

  91. Burgers A (2016) Caractérisations physico-mécaniques de bois “sans défauts” pour la conception mécanique : application aux pins de la région méditerranéenne française. Phd thesis, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France

  92. Louzada JLPC (2000) Variação Fenotípica e Genética em características estruturais na Madeira de Pinus pinaster Ait. O comprimento das fibras e a densidade até aos 80 anos de idade das árvores. Parametros genéticos na evolução juvenil - adulto das componentes da densidade da Madeira. Série Didáctica - Ciências Aplicadas, 143. UTAD, utad edition, Porto, Portugal

  93. Louzada JLPC (2003) Genetic correlations between wood density components in Pinus pinaster Ait. Ann For Sci 60(3):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Louzada J, Fonseca F (2002) The heritability of wood density components in Pinus pinaster Ait. and the implications for tree breeding. Ann For Sci 59:867–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Keller R, Azoeuf P, Hoslin R (1974) Détermination de l’angle de la fibre torse d’arbres sur pied à l’aide d’un traceur radioactif. Ann Sci For 31(3):161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Cown D (2005) Moisture-related distortion of boards and wooden products of radiata pine: comparison with Norway spruce. Wood Fiber Sci 37:424–436

    Google Scholar 

  97. Säll H (2002) Spiral grain in Norway spruce. Phd thesis, Acta Wexionensia, Växjö University, Växjö, No 22/2002. ISSN: 1404-4307 ISBN: 91-7636-356-2

  98. Jyske T, Mäkinen T, Saranpää P (2008) Wood density within Norway spruce stems. Silva Fenn 42(3):439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Larson PR (1994) The vascular cambium – development and structure. Springer Series in Wood Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  100. Franceschini T, Longuetaud F, Bontemps JD, Bouriaud O, Caritey BD, Leban JM (2013) Effect of ring width, cambial age, and climatic variables on the within-ring wood density profile of Norway spruce Picea abies L. Karst. Trees 27:913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Sánchez-Vargas N, Sanchez L, Rozenberg P (2007) Plastic and adaptive response to weather events: a pilot study in a maritime pine tree ring. Can J For Res 37:2090–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Polge H (1963) Une nouvelle méthode de détermination de la texture du bois : l’analyse densitométrique de clichés radiographiques. Annales de l’Ecole Nationale des Eaux et Forêts et de la Station de Recherches et Expériences Forestières 20(4):533–581

    Google Scholar 

  103. Polge H (1966) Établissement des courbes de variation de la densité du bois par exploration densitométrique de radiographies d’échantillons prélevés à la tarière sur des arbres vivants : applications dans les domaines technologique et physiologique. Ann Sci For 23(1):1–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Vieira J, Campelo F, Rossi S, Carvalho A, Freitas H, Nabais C (2015) Adjustment capacity of maritime pine cambial activity in drought-prone environments. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Gryc V, Horáček P (2007) Variability in density of spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) wood with the presence of reaction wood. J For Sci 53(3):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Castéra P (2004) Plateforme expérimentale sur la conservation longue durée du pin maritime par voie humide. Project report, INRA, Pierotton

    Google Scholar 

  107. Florisson S, Ormarsson S, Vessby J (2019) A numerical study of the effect of green-state moisture content on stress development in timber boards during drying. Wood Fiber Sci 51:41–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. En NF, 13307–1, (2007) Ébauches et profilés semi-finis en bois pour usages non structurels - Partie 1: exigences. Afnor, France

  109. En NF, 14220, (2007) Bois et matériaux à base de bois dans les fenêtres extérieures, les vantaux de portes extérieures et les dormants de portes extérieures - Exigences et spécifications. Afnor, France

  110. En NF, 942, (2007) Bois dans les menuiseries - Exigences générales. Afnor, France

  111. XP CEN, TS 13307–2, (2010) Ébauches et profilés semi-finis en bois lamellé-collés et assemblés par entures multiples pour usages non structurels - Partie 2: contrôle de production. Afnor, France

  112. En NF, 13183–1, (2002) Teneur en humidité dúne pièce de bois scié - partie 1: Détermination par la méthode de dessication. Afnor, France

  113. Mouchot N (2002) Etude expérimentale et modélisation des transports diffusionnels de l’eau dans le domaine hygroscopique des bois de hêtre et d’épicéa. PhD thesis, Université Henry Poincaré, Nancy, France

  114. Simpson WT (1973) Predicting equilibrium moisture content of wood by mathematical models. Wood Fiber 5(1):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  115. Vidal Bastías M, Cloutier A (2005) Evaluation of wood sorption models for high temperatures. Cienc Tecn 7(3):145–158

    Google Scholar 

  116. Pang S, Keey RB, Langrish TAG (1995) Modelling the temperature profiles within boards during the high-temperature drying of Pinus radiata timber: the influence of airflow reversals. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38(2):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Rémond R, Perré P, Mougel E (2005) Using the concept of thin dry layer to explain the evolution of thickness, temperature, and moisture content during convective drying of Norway spruce boards. Drying Technol 23:249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Fick A (1855) Ueber diffusion. Ann Phys 170(1):59–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Perré P (2014) The proper use of mass diffusion equation in drying modelling: from simple configurations to non-fickian behaviours. In 19th International Drying Symposium IDS’2014, Lyon, France

  120. Sherwood TK (1929) The drying of solids I. Ind Eng Chem 21(1):12–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Perré P (2007) Fundamentals of wood drying. European COST. A.R. BO, LOR, Nancy, France

    Google Scholar 

  122. Phan NA (2016) Simulation of time-dependent crack propagation in a quasi-brittle material under relative humidity variations based on cohesive zone approach: application to wood. Phd thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

  123. Navi P, Heger F (2005) Comportement thermo-hydromécanique du bois: applications technologiques et dans les structures. PPUR presses polytechniques, Lozan, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  124. Dumail J, Castéra P (1997) Transverse shrinkage in maritime pine juvenile wood. Wood Sci Technol 31(4):251–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Bengtsson C (2001) Variation of moisture induced movements in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Ann For Sci 58(5):568–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Ormarsson S, Dahlblom O, Petersson H (1998) A numerical study of the shape stability of sawn timber subjected to moisture variation. Part 1: Theory. Wood Sci Technol 32(5):325–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Santaoja K, Leino T, Ranta-Maunus A, Hanhijärvi A (1991) Mechano-sorptive structural analysis of wood by the ABAQUS finite element program. Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo

  128. Ranta-Maunus A (1993) Rheological behaviour of wood in directions perpendicular to the grain. Mater Struct 26:362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Ranta-Maunus A (1975) The viscoelasticity of wood at varying moisture content. Wood Sci Technol 9:189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Fortino S, Mirianon F, Toratti T (2009) A 3D moisture-stress FEM analysis for time dependent problems in timber structures. Mech Time Dependent Mater 13:333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Huč S, Svensson S, Hozjan T (2018) Hygro-mechanical analysis of wood subjected to constant mechanical load and varying relative humidity. Holzforschung. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2018-0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Harrington J, Stol K, Astley R (1998) Modelling the elastic properties of softwood. Holz als Roh Werkstoff 56:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  133. Cariou JL (1987) Caractérisation d’un matériau viscoélastique anisotrope: le bois. PhD thesis, Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

  134. Xavier JC, Garrido NM, Oliveira M, Morais JL, Camanho PP, Pierron F (2004) A comparison between the Iosipescu and off-axis shear test methods for the characterization of Pinus pinaster Ait. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35(7–8):827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Xavier J, Oliveira M, Morais J, Pinto T (2009) Measurement of the shear properties of clear wood by the Arcan test. Holzforschung 63:217–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Santos C, De Jesus A, Morais JJ, Louzada J (2008) Bearing properties of Portuguese pine wood beneath a laterally loaded dowel. Ciência Tecnol Mater 20(1):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  137. Gaspar MJ, Alves A, Louzada J, Morais J, Santos A, Fernandes C, Almeida MH, Rodrigues J (2011) Genetic variation of chemical and mechanical traits of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Correlations with wood density components. Ann For Sci 68:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Santos J (2007) Estudo de modelos e caracterização do comportamento mecânico da Madeira. PhD thesis, Universidade Do Minho, Braga, Portugal

  139. Pereira J, Xavier J, Morais J, Louzada J (2014) Assessing wood quality by spatial variation of elastic properties within the stem: case study of Pinus pinaster in the transverse plane1. Can J For Res 44:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Mencuccini M, Grace J, Fioravanti M (1997) Biomechanical and hydraulic determinants of tree structure in scots pine: anatomical characteristics. Tree Physiol 17(2):105–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Lundström T, Stoeckli V (2008) Fresh-stem bending of silver fir and Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 28:355–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Dahl KB (2009) Mechanical properties of clear wood from Norway spruce. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

  143. Pommier R, Denys B (2014) Garbay G (2014) Modelling the distribution of the variability of maritime pine for wooden sawn timber and finger jointing. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 10(1080/19648189):908652

    Google Scholar 

  144. Gerhards CC (1982) Effect of moisture content and temperature on the mechanical properties of wood: An analysis of immediate effects. Wood Fiber Sci 4–36

  145. Thunell B (1941) Über die elastizität schwedischen kiefernholzes. Holz als Roh Werkstoff 4:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Machado J, Cruz H (2005) Within stem variation of maritime pine timber mechanical properties. Holz als Roh Werkstoff 63:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Forest Products Laboratory (2010) Wood handbook, Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, U.S. Departement of Agriculture, Forest Service, Madison

  148. Grazide C, Coureau JL, Cointe A, Morel S (2018) Mechanical performance curves for the strength grading of maritime pine. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 76:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Morgado T, Dias A, Machado J, Negrao JHJO, Marques A (2017) Grading of portuguese maritime pine small-diameter roundwood. J Mater Civ Eng 29(2):04016209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Morgado T, Rodrigues JN, Machado JS, Dias AMPG (2008) Grading and testing of maritime pine and larch roundwood. Proceedings of COST E53, 29-30 October 2008, Delft, Netherland

  151. En NF, 14251, (2004) Bois de structure rond - Méthodes d’essai. Afnor, France

  152. En NF, 408+A1, (2012) Structures en bois - Bois de structure et bois lamellé-collé - Détermination de certaines propriétés physiques et mécaniques. Afnor, France

  153. En NF, 384+A2, (2022) Bois de structure - Détermination des valeurs caractéristiques des propriétés mécaniques et de la masse volumique. Afnor, France

  154. NP 4305, (1995) Madeira serrada de pinho bravo para estruturas. Classificação Visual, IPQ, Monte da Caparica

  155. Cruz H, Nunes L, Machado J (1998) Update assessment of Portuguese maritime pine timber. For Prod J 48(1):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  156. ISO 13061-6 (2014) Physical and mechanical properties of wood-test methods for small clear wood specimens - Part 6: Determination of ultimate tensile stress parallel to grain. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Genève, Switzerland

  157. UNE 56535, (1977) Características físico-mecáinicas de la madera. Determinación de la resistencia a compression, Asociación Española de Normalización (UNE), Madrid, Spain

  158. UNE-EN 408:2011+A1:2012 (2012) Timber structures - Structural timber and glued laminated timber. Determination of some physical and mechanical properties, Asociación Española de Normalización (UNE), Madrid, Spain

  159. Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  160. Muñoz G, Anta M (2010) Physical properties of thinning wood in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): case study. Eur J Forest Res 129:1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2022) Pinus pinaster Ait.. https://www.gbif.org/species/5285565

  162. CABI (2022) Pinus pinaster. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/41688#toDistributionMaps

  163. Nicholls JWP (1966) Assessment of wood qualities for tree breeding. IV. Pinus pinaster Ait. grown in western Australia. Silvae Genet 16(1):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  164. Ivkovic M, Rozenberg P (2004) A method for describing and modelling of within-ring wood density distribution in clones of three coniferous species. Ann For Sci 61(8):759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Gascogne Bois and ANRT, supporting the first author through Thèse CIFRE Grant 1264, are gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

First author salary is funded by Gascogne Bois company through PhD Thesis CIFRE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Romain Chevalier: investigation, methodology, writing—original draft. Anita Catapano: methodology, validation, writing—review and editing, supervision. Régis Pommier: supervision, funding acquisition. Marco Montemurro: review and editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Catapano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chevalier, R., Catapano, A., Pommier, R. et al. A review on properties and variability of Pinus Pinaster Ait. ssp. Atlantica existing in the Landes of Gascogne. J Wood Sci 70, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02127-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02127-3

Keywords